
how-to block ads
|
|
Share Topic  |
 |
|
|
|
 | reply to aefstoggaflm
Re: [speed/latency] Verizon Speed Slow at times Sorry for the late response. I was on vacations for two weeks. But I'm back now.
news.giganews.com
traceroute to XX.XXX.XX.XX (IP Address), 30 hops max, 60 byte packets 1 gw1-g-vlan201.dca.giganews.com (216.196.98.4) 0 ms 0 ms 0 ms 2 te0-0-0-7.mpd22.iad02.atlas.cogentco.com (38.122.67.49) 0 ms 0 ms 0 ms 3 te0-2-0-0.ccr21.iad02.atlas.cogentco.com (154.54.31.101) 0 ms te0-0-0-4.ccr21.iad02.atlas.cogentco.com (154.54.31.105) 0 ms 0 ms 4 verizon.iad01.atlas.cogentco.com (154.54.12.46) 11 ms uunet.iad01.atlas.cogentco.com (154.54.13.138) 11 ms verizon.iad01.atlas.cogentco.com (154.54.10.226) 72 ms 5 0.ae2.RES-BB-RTR1.verizon-gni.net (152.63.34.22) 78 ms 78 ms 0.ae1.RES-BB-RTR1.verizon-gni.net (152.63.32.142) 42 ms 6 B100.LSANCA-LCR-22.verizon-gni.net (130.81.22.247) 85 ms P0-15-0-0.LSANCA-LCR-21.verizon-gni.net (130.81.151.247) 112 ms P1-0-0-0.LSANCA-LCR-21.verizon-gni.net (130.81.199.39) 114 ms 7 G2-0.LSANCA-DSL-72.verizon-gni.net (130.81.195.79) 86 ms G4-0.LSANCA-DSL-72.verizon-gni.net (130.81.195.77) 115 ms G2-0.LSANCA-DSL-72.verizon-gni.net (130.81.195.79) 86 ms 8 * * * 9 * * * 10 * * * 11 * * * 12 * * * 13 * * * 14 * * * 15 * * * 16 * * * 17 * * * 18 * * Max number of unresponsive hops reached (firewall or filter?)
news-europe.giganews.com
traceroute to XX.XXX.XX.XX (IP Address), 30 hops max, 60 byte packets 1 vl201.gw1.ams.giganews.com (216.196.110.3) 0 ms 1 ms 1 ms 2 te7-7.ccr01.ams05.atlas.cogentco.com (149.11.104.9) 1 ms 1 ms te7-8.ccr01.ams05.atlas.cogentco.com (149.11.104.17) 1 ms 3 te0-5-0-1.ccr21.ams03.atlas.cogentco.com (154.54.72.42) 1 ms te0-3-0-6.mpd21.ams03.atlas.cogentco.com (130.117.0.85) 1 ms te0-5-0-1.mpd21.ams03.atlas.cogentco.com (154.54.72.46) 2 ms 4 te0-4-0-0.mpd21.lon13.atlas.cogentco.com (154.54.60.201) 80 ms te0-3-0-0.ccr21.lon13.atlas.cogentco.com (130.117.48.141) 82 ms te0-4-0-0.ccr21.lon13.atlas.cogentco.com (154.54.60.197) 83 ms 5 te0-7-0-10.ccr21.jfk02.atlas.cogentco.com (154.54.44.225) 84 ms te0-0-0-10.mpd21.jfk02.atlas.cogentco.com (154.54.44.233) 83 ms 83 ms 6 te0-1-0-3.ccr22.jfk05.atlas.cogentco.com (154.54.6.46) 83 ms te0-2-0-1.ccr22.jfk05.atlas.cogentco.com (154.54.47.2) 82 ms te0-2-0-1.ccr21.jfk05.atlas.cogentco.com (154.54.46.250) 80 ms 7 te0-1-0-0.ccr21.jfk05.atlas.cogentco.com (154.54.3.106) 82 ms 0.xe-10-3-0.BR2.NYC4.ALTER.NET (204.255.168.113) 87 ms te0-1-0-0.ccr21.jfk05.atlas.cogentco.com (154.54.3.106) 82 ms 8 0.xe-1-1-1.NY325-BB-RTR2.verizon-gni.net (152.63.1.206) 84 ms 0.xe-3-3-0.NY5030-BB-RTR1.verizon-gni.net (152.63.18.30) 84 ms 0.xe-1-1-1.NY325-BB-RTR2.verizon-gni.net (152.63.1.206) 85 ms 9 B200.LSANCA-LCR-22.verizon-gni.net (130.81.22.239) 163 ms 163 ms 162 ms 10 B200.LSANCA-LCR-22.verizon-gni.net (130.81.22.239) 164 ms G2-0.LSANCA-DSL-72.verizon-gni.net (130.81.195.79) 168 ms B200.LSANCA-LCR-22.verizon-gni.net (130.81.22.239) 164 ms 11 G4-0.LSANCA-DSL-72.verizon-gni.net (130.81.195.77) 164 ms 166 ms G2-0.LSANCA-DSL-72.verizon-gni.net (130.81.195.79) 167 ms 12 * * * 13 * * * 14 * * * 15 * * * 16 * * * 17 * * * 18 * * * 19 * * * 20 * * * 21 * * * 22 * * Max number of unresponsive hops reached (firewall or filter?)
