 TSI MarcPremium,VIP
join:2006-06-23
Chatham, ON
kudos:16 | reply to hm
Re: Voltage Versus Teksavvy, Round 2 Continued Still no draft. |
|
 hm
@videotron.ca | reply to resa1983
NICE!
Any link to the judges ruling? Shake Geist up a bit to get a link. 
And still no Draft given to Teksavvy? |
|
resa1983Premium
join:2008-03-10
North York, ON
kudos:7 Reviews:
 ·TekSavvy Cable
| reply to TSI Marc
Not surprising. We all know they don't want people to stop sharing, cuz it means they might be able to sue more people.
That would be a good thing to bring up during the next hearing.. lol.
--
Battle.net Tech Support MVP |
|
hm
@videotron.ca | reply to TSI Marc
:/
Ty For the reply Marc.. |
|
TSI MarcPremium,VIP
join:2006-06-23
Chatham, ON
kudos:16 | reply to hm
We'll have the doc up shortly on our site: »www.teksavvy.com/en/why-teksavvy···ormation
--
Marc - CEO/TekSavvy |
|
hm
@videotron.ca | reply to resa1983
said by resa1983:That would be a good thing to bring up during the next hearing.. lol.
OoOoOhH I'm sure they will.
heh
It shows volumes. |
|
hm
@videotron.ca | reply to TSI Marc
TY! |
|
TSI MarcPremium,VIP
join:2006-06-23
Chatham, ON
kudos:16 | reply to hm
We highlighted similar behavior in court last time... I.e. they could have asked for this at any time since the beginning..
--
Marc - CEO/TekSavvy |
|
resa1983Premium
join:2008-03-10
North York, ON
kudos:7 Reviews:
·TekSavvy Cable
| said by TSI Marc:We highlighted similar behavior in court last time... I.e. they could have asked for this at any time since the beginning..
Especially considering they wrote the original letter that went out to customers.. They could have added it to that.
--
Battle.net Tech Support MVP |
|
TSI MarcPremium,VIP
join:2006-06-23
Chatham, ON
kudos:16 | Exactly! |
|
hm
@videotron.ca | reply to TSI Marc
Yup. I recall the lawyer bringing that up. Think he even raised his voice at them if I recall right.
Yet, they continue to not bother... |
|
|
|
hm
@videotron.ca | The link/PDF:
CIPPIC Intervenor Status Granted
»www.teksavvy.com/Media/Default/C···nted.PDF |
|
hm
@videotron.ca | reply to hm
It should also be noted, since Teksavvy submitted their costs *to date*, American lobby groups are now attacking Canada for their statutory damages being to low (5,000$).
»www.michaelgeist.ca/content/view/6784/125/
Coincidence? I think not. |
|
Reviews:
 ·Bell Fibe
 ·ELECTRONICBOX
| said by hm :It should also be noted, since Teksavvy submitted their costs *to date*, American lobby groups are now attacking Canada for their statutory damages being to low (5,000$).
»www.michaelgeist.ca/content/view/6784/125/
Coincidence? I think not.
wow lol |
|
 AkFubarAdmittedly, A Teksavvy Fan
join:2005-02-28
Toronto CAN.
·TekSavvy DSL
| reply to hm
said by hm :It should also be noted, since Teksavvy submitted their costs *to date*, American lobby groups are now attacking Canada for their statutory damages being to low (5,000$).
»www.michaelgeist.ca/content/view/6784/125/
Coincidence? I think not.
That goes to show it is not about protecting copyrights but all about the money. It should be noted that they have not been very successful recently in recovering the big $ they seek in US courts either.
--
BHell... A Public Futility. |
|
hm
@videotron.ca | An Aussie economist put out a paper a couple of years ago showing that it's only a money funnel system to the USA. |
|
booj
join:2011-02-07
Richmond, ON | reply to hm
Great news involving CIPPIC's right to intervene. Here's hoping some of the blowback TSI got from their position in this case will diminish. |
|
| said by booj:Great news involving CIPPIC's right to intervene. Here's hoping some of the blowback TSI got from their position in this case will diminish.
agreed...Although things are far from over yet, I'm sure this was part of "the plan" from the start  |
|
hm
@videotron.ca | reply to hm
So What's going to happen now?
Does CIPPIC have to draft and submit what it plans to examine?
Or do they wait for a judge to pick it up and it hit court right away?
What is to happen now?
When?
Any other info besides this latest news? |
|
hm
@videotron.ca | reply to TSI Marc
Marc,
During the last court hearing your lawyer brought up the fact that (I'm paraphrasing), Voltage dropped their lawsuits in Quebec against people, stating they only intended to send the extortion letters.
Voltages lawyer turned around and claimed they did not and wanted to know where he heard that.
Your lawyer stated it was in the press.
Voltages lawyer never replied on the subject again at the hearing.
So my Question:
Do you, or your lawyers, or CIPPIC know the status of the Quebec lawsuits? Was it indeed dropped?
I seem to recall this as well. Pretty sure it would have been in this topic with a link, if it were true (the one where I found one of the IP's belong to the Montreal Canadians): » Hurt Locker P2P Lawsuit Comes to Canada, but, a quick look shows nothing, unless I missed it in that books of comments.
Any info on that one? Or any ref to the press release and/or media story your lawyer referred to? |
|
