ep80
join:2008-08-11
Montreal, QC | reply to TwiztedZero
Re: [Twitter] Court Hashtag - for Monday ? "Voltage is concerned that a delay allows those titles remain available online and that is what their client wishes to stop."
I really have high doubts that the users are still sharing the alleged files! This is nonsense. |
|
UK_Dave
join:2011-01-27
Powassan, ON
kudos:2 | #teksavvy asking for delay to jan due to large number of affected customers not receiving notice (Thanks, Teresa) |
|
|
|
UK_Dave
join:2011-01-27
Powassan, ON
kudos:2 | It appears (there are) no further submissions and there is a feeling a decision will come very shortly
Here we go folks.... hang on. |
|
UK_Dave
join:2011-01-27
Powassan, ON
kudos:2 | CIPPIC was not given chance to speak but their letter is being read by judge |
|
UK_Dave
join:2011-01-27
Powassan, ON
kudos:2 | Appears we are about to go back into session |
|
resa1983Premium
join:2008-03-10
North York, ON
kudos:7 Reviews:
 ·TekSavvy Cable
| reply to UK_Dave
42 subscribers reported in error. 92 not reported in error to be sent soon. Those infusion emails? They've been using them to track how many people have received their notices. Which is less than 10% of affected subs.
Judge refused to hear cippic, as they didn't move to intervene, but just write a letter. Judge will read letter again before decision to delay to jan.
Judge making decision now, hense able to tweet.
--
Battle.net Tech Support MVP |
|
| reply to ep80
It goes to show how they want the court to remain ignorant about the nature of Bittorrenting. |
|
resa1983Premium
join:2008-03-10
North York, ON
kudos:7 | reply to resa1983
Oh yeah.. Main thing.. Teksavvy opposing motion til they can inform more subscribers.
--
Battle.net Tech Support MVP |
|
| reply to resa1983
said by resa1983:42 subscribers reported in error. 92 not reported in error to be sent soon. Those infusion emails? They've been using them to track how many people have received their notices. Which is less than 10% of affected subs.
Judge refused to hear cippic, as they didn't move to intervene, but just write a letter. Judge will read letter again before decision to delay to jan.
Judge making decision now, hense able to tweet.
CIPPIC didn't move to intervene!?! In the letter they state their intention to do just that... !#$@#%&$& |
|
 GimliPremium
join:2006-01-03
l5a2o4 | said by JMJimmy:said by resa1983:42 subscribers reported in error. 92 not reported in error to be sent soon. Those infusion emails? They've been using them to track how many people have received their notices. Which is less than 10% of affected subs.
Judge refused to hear cippic, as they didn't move to intervene, but just write a letter. Judge will read letter again before decision to delay to jan.
Judge making decision now, hense able to tweet.
CIPPIC didn't move to intervene!?! In the letter they state their intention to do just that... !#$@#%&$& So Teksavvy is sitting there making sure they dont get in crap for not complying and CIPPIC is like baby in the corner....
lovely |
|
 xsbell
join:2008-12-22
Canada
kudos:1 | reply to TwiztedZero
Judge adjourns to January 14th. |
|
UK_Dave
join:2011-01-27
Powassan, ON
kudos:2 | Adjourned till Jan 14th....
No other findings on matters of substance. |
|
tezster
join:2007-10-17
Mississauga, ON | reply to Gimli
People sure like to jump to the worse possible conclusions here - CIPPIC weren't given a chance to speak; what are they supposed to do? |
|
| reply to xsbell
said by xsbell:Judge adjourns to January 7th.
Next sitting is the 14th. |
|
UK_Dave
join:2011-01-27
Powassan, ON
kudos:2 | reply to UK_Dave
Big thanks to Paul Andersen, and Teresa for sterling work getting tweets out in the circumstances.... |
|
xsbell
join:2008-12-22
Canada
kudos:1 | reply to JMJimmy
Thanks! |
|
Reviews:
·TekSavvy Cable
| reply to JMJimmy
said by JMJimmy:said by resa1983:42 subscribers reported in error. 92 not reported in error to be sent soon. Those infusion emails? They've been using them to track how many people have received their notices. Which is less than 10% of affected subs.
Judge refused to hear cippic, as they didn't move to intervene, but just write a letter. Judge will read letter again before decision to delay to jan.
Judge making decision now, hense able to tweet.
CIPPIC didn't move to intervene!?! In the letter they state their intention to do just that... !#$@#%&$& They didn't move to intervene because they didn't have enough time to do so (as mentioned in the letter) so with it pushed back to jan 14th that should allow them time to do so... at least that's how I read/see it |
|
 TwiztedZeroNine Zero Burp Nine SixPremium
join:2011-03-31
Toronto, ON
kudos:3
·TekSavvy Cable
| reply to UK_Dave
said by UK_Dave:Big thanks to Paul Andersen, and Teresa for sterling work getting tweets out in the circumstances....
+1  
--
IF TREE = FALL AND PEOPLE = ZERO THEN SOUND = 0
Nine.Zero.Burp.Nine.Six
Twitter = Twizted
Chat = irc.teksavvy.ca |
|
| reply to tezster
said by tezster:People sure like to jump to the worse possible conclusions here - CIPPIC weren't given a chance to speak; what are they supposed to do?
Unless resa is wrong, they didn't get a chance to speak because they didn't file to intervene. They filed a letter which merely claims their intent to intervene. |
|
