Topic 'Re: Voltage Versus Teksavvy, Round 2 Continued' in forum 'Canadian Broadband' - dslreports.com

Re: Voltage Versus Teksavvy, Round 2 Continued

Mon, 13 May 2013 13:26:29 EDT

Nitra posted : »www.pcinpact.com/news/56419-adre···fuck.htm
»www.pcinpact.com/news/57449-seed···dopi.htm

Enough said.

Re: Voltage Versus Teksavvy, Round 2 Continued

Sun, 12 May 2013 23:37:59 EDT

cantthink posted : Looks they are continuing with this...

»www.ippractice.ca/file-browser/?···-2058-12

2013-05-10 - Toronto

Letter from Plaintiff dated 09-MAY-2013 confirming that they are allowed to file supplementary materials in response to the materials filed by the intervener. received on 10-MAY-2013

Re: Voltage Versus Teksavvy, Round 2 Continued

Sun, 12 May 2013 23:29:09 EDT

anon posted :

said by TwiztedZero:

Now we just need a nice smart upstanding Canadian Justice version of Judge Otis Wright and destroy Canipre (Voltage) much the same way Judge Wright tore Prenda apart.

I mean geez comparing the trolling model with the RICO statutes is BIG time.

That is only because one judge from only one lawsuit in only one state caught on, or had an understanding.

Meanwhile there are a dozen other states with two dozen other judges who never caught on, or are clueless and don't question a thing or look at a thing other than the BS someone tosses at them.

It's no different here.

Re: Voltage Versus Teksavvy, Round 2 Continued

Sun, 12 May 2013 17:13:31 EDT

TwiztedZero posted : Now we just need a nice smart upstanding Canadian Justice version of Judge Otis Wright and destroy Canipre (Voltage) much the same way Judge Wright tore Prenda apart.

I mean geez comparing the trolling model with the RICO statutes is BIG time.
--
----|- From the mind located in the shadows of infinity -|----
Nine.Zero.Burp.Nine.Six
Twitter = Twizted Zero
Chat = irc.teksavvy.ca

Re: Voltage Versus Teksavvy, Round 2 Continued

Sun, 12 May 2013 16:43:29 EDT

anon posted : It looks like trolls took all that time to prepare a BS counter arguments against CIPPC's doc that states IP =/= person. I wonder how trolls are going to explain absence of Cease and Desist letter. It simply shows that them (trolls) are not against sharing files no-line and in fact they need their crappy "works" shared on order to extort money from people

Re: Voltage Versus Teksavvy, Round 2 Continued

Sun, 12 May 2013 16:23:48 EDT

anon posted : Dunno. I thought this was to be the "sit down" stage that the judge ordered.

This (»cas-ncr-nter03.cas-satj.gc.ca/In···-2058-12) seems to indicate that CIPPIC filed something on May 10th that we aren't seeing and that voltage is replying to it. Unless Voltage means the affidavits CIPPIC gave about 3 months ago and they only got it now!

BTW, Back in i believe it was February, the judge told Voltage to give TSI a draft of the words of what they wanted to go out in Email to the accused (ie "the draft"). Did TSI ever get this draft finally from Voltage as the judge stated? Did this other Email/correspondence ever go out?

Re: Voltage Versus Teksavvy, Round 2 Continued

Sun, 12 May 2013 14:17:06 EDT

mazhurg posted : Here we go again, round 3?

»www.castanet.net/edition/news-st···tm#91890

Re: Voltage Versus Teksavvy, Round 2 Continued

Thu, 25 Apr 2013 11:44:03 EDT

resa1983 posted : They're actually in process of being smacked by a US Judge - this case was multiple cases with several hundred does, consolidated into 1 case.

quote:
Order to Show Cause. ordered to Show Cause in Writing by 4/22/2013 why this case should not be dismissed for failure to follow a court order and why defendants should not be severed, requiring the filing of individual complaints. Signed on 4/10/2013 by Chief Judge Ann L. Aiken. (lg) (Entered: 04/11/2013)

»ia801702.us.archive.org/1/items/···ket.html
--
Battle.net Tech Support MVP

Re: Voltage Versus Teksavvy, Round 2 Continued

Thu, 25 Apr 2013 11:29:36 EDT

MaynardKrebs posted :

said by HammerofGawd:

voltage needs to be smited from the Heavens.