I used the first method you mentioned.
Transceiver Statistics
Transceiver Revision: 7.2.3.0 Vendor ID Code: 4 Line Mode: G.DMT Mode Data Path: Interleaved Transceiver Information Downstream Path Upstream Path DSL Speed (Kbits/Sec) 5952 864 Margin (dB) 8.5 11.0 Line Attenuation (dB) 38.0 23.0 Transmit Power (dBm) 19.3 11.9
| |  aefstoggaflmOpen Source FanPremium join:2002-03-04 Bethlehem, PA kudos:2 Reviews:
·Verizon Online DSL
| Ok.
#1 An original or very old style NID with a spark gap and ground wire can even get spiders in it that could cause an issue. Inspect the NID first before thinking of changes or wiring.
»en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Network_in···e_device
»en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demarcation_point
Running a good quality wire CAT5, no need for CAT6, directly to the NID for the DSL modem jack may help. That is what I had done with mine. Depending on the number of loads or amount of wire in the house could also cause issues. But if the user's signal quality is not being pulled low due to a wiring issues, it would usually indicate a problem elsewhere. Unless there was noise being picked up on the premises wiring. Wire DSL directly to the NID and install a filter there for all other in house wiring may help. There used to be available what was called a NID Filter, and I am sure you can still get them.
Ideal Connection if house wiring is an issue, or very old, and lengthy. Install a filter / splitter at the NID.
Run CAT5 directly to the NID location, and install a dedicated jack for the DSL modem.
Remove all in house wiring from the NID.
Connect piece of CAT5 from the NID to the filter / splitter input
Connect all existing phone lines to the phone side of the filter output.
Connect the new DSL CAT5 directly to the NID before the filter / splitter, or to the DSL side of the filter / splitter, depending on the device purchased.
This will take all the existing premises wiring out of the picture unless there is a short circuit or excessive load somewhere in the house.
At this point all the single filters could be removed because the DSL is filtered at the NID.
»www.homephonewiring.com/dsl.html
#2 You can test outbound to Giganews. But giganews has/had a test that will check your inbound connection from their servers to you.
I heard from another user that quote: Giganews is being watched very closely because of multipart binaries, and pirated material. MP3s and Video Content. 7 years ago you could get 10-20 MP3 albums in a single day, and that was with a 15/5 fios connection. So they started providing an encrypted connection service for an added fee. I have not messed with news groups for a very long time. Now with deep packet inspection, and other enforcement, I would not even think of it. No news I want there. But there may be content that people want? They may even be checking and limiting speed from that domain. Never tested. But let me see. It looks as if reverse trace routes and speed tests are being blocked by Verizon from Giganews to my router.
Reverse Traceroute
Tool news.giganews.com
traceroute to *.*.*.*, 30 hops max, 60 byte packets 1 gw1-g-vlan201.dca.giganews.com (216.196.98.4) 0 ms 0 ms 0 ms 2 te0-0-0-7.mpd22.iad02.atlas.cogentco.com (38.122.67.49) 0 ms 0 ms te0-7-0-9.mpd22.iad02.atlas.cogentco.com (38.122.62.193) 0 ms 3 te0-0-0-4.ccr21.iad02.atlas.cogentco.com (154.54.31.105) 0 ms 0 ms te0-2-0-0.ccr21.iad02.atlas.cogentco.com (154.54.31.101) 0 ms 4 uunet.iad01.atlas.cogentco.com (154.54.13.138) 28 ms verizon.iad01.atlas.cogentco.com (154.54.10.226) 40 ms uunet.iad01.atlas.cogentco.com (154.54.13.138) 28 ms 5 0.ae1.RES-BB-RTR2.verizon-gni.net (152.63.32.157) 41 ms 41 ms 0.ae2.RES-BB-RTR1.verizon-gni.net (152.63.34.22) 13 ms 6 * * * 7 * * * 8 * * * 9 * * * 10 * * * 11 * * * 12 * * * 13 * * * 14 * * * 15 * * * 16 * * Max number of unresponsive hops reached (firewall or filter?)
#3 Have the provider run a local loop test to see if any problems are indicated. If there are, then they could run the test with everything in the house disconnected, except the new DSL modem connection. If issues are still indicated, then the DSL provider needs to make connections on the local loop. Another user told me that they had issues when it rained, and it was because construction had left a splice box open on a line somewhere. -- Please use the "yellow (IM) envelope" to contact me and please leave the URL intact. | |  | Ok.
Based on the information I have provided, how is my DSL connection? Based on the Transceiver Statistics, is it fine or it can be improved? I'm sorry, but I'm a noob understanding the Transceiver Statistics of the modem.
Do you recommend getting CAT5 or CAT5e ? Any specific cable out there that you would recommend? (Price is not a concern, I'm willing to pay for it if it can benefit my DSL connection)
Also, any recommendations for a DSL splitter or any device will do its job?
Lastly, having a provider run a local loop test would be ideal. In order to know if there are any other problems with my line. If there isn't, then that would be good news. Correct? So I would just call Verizon, ask them to run a local loop test. Would they understand what I'm trying to accomplish? | | |
|
|