 jduffyPremium
join:2006-08-20
Cincinnati, OH
 ·Vonage
·net2phone
 ·Cincinnati Bell
·Skype
·Callcentric
 ·RoadRunner Cable
·ooma
| Thanks, I have looked at OnSIP and they are a bit pricey for me. It's just a home office, but I need a viable company, good audio quality, financially viable and some redundancy.
I currently have CallCentric, VOIP.ms, and Anveo with PAYG (well CC I have the 500 minute a month plan) and I know they all sound good. But have no way of assessing their viability and redundancy.
VOIP.ms appears to be a good possibility, I think their servers are redundant, but viability is a concern and I need some sort of package to expense.
Duffy
--
Atheists swear there is no Heaven, but pray there isn't a Hell. |
 mgraves1Premium
join:2004-04-05
Houston, TX
·Junction Networks
| said by jduffy:Thanks, I have looked at OnSIP and they are a bit pricey for me. It's just a home office, but I need a viable company, good audio quality, financially viable and some redundancy. It may not be obvious but you can sign up for their a la carte plan and just pay for what you use. The usage based billing is great. Your 500 min/mo would cost you $15 + 2 for one DID.
I accept that their cost/minute is wholly retail. The lack of a cost per device is a huge advantage in my world.
Based upon last weeks VUC call Phone.com looks promising, too.
--
Michael Graves
Houston TX
»www.mgraves.org |
