dslreports logo
 
    All Forums Hot Topics Gallery
spc
uniqs
12

hm
@videotron.ca

hm to jkoblovsky

Anon

to jkoblovsky

Re: So, onward we go

said by jkoblovsky:

The CIPPIC will definitely motion to get involved.

Teksavvy can now also oppose it.

I don't expect anyone to know what stratagy they will take till lawyers on both sides fight it out.
jkoblovsky
join:2011-09-27
Keswick, ON

jkoblovsky

Member

said by hm :

said by jkoblovsky:

The CIPPIC will definitely motion to get involved.

Teksavvy can now also oppose it.

From what took place in the court today, there's no hint that is possible. The motion to adjourn was based on notification, not intent to oppose.

hm
@videotron.ca

hm

Anon

said by jkoblovsky:

said by hm :

said by jkoblovsky:

The CIPPIC will definitely motion to get involved.

Teksavvy can now also oppose it.

From what took place in the court today, there's no hint that is possible. The motion to adjourn was based on notification, not intent to oppose.

Not according to copyright (and real) lawyer, Howard Knopf.
It will be interesting to see if Teksavvy now decides to actually oppose and if CIPPIC is permitted to intervene

El Quintron
Cancel Culture Ambassador
Premium Member
join:2008-04-28
Tronna

El Quintron to jkoblovsky

Premium Member

to jkoblovsky
said by jkoblovsky:

From what took place in the court today, there's no hint that is possible. The motion to adjourn was based on notification, not intent to oppose.

I'd argue Teksavvy is going to hold its hand fairly close to its chest on this one, and it's going to be fairly difficult to predict what they've got planned as their next move.