Go for it, Thor.

Re: Voltage Versus Teksavvy, Round 2 Continued

Thu, 25 Apr 2013 11:27:15 EDT

HammerofGawd posted : voltage needs to be smited from the Heavens.

Re: Voltage Versus Teksavvy, Round 2 Continued

Thu, 18 Apr 2013 16:14:29 EDT

resa1983 posted : Yup..

And the WPS one that most manufacturers haven't bothered to update to protect against:
»www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/723755
--
Battle.net Tech Support MVP

Re: Voltage Versus Teksavvy, Round 2 Continued

Thu, 18 Apr 2013 15:42:40 EDT

MaynardKrebs posted : Add this as a plausible defense
»news.cnet.com/8301-1009_3-575799···s-study/

Re: Voltage Versus Teksavvy, Round 2 Continued

Thu, 18 Apr 2013 12:33:01 EDT

resa1983 posted : Still nothing.

Info is here:
»cas-ncr-nter03.cas-satj.gc.ca/In···-2058-12

Still waiting on the evidentiary hearing date.
--
Battle.net Tech Support MVP

Re: Voltage Versus Teksavvy, Round 2 Continued

Thu, 18 Apr 2013 11:27:26 EDT

anon posted : Are there any news regarding this BS? Evidence hearing dates set etc.?

Re: Voltage Versus Teksavvy, Round 2 Continued

Tue, 09 Apr 2013 19:22:00 EDT

anon posted :

said by Guspaz:

Voltage's latest victims: elderly ladies who haven't seen their films and who have never heard of BitTorrent.

Old retired people w/ good pensions are an extortionists wet-dream. All that untapped money from old people for unheard of lousy movies is good for the American economy.
¬¿¬

Re: Voltage Versus Teksavvy, Round 2 Continued

Tue, 09 Apr 2013 19:09:28 EDT

Guspaz posted : Voltage's latest victims: elderly ladies who haven't seen their films and who have never heard of BitTorrent.

»yro.slashdot.org/story/13/04/09/···lawsuits

»www.oregonlive.com/business/inde···lle.html
--
Developer: Tomato/MLPPP, Linux/MLPPP, etc »fixppp.org

Re: Voltage Versus Teksavvy, Round 2 Continued

Wed, 27 Mar 2013 09:28:10 EDT

resa1983 posted :

said by hm :

said by resa1983:

They don't plan on using all those days for this.

lol, um, I think I caught that. Just making note of the no down time except for about 3 weeks at the end of July.

Who knows.. That may be when Marc's already booked his vacation, which could be why his lawyers say they're not available. ;)
--
Battle.net Tech Support MVP

Re: Voltage Versus Teksavvy, Round 2 Continued

Wed, 27 Mar 2013 07:05:37 EDT

anon posted :

said by resa1983:

They don't plan on using all those days for this.

lol, um, I think I caught that. Just making note of the no down time except for about 3 weeks at the end of July.

Re: Voltage Versus Teksavvy, Round 2 Continued

Tue, 26 Mar 2013 23:27:08 EDT

resa1983 posted : They're just trying to find a single day that all parties are available for the 1 day hearing of the evidence.

They don't plan on using all those days for this.
--
Battle.net Tech Support MVP

Re: Voltage Versus Teksavvy, Round 2 Continued

Tue, 26 Mar 2013 22:36:34 EDT

anon posted : Any new news on TSI-CIPPIC Vs. the Vultures?

