 me1212 join:2008-11-20 Pleasant Hill, MO | reply to Krisnatharok
Re: Do high end custom PC's have a future? People who bought nvidia last time, and got a new amd gpu and didn't get rid of the old nvidia.
Sure not many, but hey all I listed were stuff that one could put in a build thats >$1000. |
|
 Da Man join:2008-05-08 Hanover, PA | reply to pandora That $500 Geforce uses the same chip as the $1000 Quadro or $5000 Tesla (same with AMD's Firepro). The chips not good enough for the pro cards get used in the gamer cards. |
|
 Reviews:
·Verizon Online DSL
| reply to kvn864 said by kvn864:said by Krisnatharok:Who does dedicated PhysX cards anymore? I was wondering myself when this came out. How many games and other technologies are still actually support it? kinda thought it wasn't going far from the beginning. List of games that use PhysX »developer.nvidia.com/physx-games
Dont for get game engine like Havok use their own Physic, and is not by Nvidia PhysX marketing. »www.havok.com/ Do you remember which MMO that came out not to long ago that use Havok? Guild Wars 2. Yea, if you were wondering why people say that game is CPU hungry. Because it was using Havok Engine. Oh oh oh, Guess who own Havokkkkkkkkkkk. kekekeke. INTEL. LMAO. YOLO. »en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Havok_(company) . Unreal Engine use PhysX. But most games now dosen't require you to have a Nvidia card just to play their game. Which is stupid to lose half of your buyer. Either Physic is run by GPU(PhysX Nvidia.) or it is run by your CPU, and or None at all(no physic support in the game.)
»en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_game_engines
I got sucker in to Nvidia TXAA. It is only support by like.. couple of games.. One was The Secret World.. But then they took it out when I left the game. I think a month or 2 later, they added back in. |
|
|
|
 El QuintronResident Mouth BreatherPremium join:2008-04-28 Etobicoke, ON kudos:2 Reviews:
·TekSavvy DSL
·WIND Mobile
·voip.ms
| reply to Ghastlyone said by Ghastlyone:My god...10 billion dollar industry. Yeah it's definitely dwindling down to nothing, lol. 10 Billion in 2009, the article says it's at 12.5 Billion now. (so that's 25% growth in 3 years give or take?)
I can't imagine any business analyst worth his or her salary would dismiss this industry. -- Support Bacteria -- It's the Only Culture Some People Have |
|
 kingdome74Emotionally UnavailablePremium join:2002-03-27 Syracuse, NY kudos:2 Reviews:
·Verizon FiOS
·RoadRunner Cable
| reply to pandora I think the one part of the gaming market that's underutilized, at least in terms of graphics and ability to deliver solid video product, is the consoles. How console players put up with those graphics is beyond me. That's the single biggest reason why I love gaming on desktops - graphics. Of course custom building and tricking out our PC's has it's own appeal.
Nothing better than the smell of newly built computer. -- Who said: "In a nation that was proud of hard work, strong families, close-knit communities, and our faith in God, too many of us now tend to worship self-indulgence and consumption." |
|
 BlitzenZeusBurnt Out CynicPremium join:2000-01-13 kudos:2 Reviews:
·Frontier FiOS
| You don't play a game for the graphics, you play it as it's fun. People who rate a game on it's graphics first usually make bad choices, and we all have some old favorites we would play again today if it wasn't for legacy support issues, just for fun even if the graphics didn't even compare to the 8xAA some people expect today.
I like the control of the keyboard, and mouse. I've done games on the pc for years, and on the console. Sometimes those gamepads are not optimal. -- I distrust those people who know so well what god wants them to do because I notice it always coincides with their own desires- Susan B. Anthony Yesterday we obeyed kings, and bent out necks before emperors. But today we kneel only to the truth- Kahlil G. |
|
 pandoraPremium join:2001-06-01 Outland kudos:1 Reviews:
·Google Voice
·Comcast
·ooma
·Future Nine Corp..
| reply to kingdome74 said by kingdome74:How console players put up with those graphics is beyond me. I used to think this way ... however the longevity of a video console permits a lot of learning and optimization when rendering a game that may be absent in a PC product.
More than that, I've become convinced that the HDMI standard we currently use is limited to 60 FPS from the video card to the display. The display may create additional frames via various techniques, but the transmission from the video card to a display device seems limited to 60 FPS.
I can understand how higher settings will make a game look better, but overall, I no longer believe greater than 60 FPS is very important to me. -- "If you put the federal government in charge of the Sahara Desert, in 5 years there'd be a shortage of sand." - Milton Friedman" |
|
 Reviews:
·Millenicom
·AT&T Southeast
·Verizon Wireless..
| reply to pandora The more power for CPU and video, the shorter the battery life. If we could move away from the thin fixation in laptops and tablets, we could get some decent real world battery life. For workstation and heavy multitasking desktop users, the more the merrier. A group of CAD/CAM programmers I know just got new HP Z820s with liquid cooling, RAID 0 15,000 rpm hard drives, and dual NVIDIA 6000 graphics cards. Their old computers were 6 to 8 years old and took 60 minutes to do CAM analysis. Now it takes 20 minutes. They say that is still too much time. They want CAM analysis in under 10 minutes and double the monitors (going from 2 to 4 or 4 to 8). Yes there will be a place for high end desktop and workstation components in the future. |
|
 BlitzenZeusBurnt Out CynicPremium join:2000-01-13 kudos:2 Reviews:
·Frontier FiOS
| reply to pandora It's not just about 60 fps, over 40+ is good, and most monitors can't even display more than 60, it's not the video cards creating the limitation. That is also why some people buy 120Hz monitors on purpose, or use a hdtv capable of displaying 120-240Hz.
