| reply to JoelC707
Re: General info needed about Statute of Limitations said by JoelC707:And besides, where did I say I wasn't planning on paying it back or anything along those lines?
Why else would you want to know what the statute of limitations is? |
|
JoelC707Premium
join:2002-07-09
West Point, GA
kudos:5 | Maybe because I'm curious? Maybe it got brought up in a conversation with someone and I didn't know the answer so I asked around? Or maybe because the SoL can apply to different types of debts? Which of course have different lengths that "open" accounts. And PLEASE do not take that as meaning I have yet more debt I'm magically trying to get out of. Take your pick but trust me, it's not because you think I want to be a dead beat or whatever. |
|
|
|
| said by JoelC707:Maybe because I'm curious? Maybe it got brought up in a conversation with someone and I didn't know the answer so I asked around? Or maybe because the SoL can apply to different types of debts? Which of course have different lengths that "open" accounts. And PLEASE do not take that as meaning I have yet more debt I'm magically trying to get out of. Take your pick but trust me, it's not because you think I want to be a dead beat or whatever.
There is no other reason the statute of limitations comes into play for. NONE |
|
JoelC707Premium
join:2002-07-09
West Point, GA
kudos:5
1 edit | I agree. But again, what makes you think I'm asking for ME? So universally, someone asks about something (anything, doesn't matter what) and you AUTOMATICALLY assume it's about them and won't take no for an answer? Wow. Just wow.
edit to add a line |
|
 Chuck22Premium
join:2003-11-10
Salt Lake City, UT
kudos:4
 ·Comcast
| reply to tdumaine
said by tdumaine:There is no other reason the statute of limitations comes into play for. NONE
In addition to being beyond the scope of the op's original inquiry, your assumptive remark certainly reflects your lack of comprehensive reasoning. 
--
amicitia sine fraude |
|
| said by Chuck22:said by tdumaine:There is no other reason the statute of limitations comes into play for. NONE
In addition to being beyond the scope of the op's original inquiry, your assumptive remark certainly reflects your lack of comprehensive reasoning. Prove me wrong then? |
|
| reply to JoelC707
said by JoelC707:I agree. But again, what makes you think I'm asking for ME? So universally, someone asks about something (anything, doesn't matter what) and you AUTOMATICALLY assume it's about them and won't take no for an answer? Wow. Just wow.
edit to add a line
For your reference:
said by JoelC707 
WOW! So basically it can vary from situation to situation. In my specific case the accounts were both opened in GA and the bulk of the transactions were likely in GA but I was in AZ for a while before I lost the means to pay them. As I said, in my case, both AZ and GA have the same 6 year length on SoL so short of one state being more "beneficial" or them choosing to do so in their state, it really doesn't matter in my case. I know what I'm asking is rather broad but I'm not looking for assistance in my specific case, I was just curious about the "in general" nature of the question.
[/BQUOTE : |
|
JoelC707Premium
join:2002-07-09
West Point, GA
kudos:5 | said by tdumaine:said by JoelC707:I agree. But again, what makes you think I'm asking for ME? So universally, someone asks about something (anything, doesn't matter what) and you AUTOMATICALLY assume it's about them and won't take no for an answer? Wow. Just wow.
edit to add a line
For your reference: said by JoelC707
WOW! So basically it can vary from situation to situation. In my specific case the accounts were both opened in GA and the bulk of the transactions were likely in GA but I was in AZ for a while before I lost the means to pay them. As I said, in my case, both AZ and GA have the same 6 year length on SoL so short of one state being more "beneficial" or them choosing to do so in their state, it really doesn't matter in my case. I know what I'm asking is rather broad but I'm not looking for assistance in my specific case, I was just curious about the "in general" nature of the question. Fixed it for you, pay special attention to the underlined part....