The only thing I see is that TSI (their council) said they are available to sit down with the vultures on:
Letter from Mr. McHaffie dated 20-MAR-2013 in regards to the party availability in April 22013 through to and including August 2013: April 1,4,5,8,9,10,24,25,26,29,30 May 20,21,22,24,27,28,29,30,31 June 3-7,10-14,18-21,24-28 July 2-5,8-12,15-19 August 12-16,19-23,26-30

Looks like Marc isn't taking a very long summer vacation. At least not between now and the end of Aug from the looks of it.

Re: Voltage Versus Teksavvy, Round 2 Continued

Mon, 18 Mar 2013 21:48:33 EDT

resa1983 posted : They'd filed a schedule (like TSI, CIPPIC & Voltage did, which is what's driving these potential dates now), and didn't stick to it. They were told to stick to schedule to name defendants, got an extension, missed it, lawyers filed on last date stating they were waiting to hear from their clients, who then dismissed it.

Google translate of the docket for those (like me) whose french stinks:
»translate.google.com/translate?s···-1373-11
--
Battle.net Tech Support MVP

Re: Voltage Versus Teksavvy, Round 2 Continued

Mon, 18 Mar 2013 19:44:10 EDT

anon posted :

said by resa1983:

due to lack of filing suit against named individuals within a reasonable amount of time.

Was that the reason? The time frame, or amount of time? Official reason?

Re: Voltage Versus Teksavvy, Round 2 Continued

Mon, 18 Mar 2013 19:24:54 EDT

resa1983 posted : Oh that one.. That was over & done with in 2012 due to lack of filing suit against named individuals within a reasonable amount of time. They kept getting extensions with court approval, til finally the last deadline came & went, and the lawyers hadn't heard from Voltage.. Few days later, it was dismissed.
--
Battle.net Tech Support MVP

Re: Voltage Versus Teksavvy, Round 2 Continued

Mon, 18 Mar 2013 19:22:08 EDT

anon posted :

said by resa1983:

said by hm :

Guess Voltage isn't backing out.

Wonder why they did in Quebec? Anyone know? Or best educated guess as to why they did?

As for Quebec:
NGN put the case on hold, pending the trying of the evidence in the Teksavvy case. If the evidence is tossed in the TSI case, lawyers for Distributel/Acanac/3web can bring up the TSI case and show how Canipre did evidence for both, and that it should be tossed in Distributel's case as well. No point in trying evidence in both places at the same time, doubling the costs.

I meant the other Quebec case involving Canipre & Voltage that they dropped. The one which included the Montreal Canadiens, and I believe the Airport Hilton in Dorval, along with a handful of individuals. Not the NGN one on hold.

I expect CIPPIC to bring this up. But I don't ever recall hearing why they dropped this Quebec lawsuit. The demand letters went out when they got the names, and then they (Voltage) filed to drop it. Which is the M.O. of these troll lawsuits as TSI's lawyer brought up (and to which Voltages lawyers claimed was never dropped, but court records show otherwise).

Re: Voltage Versus Teksavvy, Round 2 Continued

Mon, 18 Mar 2013 19:00:36 EDT

resa1983 posted : Not surprising really..

This schedule was agreed upon by TSI, CIPPIC & Voltage's lawyers back in January.

Voltage will only make money if this continues.. If they withdraw now that the evidence is going to be tried, it'll signal that they know it's bad, and lawyers can bring it up in any future suits. They *have* to let this play out and have the evidence tried. They'll be hoping to get a judge who doesn't understand technology, and who won't question their half-truths (some might say lies) given in their affidavits.

said by hm :

Guess Voltage isn't backing out.

Wonder why they did in Quebec? Anyone know? Or best educated guess as to why they did?

Re: Voltage Versus Teksavvy, Round 2 Continued

Mon, 18 Mar 2013 18:16:14 EDT

anon posted : Guess Voltage isn't backing out.

Wonder why they did in Quebec? Anyone know? Or best educated guess as to why they did?

