said by Chasely:
I am moving to a new house in orange county and I will get TV and internet service.
TWC offers 50/5mbps and Uverse offers only 24/3. I am a gamer myself and reliable/ low latency service is my top priority.
For gaming, speed isn't as critical as latency. In most cases, AT&T U-verse is delivered over copper from the node; for IPTV, using VDSL. AT&T uses an interleaved data path for VDSL, and will not put VDSL on a "Fast" data path (due to the requirements of IPTV data integrity). For this reason, AT&T will have higher latency than TWC.
I also have doubts about the ability to run TV over copper pair. Personally, I'd go with cable or satellite for TV service, in preference to VDSL/IPTV. For both gaming latency and TV picture quality, I would choose TWC over AT&T U-verse.--
~Oh Lord, why have you come
~To Konnyu, with the Lion and the Drum