dslreports logo
 
    All Forums Hot Topics Gallery
spc
Search similar:


uniqs
3662

TheTechGuru
join:2004-03-25
TEXAS

TheTechGuru to nunya

Member

to nunya

Re: Future Proofing home networks

said by nunya:

Tell that to 3 Roku's (all streaming HD), 3 laptops, a WII, an Xbox 360, 1 MythTV frontend, and 3 smart phones.
They are all very happy on wireless. I have wired connections available but don't even bother except on stationary PCs.
Excepting OTA (and I also stream OTA on my LAN!), I'm all IPTV. Guess what? It's happening now - and working just fine.

You're obviously not around neighbors hogging spectrum.

If you're the only one in range wireless works great, but a lot of people have neighbors and smart meters competing for the 2.4ghz spectrum.

Once place I lived I was forced to use channel 13 just for my wifi network to work at all.

Also, I transfer huge files between my server, laptop, and desktop all the time and that is done much faster over wired gigabit than even 300mbps wifi.

Ya, STP is probably overkill for a single family home.

Jack_in_VA
Premium Member
join:2007-11-26
North, VA

Jack_in_VA to nunya

Premium Member

to nunya
said by nunya:

Tell that to 3 Roku's (all streaming HD), 3 laptops, a WII, an Xbox 360, 1 MythTV frontend, and 3 smart phones.
They are all very happy on wireless. I have wired connections available but don't even bother except on stationary PCs.
Excepting OTA (and I also stream OTA on my LAN!), I'm all IPTV. Guess what? It's happening now - and working just fine.

STP in a residence? Big old waste of time, effort and money.

There will be a place for wired networks for the foreseeable future, but they are going to eventually disappear in residential settings. I already see the writing on the walls. I practically have to twists peoples wrists any more to get any ethernet jacks or phone jacks installed. All they are concerned about is coax. Which is fine, because even if wireless wouldn't cut the mustard, MoCA will. MoCA is awesome.

I detect some of what we see around here between wired and wireless telco and it's related functions. Wired requires a person and here Verizon is union and Verizon Wireless employees are not. Wireless does not require a human (Verizon Home Connect) so they are cut out. Naturally the human is going to trash wireless to protect their own job. Some of which I see in this thread.

nunya
LXI 483
MVM
join:2000-12-23
O Fallon, MO

nunya to TheTechGuru

MVM

to TheTechGuru
I see anywhere from 10-13 available networks on my laptop right now.
TheSMJ
join:2009-08-19
Farmington, MI

TheSMJ

Member

I can see 20+ wireless networks where I live (an apartment). If I'm more than 30 feet away from the WAP, I'll be lucky if my phone can even stay connected, let alone pass data though.

Wireless is great for devices which are always on the move (laptops, phones, etc), but when streaming lots of data far from the WAP, you're better off with a wired connection whenever possible.

TheTechGuru
join:2004-03-25
TEXAS

TheTechGuru to tschmidt

Member

to tschmidt
Ok, maybe wireless works decently when in the presence of only other wireless networks as they are designed to work around each other.

Many of us have more than others wifi clogging up our 2.4ghz band around us. Like SmartMeter's, Cordless Phones, Fixed Wireless ISP's, room to room Audio/Video transmitters, certain analog wireless security cameras (X10).

Killa200
Premium Member
join:2005-12-02
TN

Killa200

Premium Member

said by TheTechGuru:

Ok, maybe wireless works decently when in the presence of only other wireless networks as they are designed to work around each other.

Many of us have more than others wifi clogging up our 2.4ghz band around us. Like SmartMeter's, Cordless Phones, Fixed Wireless ISP's, room to room Audio/Video transmitters, certain analog wireless security cameras (X10).

Microwaves, certain car reverse cameras, bluetooth, zigbee, list goes on.....

alkizmo
join:2007-06-25
Pierrefonds, QC

alkizmo to tschmidt

Member

to tschmidt
I wonder, why haven't we discussed Ethernet Over Power?
They're a good alternative to WIFI or having to run wires through the walls.

They don't beat wired LAN, but they could certainly beat WIFI especially if the WIFI frequency is overcrowded.

whizkid3
MVM
join:2002-02-21
Queens, NY

1 edit

2 recommendations

whizkid3

MVM

said by alkizmo:

I wonder, why haven't we discussed Ethernet Over Power?