Re: Voltage Versus Teksavvy, Round 2 Continued

Mon, 18 Mar 2013 13:49:56 EDT

anon posted : Update on a case. Source: COURT INDEX AND DOCKET

2013-03-18:

"Letter from Plaintiff (the troll) dated 15-MAR-2013 "A special sitting is required pursuant to paragraph 3 of the Order of the Honourable Justice Mandamin, dated Jaunuary 18, 2013....Counsel for all parties are available to atten on the following dates: June 20, 21, 24, 25, and 26." received on 18-MAR-2013"

»cas-ncr-nter03.cas-satj.gc.ca/In···-2058-12

Looks like Affidavit of Barry Logan goes under scrutiny. May the anti-troll force be with the Honourable Justice Mandamin, CIPPIC, Janes + Johns Doe and maybe TSI if they want to come around and fight for customers as they should. Its a great chance to tear a new one to Barry Logan and trolls.

Re: Voltage Versus Teksavvy, Round 2 Continued

Tue, 12 Mar 2013 20:14:51 EDT

shepd posted : Hopefully google news dumps the National Post, it's not uncommon for a headline to be 11 words long, after all.

Re: Voltage Versus Teksavvy, Round 2 Continued

Tue, 12 Mar 2013 19:33:16 EDT

anon posted : Another interesting copyright troll case is also going on in Canada. Last week Geist wrote of how the National Post wants to be paid if you copy a singe sentence from them (which goes against what the new copyright states about fair use).

Now the National Post is going after the Fourniers (their saga is well documented by Geist and other sites) for copying 11 words from their news site.

Knopf on it:
»www.excesscopyright.blogspot.ca/···nal.html

All this is contrary to what the new copyright laws states about fair dealing.

So this will also be a big one to watch out for. But I expect nothing to come of this till the end of the year, or even next year.

So in effect, if someone on this forum were to paste a paragraph on an interesting news item from the National post, they can/may/will go after both this site and the person (or try to) who quotes them, as they are doing with the Fourniers.

Re: Voltage Versus Teksavvy, Round 2 Continued

Tue, 12 Mar 2013 13:33:15 EDT

anon posted : Makes me wonder if someone like the Consumers Union could possibly start a class action for this against all of these clowns for all the stress, financial worries, and the extortion racket they gave people in both Quebec and Ontario.

Re: Voltage Versus Teksavvy, Round 2 Continued

Tue, 12 Mar 2013 13:11:30 EDT

anon posted : No C&D letter means that trolling dickwads are not interested in stopping so called "piracy". They are interested purely in extortion. If courts are going to allow it it is going to be a proof that democracy is BS and the only law is the law of money and corporations.

Re: Voltage Versus Teksavvy, Round 2 Continued

Tue, 12 Mar 2013 12:16:15 EDT

anon posted :

said by resa1983:

Canipre Admits It's Behind Voltage-TekSavvy File Sharing Lawsuits With Speculative Invoicing Scheme

»www.michaelgeist.ca/content/view/6805/125/

Really should read this.

Now we get to see if the courts (ie Canada) will allow this to go on. If it does, I'm quitting the chemistry field to troll and sue people on p2p-networks. More money. Easier life w/o the need to think.

Re: Voltage Versus Teksavvy, Round 2 Continued

Tue, 12 Mar 2013 11:43:52 EDT

mazhurg posted :

said by cog_biz_user:

e]
If Canipre has access to "first version uploads", then they should be shutting it down at the source (the rippers and uploaders), instead of suing all the little guys at the bottom (the downloaders). What a bunch of dicks.

But but, how would they make extra money from the rich subscribers stealing all their B movies and content?

They are not dicks, just savvy trollers. :uhh:

Re: Voltage Versus Teksavvy, Round 2 Continued

Tue, 12 Mar 2013 11:23:28 EDT

cog_biz_user posted :

“We’ve penetrated a number of underground groups and invite-only FTPs,” Logan says. “That’s typically where we see a lot of the first-version uploads transacting.” While Canipre’s film-noir website paints the company as the scourge of pirates, the truth is murkier. Logan says adversarial relationships with pirate site operators are generally counterproductive; working amicably to get illegal content removed produces better results. Canipre could seek to shut down illegal sites, but doesn’t. “It’s best to know where your enemies are and what they’re doing,” he says. “The intelligence value far exceeds the enforcement value.”

