republican-creole
site Search:


 
    All Forums Hot Topics Gallery






how-to block ads


 
Search Topic:
Share Topic
Post a:
Post a:
AuthorAll Replies


dillyhammer
A. Good. Start.
Premium,MVM
join:2010-01-09
Hamilton, ON
kudos:9
Reviews:
·Start Communicat..
·Cogeco Cable
·TekSavvy DSL
·Caneris

reply to rocca

Re: IP logging retention

My understanding was that sections 41.25, 41.26 and 41.27 were not part of the proclamation Order and won't be until a public consultation takes place.

At the moment, there are no logging nor reporting requirements.

Has something changed?

Mike
--
Cogeco - The New UBB Devil -»[Burloak] Usage Based Billing Nightmare
Cogeco UBB, No Modem Required - »[Niagara] 40gb of "usage" while the modem is unplugged

Who

join:2012-12-18

said by dillyhammer:

My understanding was that sections 41.25, 41.26 and 41.27 were not part of the proclamation Order and won't be until a public consultation takes place.

At the moment, there are no logging nor reporting requirements.

Has something changed?

Mike

No it hasn't. And it looks like the answer is an evasion.

Thursday, 23-May 23:08:07 Terms of Use & Privacy | feedback | contact | Hosting by nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo
over 13.5 years online © 1999-2013 dslreports.com.
Most commented news this week
Hot Topics