Because ... it sucks?

alkizmo
join:2007-06-25
Pierrefonds, QC

alkizmo

Member

said by whizkid3:

said by alkizmo:

I wonder, why haven't we discussed Ethernet Over Power?

Because it sucks?

Okay.
I never tried it myself since I have no issue with WiFi or running Cat6 in other rooms.
However I did read a lot of good stuff about it on Amazon reviews (hundreds of reviews, with 4+ stars average).
»www.amazon.com/Livewire- ··· er+power
JoelC707
Premium Member
join:2002-07-09
Lanett, AL

JoelC707

Premium Member

IIRC, there was something about it not being able to cross to the other leg, or i it did, the quality was greatly diminished. I may also be remembering an early version and this has since been fixed. I think the main reason why EoP never really took off is that MoCA came around. When you consider that every major room is likely to have some kind of coax drop, it makes sense to use that. Sure it doesn't have the flexibility of using theoretically any outlet in the house but generally all you need to do is get in the room, from there you can run an ethernet drop where you need to go.

leibold
MVM
join:2002-07-09
Sunnyvale, CA
Netgear CG3000DCR
ZyXEL P-663HN-51

1 recommendation

leibold to alkizmo

MVM

to alkizmo
Powerline Ethernet is a quick and easy fix for those locations where you either forgot to bring in your wired LAN or where wifi reception is an issue. I haven't used it as the exclusive LAN but it is certainly possible to use it as such by using more then two powerline ethernet adapters. I'm using a pair of adapters to "temporarily" reach a location until I get around to wire it properly. It has been working so well (several years now) that there hasn't been any incentive to get around to fish that Cat5e cable and it looks pretty permanent for now.

To best understand its limitations forget about thinking that they are turning romex into network cabling. A better way to look at Powerline Ethernet is to think of as a wireless technology that uses power lines for signal propagation. Power lines are an ugly noisy mess and the signal injected by PLE adapters is necessarily weak to prevent all sorts of interference. While the theoretical bandwidth of those adapters is significant, you will rarely see that in real life. You'll see the best performance on outlets on the same breaker and less on outlets of different breakers on the same leg. You may or may not get a signal at all on outlets connected to the other leg in the breaker panel. Surge suppressors (at least the better ones) tend to reduce or completely block the PLE signal. The same applies to some breakers and GFCI.

I'm not sure whether whizkid3 See Profile was referring to the to the technology itself or the quality of the products available on the market but the latter does leave something to be desired (inefficient design produces heat which in turn reduces the life expectancy of the electronics; be sure to allow for sufficient airflow around the PLE adapters).

tschmidt
MVM
join:2000-11-12
Milford, NH
·Consolidated Com..
·Republic Wireless
·Hollis Hosting

tschmidt to alkizmo

MVM

to alkizmo
said by alkizmo:

I wonder, why haven't we discussed Ethernet Over Power?

I started this thread with the intent to discuss various flavors of category rated cabling. However "future Proofing" is a pretty broad topic and Wi-Fi is a major player in both short and long term.

Both phoneline and powerline Ethernet are fair game, but I never understood the attraction. I concur with whizkid3 See Profile they have the complexity of Wi-Fi with none of the advantages.

As to posts about 2.4 GHz congestion that is certainly a problem but I have been amazed how well Wi-Fi radios perform in congested environments even when the preferred SSID is on the same channel and weaker then interference.

At the risk of taking my own thread off topic the 802.11ac spec promises significant wireless performance improvements and operating solely in the 5 GHz band less prone to interference.

For A/V short range interconnect 801.11ad operating at 60 GHz looks very promising along with Zigbee RF4CE remote control standard to replace IR for consumer electronics remote control. Being RF it is not limited to line of sight and should be a boon to home automation. Personally I though this would have occurred a decade ago but squabbling among CE manufactures, that saw a marketing advantage in proprietary implementations, delayed widespread adoption of consumer friendly remote control capability.

/tom


nunya
LXI 483
MVM
join:2000-12-23
O Fallon, MO

nunya to alkizmo

MVM

to alkizmo
Not only does powerline ethernet suck, it sucks ass. So does HPNA.

alkizmo
join:2007-06-25
Pierrefonds, QC

alkizmo

Member

Ok I'll take you and Whizkid's word for it.
I don't need to hope it would work as I have zero WiFi issues and ways to run cat6 to every room without too much trouble.