If Canipre has access to "first version uploads", then they should be shutting it down at the source (the rippers and uploaders), instead of suing all the little guys at the bottom (the downloaders). What a bunch of dicks.
--
Myth: It's only fair to pay for quality first-run movies.
Fact: Most movies shown on cable get two stars or less
and are repeated ad nauseum.

Re: Voltage Versus Teksavvy, Round 2 Continued

Tue, 12 Mar 2013 10:47:17 EDT

bt posted :

said by resa1983:

Canipre Admits It's Behind Voltage-TekSavvy File Sharing Lawsuits With Speculative Invoicing Scheme

»www.michaelgeist.ca/content/view/6805/125/

Really should read this.

Did Canipre just seriously weaken Voltage's case? Am I reading that right?

Re: Voltage Versus Teksavvy, Round 2 Continued

Tue, 12 Mar 2013 09:55:34 EDT

resa1983 posted : Canipre Admits It's Behind Voltage-TekSavvy File Sharing Lawsuits With Speculative Invoicing Scheme

»www.michaelgeist.ca/content/view/6805/125/

Really should read this.
--
Battle.net Tech Support MVP

Re: Voltage Versus Teksavvy, Round 2 Continued

Mon, 11 Mar 2013 22:46:01 EDT

resa1983 posted : Full update from Ars:
»arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2013···to-hide/

Popehat will be posting on his own site, and cross-posting on techdirt, very soon.

EDIT: 8pm PDT - 11 EDT

The best writeup:
»www.popehat.com/2013/03/11/brett···he-star/

Way better than Ars'
--
Battle.net Tech Support MVP

Re: Voltage Versus Teksavvy, Round 2 Continued

Mon, 11 Mar 2013 19:23:44 EDT

andyb posted : Small update from Ars Tech »arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2013···lawyers/

Re: Voltage Versus Teksavvy, Round 2 Continued

Mon, 11 Mar 2013 19:14:26 EDT

sbrook posted : Gotta watch "without prejudice" because it does mean that the matter is not considered over. For example, if you offer to settle without prejudice, it only means that the offer to settle cannot be brought up as evidence in court, but it must contain a good faith offer of settlement.

What is necessary in this case is not only "without prejudice" but also terms to indicate that the offer of settlement is not an admission of guilt but a means to limit your costs in defending yourself.

Re: Voltage Versus Teksavvy, Round 2 Continued

Mon, 11 Mar 2013 19:06:49 EDT

shepd posted :

said by rednekcowboy:

Offering to settle, no matter how you word it would be an admission in the eyes of the court and if they refused your offer and took you to court, you would most likely be forced to pay something (might be $100, might be more).

You'd be better off saying you did nothing wrong and see you in court....

I wouldn't be so sure of that. Courts generally respect a defendant that doesn't want to waste their time by going to court when they could have settled and in as much, want to encourage them to do that by *not* using offers of settlement as evidence against the defendant (otherwise lawyers would never even offer to settle, as it would be a waste of their time, since nobody would as they'd then get sued anyways). Be sure you offer the settlement "without prejudice".

»en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prejudice_···tiations

"The term 'without prejudice' is used in the course of negotiations to settle a lawsuit. It indicates that a particular conversation or letter cannot be tendered as evidence in court. It can be considered a form of privilege. This usage flows from the primary meaning: concessions and representations made for purpose of settlement are simply being mooted for that purpose, and are not meant to actually concede those points in litigation."

Of course, this is why I say *I* would represent myself. Unfortunately, most people stare into a court room like it's some kind of mysterious black box and make the wrong choices.