Oh and before you go and claim "not asking for assistance in my specific case" was me admitting I'm planning on dodging my obligations, think again (but if the rest of this thread is any indication, I know you won't), it's not. |
|
JoelC707Premium
join:2002-07-09
West Point, GA
kudos:5 | reply to tdumaine
said by tdumaine:said by Chuck22:said by tdumaine:There is no other reason the statute of limitations comes into play for. NONE
In addition to being beyond the scope of the op's original inquiry, your assumptive remark certainly reflects your lack of comprehensive reasoning. Prove me wrong then? I've tried. You refuse to accept it and as far as I'm concerned, that is your problem not mine. If you want "proof" that I have some kind of payment plan setup or something like that forget it. I'm not giving up something like that and you can continue to believe (wrongly) whatever you like. |
|
| reply to JoelC707
said by JoelC707:said by tdumaine:said by JoelC707:I agree. But again, what makes you think I'm asking for ME? So universally, someone asks about something (anything, doesn't matter what) and you AUTOMATICALLY assume it's about them and won't take no for an answer? Wow. Just wow.
edit to add a line
For your reference: said by JoelC707
WOW! So basically it can vary from situation to situation. In my specific case the accounts were both opened in GA and the bulk of the transactions were likely in GA but I was in AZ for a while before I lost the means to pay them. As I said, in my case, both AZ and GA have the same 6 year length on SoL so short of one state being more "beneficial" or them choosing to do so in their state, it really doesn't matter in my case. I know what I'm asking is rather broad but I'm not looking for assistance in my specific case, I was just curious about the "in general" nature of the question. Fixed it for you, pay special attention to the underlined part.... Oh and before you go and claim "not asking for assistance in my specific case" was me admitting I'm planning on dodging my obligations, think again (but if the rest of this thread is any indication, I know you won't), it's not. So you say its not about "you", i quote and markup where you say "In my specific case" and "I was in AZ for a while before I lost the means to pay them" so your response is to say you arent asking about your specific case, but you really are? |
|
| reply to JoelC707
said by JoelC707:I've tried. You refuse to accept it and as far as I'm concerned, that is your problem not mine. If you want "proof" that I have some kind of payment plan setup or something like that forget it. I'm not giving up something like that and you can continue to believe (wrongly) whatever you like.
Prove me wrong was to Chuck22 if you look at that reply, it says "reply to ...." kind of like this one says to you? lol |
|
JoelC707Premium
join:2002-07-09
West Point, GA
kudos:5 | reply to tdumaine
Here we go again... The helpful people that originally replied indicated that the question was too broad and that specifics were needed. I SPECIFICALLY did not want to provide specifics because of this right here. THAT is the ENTIRE reason for my specific case to even be in this thread. End of story. |
|
JoelC707Premium
join:2002-07-09
West Point, GA
kudos:5 | reply to tdumaine
Sigh.... just stop. |
|
| reply to JoelC707
said by JoelC707:Here we go again... The helpful people that originally replied indicated that the question was too broad and that specifics were needed. I SPECIFICALLY did not want to provide specifics because of this right here. THAT is the ENTIRE reason for my specific case to even be in this thread. End of story.
Because you knew someone would say what i did if you were more specific about not wanting to pay. |
|
JoelC707Premium
join:2002-07-09
West Point, GA
kudos:5 | Putting words in my mouth much? |
|
| said by JoelC707:Putting words in my mouth much?
Only your own words |
|
JoelC707Premium
join:2002-07-09
West Point, GA
kudos:5 | Wow are you really that dense? Or do you just not read or better yet just not believe what people tell you? |
|
| said by JoelC707:Wow are you really that dense? Or do you just not read or better yet just not believe what people tell you?
How am i not reading? How am i dense? Iquoted your own words out of your own mouth? |
|
JoelC707Premium
join:2002-07-09
West Point, GA
kudos:5 | OK then, show me where I said I wasn't planning on paying back my debt. I want "my own words", not some assumption from you about this being about me or you just assuming that because I'm asking I must be guilty. |
|
| said by JoelC707:OK then, show me where I said I wasn't planning on paying back my debt. I want "my own words", not some assumption from you about this being about me or you just assuming that because I'm asking I must be guilty.
No, you never said you werent planning on paying them back in those words. You asked about the statute, without any details at all. Then when you did give some details, it's about you not being able to pay and asking about the statute of limitations.
The only reason to ask about the statute of limitations and not being able to pay (like i said, voluntarily or involuntarily), what other assumption is there?
You are not offering any other reason why you would be asking about the statute and not being able to pay. You are getting very defensive about it (when you really shouldnt be) unless that is a correct assumption.
If it is an incorrect assumption, feel free to correct me. Correcting me is not just saying "no thats not what it is just because i say so". Correcting me is not just saying other things.
Correcting me is giving the info, or at the very least saying its a personal reason you do not wish to disclose that, but then that just makes the assumption have even more appearance of being correct.
Any other questions? |
|
