NetDog Premium Member join:2002-03-04 Hollywood, FL |
to dabomb4097
Re: [IPv6] Comcast IPv6 Gives Address But No Default Gatewaysaid by dabomb4097:So, here's the next fun question...if it is a cable modem firmware problem, how can I correct that? Comcast will push the firmware to you on approved cable modems, and yes the SB6120\SB6121 is approved. said by dabomb4097:Or is the firmware problem just an incompatibility with my particular router, and getting a different router will fix it? I am going to try and recreate the issue on Monday so standby, if I can recreate the issue then we can go from there. |
|
|
Thanks! My router is an Cisco/Linksys E3200 Hardware 1.0 with firmware 1.0.04 build 1 Apr 10, 2012. And I'm not sure if its a coincidence or not, but I woke up this morning and found both my TV and HSI completely out. There appears to be no signal, TV or Internet, on the line coming into my house at all. |
|
|
Maybe something outside (or somewhere on Comcast's end) was failing and causing the IPv6 to not pass through, and when it completely failed it resulted in complete loss of service. Are your neighbors affected too? |
|
NetDog Premium Member join:2002-03-04 Hollywood, FL |
NetDog
Premium Member
2012-Dec-16 9:08 pm
said by Mike Wolf:Maybe something outside (or somewhere on Comcast's end) was failing and causing the IPv6 to not pass through, and when it completely failed it resulted in complete loss of service. Are your neighbors affected too? Mike, I have checked with other customers that this users CMTS and they are working fine. So it is only this user and one other user on a totally different CMTS. From what I can see so far they are not receiving the RA's from the CMTS. Very odd.. |
|
|
Are both customers using the same or similar family router like from the 2011 E series or 2012 EA series routers?
However, I really don't think it's the router because with how popular these two series are, there would be more customers affected and I haven't heard seen anything similar to this yet. Could it be possible that the modem wasn't provisioned correctly on the account? |
|
NetDog Premium Member join:2002-03-04 Hollywood, FL |
NetDog
Premium Member
2012-Dec-17 12:02 pm
said by Mike Wolf:Are both customers using the same or similar family router like from the 2011 E series or 2012 EA series routers?
However, I really don't think it's the router because with how popular these two series are, there would be more customers affected and I haven't heard seen anything similar to this yet. Could it be possible that the modem wasn't provisioned correctly on the account? The issue must be modem related, bootfile or something.. One user has a SB6120 the other SB6121. One user has a ASUS RT-N66U (I know for a fact this works) and the other has a Cisco E3200. One tested directly with a Windows 7 PC without seeing the RA's. Not the same CMTS, not even close.. Both are not seeing the RA's coming from the CMTS, but other customers on the same CMTS's are working. |
|
|
This is definitely troubling. |
|
NetFixerFrom My Cold Dead Hands Premium Member join:2004-06-24 The Boro Netgear CM500 Pace 5268AC TRENDnet TEW-829DRU
|
NetFixer
Premium Member
2012-Dec-18 12:36 am
said by Mike Wolf:This is definitely troubling. And even more so for those who are actually experiencing this anomaly. |
|
whfsdude Premium Member join:2003-04-05 Washington, DC
4 recommendations |
to Mike Wolf
said by Mike Wolf:This is definitely troubling. I don't mean to hijack the thread but this has to be said. I'd say this is all really awesome and positive for the Internet community. You have an ISP aggressively deploying IPv6 and pushing the CPE vendors. Active community engagement and open dialog with power users to hammer out the bugs. If every ISP acted like this, we wouldn't be sitting at 2% adoption in North America. |
|
NetFixerFrom My Cold Dead Hands Premium Member join:2004-06-24 The Boro Netgear CM500 Pace 5268AC TRENDnet TEW-829DRU
1 edit
3 recommendations |
NetFixer
Premium Member
2012-Dec-18 1:22 am
said by whfsdude:said by Mike Wolf:This is definitely troubling. I don't mean to hijack the thread but this has to be said. I'd say this is all really awesome and positive for the Internet community. You have an ISP aggressively deploying IPv6 and pushing the CPE vendors. Active community engagement and open dialog with power users to hammer out the bugs. If every ISP acted like this, we wouldn't be sitting at 2% adoption in North America. Can anyone imagine AT&T working one on one with individual residential or small business customers to get IPv6 working? Can anyone image AT&T even getting native IPv6 working for anyone other than a few select enterprise level customers? There is a reason why I use 10 year old routers that have a snowball's chance in hell of ever being upgraded to support IPv6 to connect to my backup AT&T connection. Although, the Mayan Calendar that the TRENDnet router uses may force me to replace it after the upcoming Winter Solstice.
|
|
1 recommendation |
to whfsdude
Very true. |
|