Reviews:
 ·Anveo
| reply to OZO
Re: SIP forwarding said by OZO:It's not "Call Forwarding". They called it "SIP URI" routing.
"SIP URI" routing is billed using usual incoming rates and not free.
Yes, I don't think anything you have written here conflicts with anything I have posted in this thread.
--
DPC3825 (bridged mode) - WRT610N + Tomato - Panasonic KX-TGP500 - Asterisk 11.0.2 on Virtual Server
Anveo - FreePhoneLine - Voxbeam - Numbergroup - Callcentric - VoIP.MS - Localphone - UKDDI |
|
OZOPremium
join:2003-01-17
kudos:2 | I was under the impression, that you have mentioned "Call Forwarding", while you actually meant "SIP URI" routing...
--
Keep it simple, it'll become complex by itself... |
|
Reviews:
·Anveo
| said by OZO:I was under the impression, that you have mentioned "Call Forwarding", while you actually meant "SIP URI" routing...
 I thought you were confusing the two and went along with your vocabulary.
--
DPC3825 (bridged mode) - WRT610N + Tomato - Panasonic KX-TGP500 - Asterisk 11.0.2 on Virtual Server
Anveo - FreePhoneLine - Voxbeam - Numbergroup - Callcentric - VoIP.MS - Localphone - UKDDI |
|
|
|
PX EliezerPremium
join:2008-08-09
Hutt River
kudos:13 Reviews:
·callwithus
·voip.ms
·Optimum Voice
·Vitelity VOIP
·Gizmo5
| reply to OZO
said by OZO:"SIP URI" routing is billed using usual incoming rates and not free.
No, it is billed at a [very small] charge.
cf:
»What is the voip.ms sip url? |
|
 Arne BolenHappy Anveo customerPremium
join:2009-06-21
Planet Earth
kudos:4
·Anveo
·callwithus
·Callcentric
·voip.ms
| reply to ConstantineM
Re: Alternative to voip.ms ? said by ConstantineM:P.S. It's surprising noone ever mentions pbxes.org on this forum. I wish I would have found them earlier. PBXes has often been mentioned on this forum by many members including myself. 
--
My VoIP News |
|
SCADAGeo
join:2012-11-08
N California
kudos:1 | reply to PX Eliezer
Re: SIP forwarding When I tested VoIP.MS's inbound SIP, I did it without funding my account, so it appears as if it the inbound SIP calls are free - don't know if this is still true...
Outbound calls, even to extensions on sub-accounts, requires a funded account, but there is no cost for the call. |
|
PX EliezerPremium
join:2008-08-09
Hutt River
kudos:13 Reviews:
·callwithus
·voip.ms
·Optimum Voice
·Vitelity VOIP
·Gizmo5
| said by SCADAGeo:When I tested VoIP.MS's inbound SIP, I did it without funding my account, so it appears as if it the inbound SIP calls are free - don't know if this is still true...
If it is done by creating a Virtual SIP number and using that as an inbound SIP, there is a nominal fee:
Monthly fee is $0.25 (25 cents) / month per active Virtual SIP number. Incoming calls are billed $0.001 (one tenth of a cent) per minute.
HOWEVER, a method that is quite similar (using a subaccount to make an internal extension, and using that internal extension as an inbound SIP, appears to be [free]. Their website PREVIOUSLY talked about a charge of one-tenth of a cent per minute for THIS method, but now the language is gone.
»www.voip.ms/m/subaccount.php |
|
SCADAGeo
join:2012-11-08
N California
kudos:1 | said by PX Eliezer:If it is done by creating a Virtual SIP number and using that as an inbound SIP, there is a nominal fee:
Monthly fee is $0.25 (25 cents) / month per active Virtual SIP number. Incoming calls are billed $0.001 (one tenth of a cent) per minute.
» www.voip.ms/m/virtualnumbers.phpHOWEVER, a method that is quite similar (using a subaccount to make an internal extension, and using that internal extension as an inbound SIP, appears to be [free]. Their website PREVIOUSLY talked about a charge of one-tenth of a cent per minute for THIS method, but now the language is gone. » www.voip.ms/m/subaccount.php I used sub-accounts for testing, and I wasn't aware of the first method. Thanks for the clarification. |
|
