US Cable Support > Time Warner Internet Services > let the speculation begin!

reply to motorola870

Re: let the speculation begin!

reply to motorola870
This one may be faster as the Docsis 3 upgrade involved changing a lot of equipment and programming in their headends, this should be changing some setting numbers and making sure their infrastructure can handle it (Which they claim it can).

reply to motorola870
Any update on the RGV?

reply to Fleeced

reply to motorola870
Appears to be live - my 50/5 is now testing at 113/5.6. Peakview seems to struggle at that speed, and I had better results using the high bandwidth test ran by Verizon.

Actual performance seems to match, around 115-118mbit.

One speed test from speedtest.net using a Chicago source (the KC area hosts are all crap):

reply to motorola870
Here in San Antonio the 4 channels are allocated but not lit up yet. I have a channel scanner that I used for my HD homerun Prime and it picked this up 597,591,585,579 for the 4 live channels looks like 573,567,561,555 are going to be the new ones.

Sorry no upstream channels as the lowest it scans is 57mhz and the upstream channels are in the 20 to 30 mhz range

SCANNING: 603000000 (us-irc:87, us-cable:87)
LOCK: qam256 (ss=100 snq=100 seq=100)
TSID: 0x16F9
PROGRAM 1129: 0 (encrypted)
PROGRAM 1145: 0 (encrypted)
PROGRAM 1174: 0 (encrypted)
PROGRAM 62351: 0 (control)
SCANNING: 597000000 (us-irc:86, us-cable:86)
LOCK: qam256 (ss=100 snq=100 seq=100)
SCANNING: 591000000 (us-irc:85, us-cable:85)
LOCK: qam256 (ss=100 snq=100 seq=100)
SCANNING: 585000000 (us-irc:84, us-cable:84)
LOCK: qam256 (ss=100 snq=100 seq=100)
SCANNING: 579000000 (us-irc:83, us-cable:83)
LOCK: qam256 (ss=100 snq=100 seq=100)
SCANNING: 573000000 (us-irc:82, us-cable:82)
LOCK: qam256 (ss=100 snq=100 seq=100)
TSID: 0x09CF
SCANNING: 567000000 (us-irc:81, us-cable:81)
LOCK: qam256 (ss=100 snq=100 seq=100)
TSID: 0x09CD
SCANNING: 561000000 (us-irc:80, us-cable:80)
LOCK: qam256 (ss=100 snq=100 seq=100)
TSID: 0x09CB
SCANNING: 555000000 (us-irc:79, us-cable:79)
LOCK: qam256 (ss=100 snq=100 seq=100)
TSID: 0x09C9
SCANNING: 549000000 (us-irc:78, us-cable:78)
LOCK: qam256 (ss=100 snq=100 seq=100)
TSID: 0x0EB4
PROGRAM 180: 0 (encrypted)
PROGRAM 181: 0 (encrypted)
PROGRAM 310: 0 (encrypted)
PROGRAM 350: 0 (encrypted)
PROGRAM 1900: 0 (encrypted)
PROGRAM 4000: 0 (encrypted)

reply to motorola870
100/25 sounds great, any rumors/insight on Manhattan? My hub is still at 6/4 bonding.

reply to TWCdude

said by TWCdude:

Here in San Antonio the 4 channels are allocated but not lit up yet. I have a channel scanner that I used for my HD homerun Prime and it picked this up 597,591,585,579 for the 4 live channels looks like 573,567,561,555 are going to be the new ones.

Sorry no upstream channels as the lowest it scans is 57mhz and the upstream channels are in the 20 to 30 mhz range