If you buy a good video card it will last quite a while, instead of it choking on low settings when a new games comes out in a couple years, that also depends on the age of the system due to pci express hardware limitation, along with processor limitations if it has to handle physx. Buy a good card now, and it will last quite a while. Buy a budget card from the start, and it will cost more if you have to replace it too soon. -- I distrust those people who know so well what god wants them to do because I notice it always coincides with their own desires- Susan B. Anthony Yesterday we obeyed kings, and bent out necks before emperors. But today we kneel only to the truth- Kahlil G. |
|
 GhastlyonePremium join:2009-01-07 Las Vegas, NV kudos:2 | reply to BlitzenZeus said by BlitzenZeus:You don't play a game for the graphics, you play it as it's fun. People who rate a game on it's graphics first usually make bad choices, and we all have some old favorites we would play again today if it wasn't for legacy support issues, just for fun even if the graphics didn't even compare to the 8xAA some people expect today.
I like the control of the keyboard, and mouse. I've done games on the pc for years, and on the console. Sometimes those gamepads are not optimal. I bought my brother-in-law Borderlands 2 on PS3 for Christmas. I got to play it for roughly 3 hours, before purchasing myself the game on PC the same day. Playing at 720p, no PhysX enabled, no AA, and screen tearing all over the place was rough. It looked terrible. Firing up the PC version literally within minutes of turning the PS3 off it was night and day difference.
While I agree that graphics don't necessarily at times make a game great, they are an important key in helping the total package. |
|
 BlitzenZeusBurnt Out CynicPremium join:2000-01-13 kudos:2 Reviews:
·Frontier FiOS
| I'm not that picky, I thought Borderland 2 was fine on the Xbox 360 except for game mechanics like bullets that are supposed to travel faster than they were. Many non-explosive bullets were easily seen moving even missing their moving targets including the sniper rifle which should easily be faster than the speed of sound in real life. I care more about details like that than how things look. -- I distrust those people who know so well what god wants them to do because I notice it always coincides with their own desires- Susan B. Anthony Yesterday we obeyed kings, and bent out necks before emperors. But today we kneel only to the truth- Kahlil G. |
|
 KrisnatharokCaveat EmptorPremium join:2009-02-11 Earth Orbit kudos:7 | reply to BlitzenZeus said by BlitzenZeus:You don't play a game for the graphics, you play it as it's fun. People who rate a game on it's graphics first usually make bad choices, and we all have some old favorites we would play again today if it wasn't for legacy support issues, just for fun even if the graphics didn't even compare to the 8xAA some people expect today.
I like the control of the keyboard, and mouse. I've done games on the pc for years, and on the console. Sometimes those gamepads are not optimal. Console games aren't known for their depth of gameplay. Hell, they are the force responsible for pushing QTE onto PC games.
SMASH X!!!!!!!!!! -- Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase a little Temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety. |
|
 pandoraPremium join:2001-06-01 Outland kudos:1 Reviews:
·Google Voice
·Comcast
·ooma
·Future Nine Corp..
| reply to davidhoffman said by davidhoffman:RAID 0 15,000 rpm hard drives, and dual NVIDIA 6000 graphics cards. Their old computers were 6 to 8 years old and took 60 minutes to do CAM analysis. Now it takes 20 minutes. Hi Dave,
In your post, two things surprised me (and are quoted above). Running a CAD / CAM system in a commercial environment should be profitable, 8 year old hardware? Yike.
The 2nd thing was 15,000 RPM mechanical drives. The day when mechanical drives could beat an SSD are over. Maybe for backup, or media, but for work in progress, SSD over mechanical any day imo.
CAD / CAM, video editors, and a lot of engineers will need workstations ... I'm not certain how different / viable the workstation market is vs the gaming market. -- "If you put the federal government in charge of the Sahara Desert, in 5 years there'd be a shortage of sand." - Milton Friedman" |
|
 pandoraPremium join:2001-06-01 Outland kudos:1 Reviews:
·Google Voice
·Comcast
·ooma
·Future Nine Corp..
| reply to BlitzenZeus said by BlitzenZeus:It's not just about 60 fps, over 40+ is good, and most monitors can't even display more than 60, it's not the video cards creating the limitation. That is also why some people buy 120Hz monitors on purpose, or use a hdtv capable of displaying 120-240Hz. My understanding is the limit is 60 Hz for HDMI today. In the future that may change. A 120, 240 or 480 Hz HDTV is only creating more images between the 60 FPS signal provided it.
