said by TwiztedZero:TSI is allready covered for this eventuality in the Terms of Service and the User Agreement Policy. And they won't violate that without a court order.
Once a court order is successfully obtained then its out of TSI's hands. Obligations are covered from a legal standpoint.
Obligations are covered when a court rules that obligations are covered, and not one second before.
I did not say that the eventuality is that TSI is held liable for releasing the information, only that they are made a party to an action for keeping the logs to begin with and then releasing the information based on a court order obtained with erroneous, borderline fraudulent evidence.
This is a big pile of shit waiting to hit the fan. I can't imagine how TSI is going to walk away from this without a few turds being launched in their direction - some of which may reach the target and stick.
For example, how long before word gets out - probably already has - that TSI aided Voltage with personal information on its clients. You think people are going to give a shit how or why TSI released that info? Nope. I'm betting many hundreds are already looking for new providers, and hundreds more looking for elegant ways out of this mess.
I'm just saying... if this were me, and my company, I'd quietly hit the delete key on those fucking logs in 3 seconds flat, respond with "sorry don't have anything" and see everyone in court.
But that's just me.
Mike