Re: Voltage Versus Teksavvy, Round 2 Continued

Mon, 11 Mar 2013 18:19:02 EDT

resa1983 posted : Prenda updates:

Alan Mooney denies being CEO, etc of AF Holdings or any other company Prenda represents:
»www.techdirt.com/articles/201303···es.shtml

Filed today:
Verizon stating Gibbs didn't inform them that the subpoenas had been null & voided, which was why the information was sent to Prenda. This matters, cuz Gibbs put in an affidavit under penalty of perjury that he served the order voiding the prior subpoena on Verizon, which he apparently didn't.
short:
»ia701508.us.archive.org/28/items···77.0.pdf
long:
»ia701508.us.archive.org/28/items···78.0.pdf

Tweets from recess during hearing - hearing started 1:30pm PDT (4:30pm EDT), recessed after 1 1/2 hrs, and went back in minutes later:

»twitter.com/goodreverend

quote:
In recess. Just. Wow.

Steele and friends didn't show, but they're available by phone. Alan Cooper -- the real one -- is here. #Prendalaw

Wright came in like a tornado. Things do not look good for Prenda. At all. #Prendalaw

Judge Wright just take up the Janice to call Steele and company. Pity they aren't here to know the prior testimony. Poor move. #Prendalaw

Pietz is handling this masterfully. Gibbs lawyers tried to discredit Verizon declaration. Gibbs introduces Verizon lawyer. #Prendalaw

Gibbs lawyers awfully quiet. Wright blasted the Hensmeier deposition. Said he doesn't know anything about his own firm. #Prendalaw

I have lots of updates from #prenda. But going back in now. Needed to refill popcorn. Oh god the popcorn is endless.

Guess we'll hear more when its done.
--
Battle.net Tech Support MVP

Re: Voltage Versus Teksavvy, Round 2 Continued

Mon, 11 Mar 2013 15:38:41 EDT

anon posted :

said by andyb:

Live tweet feed of the Prenda hearing thats starts in about 50 minutes
»fightcopyrighttrolls.com/2013/03···ve-feed/

TY.
And Prenda filed in court that it wants your IP address if you go to that domain to read anything. Even funnier.

Re: Voltage Versus Teksavvy, Round 2 Continued

Mon, 11 Mar 2013 14:52:16 EDT

andyb posted : Live tweet feed of the Prenda hearing thats starts in about 50 minutes
»fightcopyrighttrolls.com/2013/03···ve-feed/

Re: Voltage Versus Teksavvy, Round 2 Continued

Sat, 09 Mar 2013 16:59:33 EDT

anon posted :

said by humanfilth:

But while the blood of trolls may indeed flow on Monday, in the last few days Prenda have been going on the offensive. .........

Monday is going to be a fun read when they don't show up in court like they were told to do. If the judge does nothing.... it will be a slap in the face to the ordinary people of the states. Court orders for them and court orders ignored for others.

Re: Voltage Versus Teksavvy, Round 2 Continued

Sat, 09 Mar 2013 15:30:06 EDT

humanfilth posted : These copyright maffia firms are so desperate to kick down their clients customers.
Like why the hell do they do the old ancient times way of stomping everyone in their path...

An IP address is not a person and since the firm is abusing the court system by avoiding the police and their investigative branch at all costs. You end up with many innocent victims wondering why they have to spend money to declare their innocence.

The Charter of Rights in Canada states that you are innocent until proved of guilt.

But we always need to point out that accusing someone of guilt and interrogating someone accused of guilt and then slamming their limp body through the court system based on an accusation of guilt is just wrong.
If there is not enough basic evidence on the spot, of guilt, then you walk away. Accusing someone walking their dog of their dog crapping in the yard based on the size of the turd is wrong. Covering the dog poop in bacon grease helps to remove the poop and educates the dog walker.

People have been so brainwashed that they think that the police can just stop you in your travels and interrogate you under some false pretenses of the crime of the day/night.
Did you commit a crime? Where you in the planning stages of committing a crime? If not, then you can not be stopped, searched and interrogated. That is the common basics of law.
It is illegal for those TSA security guards to molest/digital strip you, but the police will ignore those daily crimes, which creates a long string of crimes in the name of derp.