SCANNING: 603000000 (us-irc:87, us-cable:87)
LOCK: qam256 (ss=100 snq=100 seq=100)
TSID: 0x16F9
PROGRAM 1129: 0 (encrypted)
PROGRAM 1145: 0 (encrypted)
PROGRAM 1174: 0 (encrypted)
PROGRAM 62351: 0 (control)
SCANNING: 597000000 (us-irc:86, us-cable:86)
LOCK: qam256 (ss=100 snq=100 seq=100)
SCANNING: 591000000 (us-irc:85, us-cable:85)
LOCK: qam256 (ss=100 snq=100 seq=100)
SCANNING: 585000000 (us-irc:84, us-cable:84)
LOCK: qam256 (ss=100 snq=100 seq=100)
SCANNING: 579000000 (us-irc:83, us-cable:83)
LOCK: qam256 (ss=100 snq=100 seq=100)
SCANNING: 573000000 (us-irc:82, us-cable:82)
LOCK: qam256 (ss=100 snq=100 seq=100)
TSID: 0x09CF
SCANNING: 567000000 (us-irc:81, us-cable:81)
LOCK: qam256 (ss=100 snq=100 seq=100)
TSID: 0x09CD
SCANNING: 561000000 (us-irc:80, us-cable:80)
LOCK: qam256 (ss=100 snq=100 seq=100)
TSID: 0x09CB
SCANNING: 555000000 (us-irc:79, us-cable:79)
LOCK: qam256 (ss=100 snq=100 seq=100)
TSID: 0x09C9
SCANNING: 549000000 (us-irc:78, us-cable:78)
LOCK: qam256 (ss=100 snq=100 seq=100)
TSID: 0x0EB4
PROGRAM 180: 0 (encrypted)
PROGRAM 181: 0 (encrypted)
PROGRAM 310: 0 (encrypted)
PROGRAM 350: 0 (encrypted)
PROGRAM 1900: 0 (encrypted)
PROGRAM 4000: 0 (encrypted)

TWCdude

549MHz
555MHz
561MHz
567MHz

in San Antonio are used for VOD sorry but they are going to have to reorganize to get 8 channels in.

Plans are to move everything off of 71 to 76 on the analogs in San Antonio to make room.

Bravo from Standard Cable Channel 76 to Standard Cable Channel 23
CNBC from Standard Cable Channel 37 to Standard Cable Channel 73 (Digital Set-Top Box or Digital Adaptor Required)
C-SPAN from Standard Cable Channel 23 to Standard Cable Channel 76 (Digital Set-Top Box or Digital Adaptor Required)
FX from Standard Cable Channel 73 to Standard Cable Channel 37
History from Standard Cable Channel 74 to Standard Cable Channel 66
LMN from Standard Cable Channel 66 to Standard Cable Channel 74 (Digital Set-Top Box or Digital Adaptor Required)
OWN from Standard Cable Channel 44 to Standard Cable Channel 71 (Digital Set-Top Box or Digital Adaptor Required)
Syfy from Standard Cable Channel 72 to Standard Cable Channel 65
TCM from Standard Cable Channel 71 to Standard Cable Channel 44

these below are off of silicondust lineup for 78201 zip code in San Antonio so yes those four channels you mentoned are for VOD.
qam256 79-17779 UNKNOWN
qam256 79-17846 UNKNOWN
qam256 79-17861 UNKNOWN
qam256 79-17862 UNKNOWN
qam256 79-17881 UNKNOWN
qam256 79-17883 UNKNOWN
qam256 79-17887 UNKNOWN
qam256 79-17894 UNKNOWN
qam256 79-17905 UNKNOWN
qam256 79-17909 UNKNOWN
qam256 79-17911 UNKNOWN
qam256 79-17913 UNKNOWN
qam256 79-17920 UNKNOWN
qam256 80-17794 UNKNOWN
qam256 80-17797 UNKNOWN
qam256 80-17882 UNKNOWN
qam256 80-17907 UNKNOWN
qam256 80-17915 UNKNOWN

reply to motorola870
Still 4 channels down and 1 up here. Then again, it took SD a very long time to get channel bonding/Ultimate in the first place, so I expect TWC to go to 8/4 long after the other major markets.

reply to motorola870
Yea, I'm seeing the increase too in KC. Upload is slow today, which sucks cause I'm working from home cause of the snow lol

reply to motorola870
No love for LA Still rocking the 4 down / 1 up channel bonding and 30/5 speeds on Extreme.

/M

reply to PrymeMover
The change took effect Tuesday for me

reply to Smith6612

reply to thorin
I think mine did too, but I was using the KC based test servers, none of which go above 30 it seems.

reply to motorola870
No changes yet here. Guess I'll try restarting my modem. I'm more excited for any upload increases than down... 5up is just paltry

reply to motorola870
TWC has been pretty terrible with all uploads. Maybe one day they'll catch up with everyone else.

reply to bluepoint

said by bluepoint:

said by Smith6612:

Nice. Let's see how long it will be until the upload is less anemic in comparison to the download

I have to agree that's a lame upload speed when they're trying to compete with 1 Gps .