ropeguru Premium Member join:2001-01-25 Mechanicsville, VA |
ropeguru
Premium Member
2013-Jan-8 8:31 am
Question about Comcast's speedtest sitesSo the other day I was using Comcast's speed test sites just to see what kind of rates I get from different parts of the Country.
One thing I found unusual was that the latency showing during the test was really high in some cases. For example when the test started from the Miami site, the test was showing 355ms of latency. So me being the curious type, I fired up wireshark and determined the IP that the test was running from so I could do a trace route to see where the latency issue was occurring. To my surprise, I had less than 50ms latency to the IP the test was being run from.
So my questions i just how is the latency for the speed test determined? Anyone know? |
|
Extide join:2000-06-11 Salt Lake City, UT |
Extide
Member
2013-Jan-8 12:16 pm
Those flash based speed tests are notoriously in-accurate, so it is probably just a badly measured latency number. |
|
bradyrYCCD - Network Operations Premium Member join:2008-10-27 Sonora, CA (Software) pfSense Netgear CM1200 Ubiquiti UAP-AC-HD
|
to ropeguru
if you want to do a real speed test, find a NDT server in your area and test against that (lots of universities host them). if you're looking for a good speed test that takes your powerboost into account, do the shaperprobe thing.
otherwise, just download a big file from somewhere like microsoft or grab one of the linux distro's. use a calculator and determine your own real-world speeds.
I also wouldn't worry about the latency reports on the speedtest servers, either. if you're concerned about latency, pick some of your favorite websites and do some ping and trace-route testing. |
|
whfsdude Premium Member join:2003-04-05 Washington, DC |
to ropeguru
NDT or Iperf |
|
|
to ropeguru
Does it always do it? It could have been a brief busy time when it was checking the latency. |
|
ropeguru Premium Member join:2001-01-25 Mechanicsville, VA |
ropeguru
Premium Member
2013-Jan-8 1:56 pm
said by andyross:Does it always do it? It could have been a brief busy time when it was checking the latency. At the time I was testing I got the same results over a 10 minute period. And during each test I had a ping going to the test server and when the test would run, the ping would be in the 50ms range but the test was saying 300+ms. |
|
NetFixerFrom My Cold Dead Hands Premium Member join:2004-06-24 The Boro Netgear CM500 Pace 5268AC TRENDnet TEW-829DRU
|
NetFixer
Premium Member
2013-Jan-8 3:03 pm
said by ropeguru:said by andyross:Does it always do it? It could have been a brief busy time when it was checking the latency. At the time I was testing I got the same results over a 10 minute period. And during each test I had a ping going to the test server and when the test would run, the ping would be in the 50ms range but the test was saying 300+ms. The difference is likely that the test is using imbedded results taken from inside the HTTP/TCP packets used in the test itself, and the latency reported by the test would depend greatly on how much load that server was under (you probably aren't the only one running a test at any given time) Your ping test is using the ICMP echo which requires very little of the server's resources. |
|
|
to ropeguru
Here an NDT server site run bu Rutgers » ndt-nbp.rutgers.edu/ |
|