Meanwhile corporations now write the laws in order to allow for their criminal activity, while the peasants do not realize that all laws are to apply equally to all occupants of the country at all times.
That goes for politicians too. Violate the Charter with a bogus law and we really would love to see the politician who created it to go to prison for life, but he claims immunity from being prosecuted and the police/prosecutor and court system refuse to do anything about enforcing the law equally. Rob a bank and go to jail, but a bank executive can rob the customers and get a $10 million bonus as congratulations.

The powers that be hate it when people state the justifiable law to them. But without enough people stating the law, those that then state the law, may be assaulted, bankrupted or killed in the name of 'shut your damn mouth'.

*^*

»torrentfreak.com/copyright-troll···-130308/

.......... In the United States some of the most motivated troll fighters are to be found on two sites, FightCopyrightTrolls and DieTrollDie. Their aims are simple. To keep the public and fellow victims informed and to ensure that through activism, trolls make as little money as possible.

Needless to say, trolls do not like this kind of opposition. It hurts their bottom line. And now, in the middle of what is probably the most bizarre case there has ever been in troll history, one outfit is coming out fighting possibly for its life.

Prenda Law is in the middle of a mess so massive that to adequately describe the case in enough detail one needs to write many thousands of words. Fortunately, for those who want to catch up, the sites mentioned above have been keeping up to date, complimented brilliantly by Techdirt Mike Masnick and Kens excellent summary over at Popehat.

The TL;DR is that there is going to be an unprecedented showdown in a Los Angeles court on Monday that could lead to someone associated with Prenda going to prison.

“Based on the evidence presented at the March 11, 2013 hearing, the Court will consider whether sanctions [for Prenda Law] are appropriate, and if so, determine the proper punishment. This may include a monetary fine, incarceration, or other sanctions sufficient to deter future misconduct,” Judge Wright explained.

But while the blood of trolls may indeed flow on Monday, in the last few days Prenda have been going on the offensive. .........

Occupy everything

Re: Voltage Versus Teksavvy, Round 2 Continued

Sat, 09 Mar 2013 15:26:14 EDT

anon posted :

said by resa1983:

said by Shrug :

Maybe they will sue everyone here at DSLr for defamation!

Woot!

Lol.. Saw that thing on Prenda huh?

You betcha.

Been keeping tabs on this one ;) The whole thing is a fricking circus. Monday is going to be SoOoOo gOoOoOoD if they don't show their faces, as they wrote they wouldn't (more or less telling the judge to stick it).

Re: Voltage Versus Teksavvy, Round 2 Continued

Sat, 09 Mar 2013 14:34:59 EDT

resa1983 posted :

said by Shrug :

Maybe they will sue everyone here at DSLr for defamation!

Woot!

Lol.. Saw that thing on Prenda huh?

It's kinda funny too... As I sent CIPPIC to fightcopyrighttrolls.com for background info on Voltage in the US.. When it came out that Prenda wanted IPs for every visitor of that site & dtd, I said I didn't think CIPPIC would like that too much, which they RT'd.

I will be quite surprised if Voltage continues this case much further tbh.
--
Battle.net Tech Support MVP

Re: Voltage Versus Teksavvy, Round 2 Continued

Sat, 09 Mar 2013 13:10:46 EDT

anon posted : Maybe they will sue everyone here at DSLr for defamation!

Woot!

Re: Voltage Versus Teksavvy, Round 2 Continued

Sat, 09 Mar 2013 12:17:42 EDT

rednekcowboy posted :

said by TypeS:

Court cases like these are often long drawn out affairs, with actual court dates far apart from each other. Seeing now news for weeks, or even months is not a sign any side has backed off.

You are correct for the most part, however not sending out the C&D while claiming to the courts that it was an absolute emergency and that it was imperative that Tek's alleged infringers received it immediately, may very well be a sign....

Re: Voltage Versus Teksavvy, Round 2 Continued

Sat, 09 Mar 2013 12:14:12 EDT

TypeS posted : Court cases like these are often long drawn out affairs, with actual court dates far apart from each other. Seeing now news for weeks, or even months is not a sign any side has backed off.