republican-creole
site Search:


 
    All Forums Hot Topics Gallery






how-to block ads


 
Search Topic:
Uniqs:
2231
Share Topic
Posting?
Post a:
Post a:
Links: ·VZ FiOS TV FAQ ·Submit a FAQ ·Is it 1080p? ·Frontier
page: 1 · 2
AuthorAll Replies


stevek1949
We're not in Kansas anymore

join:2002-11-13
Virginia Beach, VA

Al Jazeera Buys Al Gore's Current TV

Al Jazeera on Wednesday announced a deal to take over Current TV, the low-rated cable channel that was founded by Al Gore, a former vice president, and his business partners seven years ago.

Current is presently part of the Verizon line-up.

»mediadecoder.blogs.nytimes.com/2···rent-tv/


Keano

join:2012-03-14
South Grafton, MA

I won't miss it. Current used to be good 2-3 years ago. Deadliest Journeys and Vanguard were both excellent series. Then it became the channel of CNN & MSNBC rejects. One lame talking head after another all day long. Joy Behar??? Hopefully Verizon won't drop it like TWC just did.



nascar

join:2000-02-28
Verona, NJ
kudos:2

reply to stevek1949

Re: Al Jazeera Buys Al Gore's Current TV

I hope they do drop it.

PJL

join:2008-07-24
Long Beach, CA
kudos:2

I hope they keep it.


Mac973

join:2009-05-18
West Orange, NJ

reply to stevek1949
Drop it.



Jackarino
Premium
join:2006-12-28
Allendale, NJ
kudos:1

reply to stevek1949
I don't watch it so, idc


billhere

join:2011-10-21
Santa Monica, CA

I watched Current once or twice when Keith was still there.

It's not an HD channel so I won't miss it if it's dropped.



Webcobbler

@verizon.net

reply to nascar
I agree. Drop the channel. I never wanted to watch it, ever. It's a useless channel in my opinion.



bohratom
Jersey Shore will rise again

join:2011-07-07
Red Bank NJ

reply to stevek1949
Never watched , wont watch it...don't care...


Acct101

join:2011-09-20
Bensalem, PA

reply to stevek1949
I hope they drop it.


chitchatjf

join:2008-07-13
Lawrence, MA

reply to stevek1949

Re: Al Jazeera Buys Al Gore's Current TV

put me on the list of folks who say drop it.


somebodeez
Premium,MVM
join:2001-09-24
here

reply to stevek1949
»Time Warner Cable Drops Current TV



Greg2600

join:2008-05-20
Belleville, NJ

reply to stevek1949
Verizon cannot drop a channel on the spot, it depends on when the contract is up.

However, that TW article is important because you're going to see more and more of that. Non-sports will be dropped because of the massive sports fees. Which is why I have been so against BeIN and PAC-12, etc.



nascar

join:2000-02-28
Verona, NJ
kudos:2

reply to stevek1949
I want BeIN though, same owner, but it's Futbol.


PJL

join:2008-07-24
Long Beach, CA
kudos:2
Reviews:
·Verizon FiOS

reply to Greg2600

said by Greg2600:

Verizon cannot drop a channel on the spot, it depends on when the contract is up.

...

Not necessarily. The Time Warner contract had a clause that allowed dropping the channel if the channel's ownership changed, which is what happened. Verizon's contract may have a similar clause.

Time Warner didn't want to pay and charge their customers for a channel that had a free Internet feed, which Al Jazeera has, including Windows 8 and Android apps to access the live feed that work well (beyond web browser access).


bohratom
Jersey Shore will rise again

join:2011-07-07
Red Bank NJ

said by PJL:

Not necessarily. The Time Warner contract had a clause that allowed dropping the channel if the channel's ownership changed, which is what happened. Verizon's contract may have a similar clause.

They also can sever a contract if the programming changes dramatically as it will in this case.

PJL

join:2008-07-24
Long Beach, CA
kudos:2
Reviews:
·Verizon FiOS

said by bohratom:

said by PJL:

Not necessarily. The Time Warner contract had a clause that allowed dropping the channel if the channel's ownership changed, which is what happened. Verizon's contract may have a similar clause.

They also can sever a contract if the programming changes dramatically as it will in this case.

Again, it depends solely on the terms and conditions of the individual contract. A contract would define the specific conditions which allow a party to terminate the contract, and unless "dramatic program changes" is a clause (which I doubt it would be unless "dramatic" was clearly defined), then a "dramatic program change" wouldn't allow terminating the contract.

Monday, 20-May 04:59:50 Terms of Use & Privacy | feedback | contact | Hosting by nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo
over 13.5 years online © 1999-2013 dslreports.com.
Most commented news this week
Hot Topics