I don't know of any HDTV available to me (or a video card) that could really provide 240 or 480 Hz over the HDMI signal. Even if they could, I doubt my eyes could discern 120 vs 240 vs 480 on almost anything.
I'd like a decent 1080 or 1200 x 1980 HDMI video card capable of providing 3D 60 FPS at high settings on any game my PC is likely to play into the intermediate future. After 60 FPS, it's tougher for me to justify spending a lot more on a card, particularly if it's going to create heat, noise or use a lot more electricity. -- "If you put the federal government in charge of the Sahara Desert, in 5 years there'd be a shortage of sand." - Milton Friedman" |
|
 GhastlyonePremium join:2009-01-07 Las Vegas, NV kudos:2 1 edit | From what I've read, it all depends on the HDMI cable you purchase. High speed HDMI cables for version 1.4 support 120/240hz refresh rates, 3D and ethernet.
So PC gamers running 120hz monitors are probably using high speed cables also.
edit: Actually, after reading some more, it looks as though to game at 1080p resolutions @ 120hz refresh rates you should be running Display Port connections instead. They support a much higher bandwith. |
|
 Reviews:
·Millenicom
·AT&T Southeast
·Verizon Wireless..
| reply to pandora The corporate rules states that all regular desktops and work stations are to be replaced on a 3 or 4 year schedule. They have a big chart as to who is to get what and when. But you have to buy from a corporate approved list of models and options. The company does big purchases every year and gets bulk purchase discounts. The IT manager for our CAM programmers wanted to optimize the not connected to the internet workstations and servers with special configurations for reliability and speed of backup. This was at odds with certain persons goal, in our subsidiary, of getting a reward for keeping IT configurations to the lowest cost versions with zero exceptions. In the end, the CAM IT man won the repeated appeals about the need to allow for very high end workstations. The corporate purchasers negotiated to have these included in this years bulk buy options. So now any CAM or similar office in the company can purchase these from the standard yearly option sheet.
As far as solid state drives, he has looked at them closely, as the CAM and engineering staff asks each year for him to review them for use. He says they are too costly on a per GB basis even with the discounts we get. The other issue is reliability in a very rapid continuous read-write environment. All CAM programming is presently continuously backed up to a Dell server and a NetApps device. You can have your CAM workstation completely fail, and all of your various CAM program choices for a part, done that day, are available on the NetApps and the server. He says the SSDs available from the purchase option list are not yet reliable enough to survive in that environment, and it is not worth fighting to get better ones added. The 4 year workstation battle was draining enough. He says he might battle for them in the 2020 or 2024 purchase, depending on how their overall performance value increases. We trust his judgement, as he was one of a few who warned our subsidiary about not purchasing plasma monitors and displays when we replaced CRT monitors. Image retention, heat, reliability and energy usage became big issues for those who bought plasma monitors compared to those who bought LCDs. He also has helped design better fiber optic configurations and networks for each of our buildings than the IT head engineers. |
|
 pandoraPremium join:2001-06-01 Outland kudos:1 Reviews:
·Google Voice
·Comcast
·ooma
·Future Nine Corp..
| reply to Ghastlyone said by Ghastlyone:edit: Actually, after reading some more, it looks as though to game at 1080p resolutions @ 120hz refresh rates you should be running Display Port connections instead. They support a much higher bandwith. I look at Wikipedia, and see all HDMI listed as supporting up to 60 FPS. - »en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HDMI#Version_1.4
Maybe a monitor with displayport could run better, but I don't think any traditional HDMI display is going to work much faster than 60 FPS from the video card. -- "If you put the federal government in charge of the Sahara Desert, in 5 years there'd be a shortage of sand." - Milton Friedman" |
|
 Da Man join:2008-05-08 Hanover, PA | Dual link DVI/HDMI has enough bandwidth for 1920x1200@120FPS (that's 308MHZ of bandwidth with reduced blanking) . You need display port to do >=2560*1440. |
|
 KrisnatharokCaveat EmptorPremium join:2009-02-11 Earth Orbit kudos:7 | reply to pandora said by pandora:I'm not certain how different / viable the workstation market is vs the gaming market. The gaming market is a luxury/entertainment market, and people will pay good money for the best.
As any entertainment market goes, it can be one of the first to feel the hurt when money is scarce in a bad economy, but surprisingly, the growth of the market is vastly outpacing individual cutbacks market members may be taking. -- Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase a little Temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety. |
|
 pandoraPremium join:2001-06-01 Outland kudos:1 Reviews:
·Google Voice
·Comcast
·ooma
·Future Nine Corp..
| reply to Da Man I looked at your link, and it seems to be discussing DVI not HDMI or display port.
At the moment (and since 2008) all displays used in my home have been HDMI. The only distinction a GPU would likely notice has been 1080 x 1920 or 1200 x 1920 resolution. FPS has always been 60.
I suspect if video frame rates from a source to a destination were better at 120 / 240 or 480 FPS, HDMI would support it. -- "If you put the federal government in charge of the Sahara Desert, in 5 years there'd be a shortage of sand." - Milton Friedman" |
|