dslreports logo
 
    All Forums Hot Topics Gallery
spc
Search similar:


uniqs
9423
Riplin
join:2002-05-13
canada

Riplin to resa1983

Member

to resa1983

Re: [Twitter] Court Hashtag - for Monday ?

Why am I not surprised.
UK_Dave
join:2011-01-27
Powassan, ON

UK_Dave

Member

Teksavvy seeking adjournment.......
UK_Dave

UK_Dave

Member

Saying that only 10% of the affected have received notice.

So, the links in that email?
UK_Dave

UK_Dave

Member

teksavvy uncovered errors in its approach to sending notices due to short time frame. 42 people so far have gotten notices who shouldn't
UK_Dave

UK_Dave

Member

Justice has only just received cippic letter.....

xsbell
join:2008-12-22
Canada

xsbell to TwiztedZero

Member

to TwiztedZero
edit: sorry Dave, I'll let you handle it.
UK_Dave
join:2011-01-27
Powassan, ON

UK_Dave

Member

Voltage arguing cippic has no standing. Procedural issues.
UK_Dave

UK_Dave

Member

Voltage says they contacted teksavvy on November 1st
UK_Dave

UK_Dave

Member

These reposts coming from Paul Anderson. Dont know who you are, but thanks.

EDIT. Thanks Ak

AkFubar
Admittedly, A Teksavvy Fan
join:2005-02-28
Toronto CAN.

AkFubar to TwiztedZero

Member

to TwiztedZero
Anderson is CIPPIC
UK_Dave
join:2011-01-27
Powassan, ON

UK_Dave

Member

they did embed a "malicious link" in their email @mgeist: @pandersen: #teksavvy has only gotten confirmation that 10% have received notice
UK_Dave

UK_Dave

Member

#teksavvy rebuts evidence issue notes that some issues only came to light this morning. No time to swear an affidavit.
UK_Dave

UK_Dave

Member

Voltage notes that no affidavit has been filed on evidence
UK_Dave

UK_Dave

Member

#teksavvy disputes November 1st date noting that only drafts were provided. Actual motion came early December.

BACONATOR26
Premium Member
join:2000-11-25
Nepean, ON

BACONATOR26 to TwiztedZero

Premium Member

to TwiztedZero
"Voltage is concerned that a delay allows those titles remain available online and that is what their client wishes to stop."

As if stopping only TekSavvy customers will stop p2p availability.. Sorry for the interruption, just had to vent.
UK_Dave
join:2011-01-27
Powassan, ON

UK_Dave

Member

Voltage notes this motion is precursor to litigation against individuals who have infringed.
UK_Dave

UK_Dave

Member

#teksavvy arguing against voltage of prejudice delay noting their documents only talk about infringement at a specific point not ongoing.
UK_Dave

UK_Dave

Member

Voltage counters they can't launch injunction unless they know who the individuals are. #teksavvy
UK_Dave

UK_Dave

Member

Voltage suggests that if court wishes the motion could continue on those who have gotten notice. Deal with errors later
UK_Dave

UK_Dave

Member

IMPORTANT:

Judge has adjourned for five minutes or however long it takes to get his thoughts as he considers the cippic letter he just got
ep80
join:2008-08-11
Montreal, QC

ep80 to TwiztedZero

Member

to TwiztedZero
"Voltage is concerned that a delay allows those titles remain available online and that is what their client wishes to stop."

I really have high doubts that the users are still sharing the alleged files! This is nonsense.
UK_Dave
join:2011-01-27
Powassan, ON

UK_Dave

Member

#teksavvy asking for delay to jan due to large number of affected customers not receiving notice (Thanks, Teresa)
UK_Dave

UK_Dave

Member

It appears (there are) no further submissions and there is a feeling a decision will come very shortly

Here we go folks.... hang on.
UK_Dave

UK_Dave

Member

CIPPIC was not given chance to speak but their letter is being read by judge
UK_Dave

UK_Dave

Member

Appears we are about to go back into session
resa1983
Premium Member
join:2008-03-10
North York, ON

resa1983 to UK_Dave

Premium Member

to UK_Dave
42 subscribers reported in error. 92 not reported in error to be sent soon. Those infusion emails? They've been using them to track how many people have received their notices. Which is less than 10% of affected subs.

Judge refused to hear cippic, as they didn't move to intervene, but just write a letter. Judge will read letter again before decision to delay to jan.

Judge making decision now, hense able to tweet.

DocS
@gc.ca

DocS to ep80

Anon

to ep80
It goes to show how they want the court to remain ignorant about the nature of Bittorrenting.
resa1983
Premium Member
join:2008-03-10
North York, ON

resa1983

Premium Member

Oh yeah.. Main thing.. Teksavvy opposing motion til they can inform more subscribers.
JMJimmy
join:2008-07-23

JMJimmy to resa1983

Member

to resa1983
said by resa1983:

42 subscribers reported in error. 92 not reported in error to be sent soon. Those infusion emails? They've been using them to track how many people have received their notices. Which is less than 10% of affected subs.

Judge refused to hear cippic, as they didn't move to intervene, but just write a letter. Judge will read letter again before decision to delay to jan.

Judge making decision now, hense able to tweet.

CIPPIC didn't move to intervene!?! In the letter they state their intention to do just that... !#$@#%&$&

Gimli
Premium Member
join:2006-01-03
l5a2o4

Gimli

Premium Member

said by JMJimmy:

said by resa1983:

42 subscribers reported in error. 92 not reported in error to be sent soon. Those infusion emails? They've been using them to track how many people have received their notices. Which is less than 10% of affected subs.

Judge refused to hear cippic, as they didn't move to intervene, but just write a letter. Judge will read letter again before decision to delay to jan.

Judge making decision now, hense able to tweet.

CIPPIC didn't move to intervene!?! In the letter they state their intention to do just that... !#$@#%&$&

So Teksavvy is sitting there making sure they dont get in crap for not complying and CIPPIC is like baby in the corner....

lovely