<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Topic &#x27;New speeds in KCMO&#x27; in forum &#x27;Time Warner Internet Services&#x27; - dslreports.com</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/New-speeds-in-KCMO-27897511</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 23:56:15 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 23:56:15 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: New speeds in KCMO</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-New-speeds-in-KCMO-27972418</link>
<description><![CDATA[onthecake posted : From my experience with them once we went to DOCSIS 3 (which I believe the top 2 tiers use) I have not had any slowdowns at the heavy use hours. ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-New-speeds-in-KCMO-27972418</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 02 Feb 2013 13:23:29 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: New speeds in KCMO</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-New-speeds-in-KCMO-27934561</link>
<description><![CDATA[anon posted : I can tell you near Gladstone we average 15mbps down 5 up. Tonight? 1 down 1 up. Turbo tier! Varies widely here in 64068 area code (pleasant valley) but almost never get the advertised speeds. Stumbled on this thread trying to find out if there was an outage in my area. Apparently this is upgraded service? Great.... ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-New-speeds-in-KCMO-27934561</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2013 22:46:42 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: New speeds in KCMO</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-New-speeds-in-KCMO-27928673</link>
<description><![CDATA[thorin posted : <div class="bquote"><said>said by <a href="/profile/1823701" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1823701');">nephipower</a>:</said><p>What does the Pass part of the "Turbo Pass" tier mean? Is this a new tier now in KC?<br> </p></div>Turbo Pass is the old turbo tier.  They decided to keep the old turbo and up the speed.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-New-speeds-in-KCMO-27928673</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jan 2013 21:21:38 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: New speeds in KCMO</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-New-speeds-in-KCMO-27927415</link>
<description><![CDATA[nephipower posted : What does the Pass part of the "Turbo Pass" tier mean? Is this a new tier now in KC?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-New-speeds-in-KCMO-27927415</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jan 2013 11:23:41 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: New speeds in KCMO</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-New-speeds-in-KCMO-27927061</link>
<description><![CDATA[thorin posted : It's the whole KC division. All speeds were bumped. They are the following<br><br>Lite - 5 down 1 up<br>Basic - 10 down 1 up<br>Standard - 15 down 1 up<br>Turbo Pass - 20 down 2 up<br>Turbo - 30 down 5 up<br>Extreme - 50 down 5 up<br>Ultimate - 100 down 5 up<br><br>Hope that helps. Haven't heard anything about upload changes, some of the hubs aren't upstream bonding yet. ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-New-speeds-in-KCMO-27927061</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jan 2013 08:01:27 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: New speeds in KCMO</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-New-speeds-in-KCMO-27926906</link>
<description><![CDATA[areoh posted : How wide-spread is this the KC area?  We're moving to Galdstone and will probably order service, but it's not clear what's available (LVL 1 sales reps don't seem to have any info.) ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-New-speeds-in-KCMO-27926906</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jan 2013 02:27:50 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: New speeds in KCMO</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-New-speeds-in-KCMO-27912160</link>
<description><![CDATA[fatal posted : no love for nyc :( ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-New-speeds-in-KCMO-27912160</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2013 22:14:28 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: New speeds in KCMO</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-New-speeds-in-KCMO-27911721</link>
<description><![CDATA[sticks435 posted : <div class="bquote"><said>said by <a href="/profile/1601746" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1601746');">motorola870</a>:</said><p><div class="bquote"><said>said by <a href="/profile/1764001" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1764001');">mdpeterman</a>:</said><p>Really TWC? 105/5? That's the most ridiculous thing I've seen. Every other ISP offering 100+Mbps offers at least 10, some 20mbps. What cost is there for TWC to offer faster upload speeds? If I need to upload a 5GB file, I'm going to upload it if it takes 2 hours or 4. I'm going to use the bandwidth so just provide a reasonable upload speed. <br> </p></div>not true and it is 100/5 not 105/5 the 101Mbps download includes the padding overhead that TWC provides on extreme and ultimate. Also suddenlink offers 107/5 in some markets so not all companies offer more than 10Mbps on the upload with 100Mbps. Also Charter doesn't offer more than 5Mbps on the upload for their 100Mbps product either.<br><br>There is no cost to offer faster upload speeds for TWC up the upload speed just need a clean return path and upstream bonding enabled. Although I wonder what is the acceptable max the system can handle due to how TWC provisions their CMTS with the mix of QAM64 and QAM16 upstreams as some areas have 4 upstreams while others only have 2 or 3. My areas is already upstream bonding and has 6 downstream QAMs for internet. <br> </p></div>I think TWC is in the processing of bonding everyone to 4 upstream channels, just haven't gotten them all done yet. I think once that is done, the rumor is that it will be 100/25 and 50/10, but may end up just being 100/10 and 50/10. Hopefully we'll see soon :D]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-New-speeds-in-KCMO-27911721</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2013 19:39:59 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: New speeds in KCMO</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-New-speeds-in-KCMO-27902239</link>
<description><![CDATA[motorola870 posted : <div class="bquote"><said>said by <a href="/profile/1764001" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1764001');">mdpeterman</a>:</said><p>Really TWC? 105/5? That's the most ridiculous thing I've seen. Every other ISP offering 100+Mbps offers at least 10, some 20mbps. What cost is there for TWC to offer faster upload speeds? If I need to upload a 5GB file, I'm going to upload it if it takes 2 hours or 4. I'm going to use the bandwidth so just provide a reasonable upload speed. <br> </p></div>not true and it is 100/5 not 105/5 the 101Mbps download includes the padding overhead that TWC provides on extreme and ultimate. Also suddenlink offers 107/5 in some markets so not all companies offer more than 10Mbps on the upload with 100Mbps. Also Charter doesn't offer more than 5Mbps on the upload for their 100Mbps product either.<br><br>There is no cost to offer faster upload speeds for TWC up the upload speed just need a clean return path and upstream bonding enabled. Although I wonder what is the acceptable max the system can handle due to how TWC provisions their CMTS with the mix of QAM64 and QAM16 upstreams as some areas have 4 upstreams while others only have 2 or 3. My areas is already upstream bonding and has 6 downstream QAMs for internet. ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-New-speeds-in-KCMO-27902239</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2013 12:38:08 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: New speeds in KCMO</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-New-speeds-in-KCMO-27901840</link>
<description><![CDATA[mdpeterman posted : Really TWC? 105/5? That's the most ridiculous thing I've seen. Every other ISP offering 100+Mbps offers at least 10, some 20mbps. What cost is there for TWC to offer faster upload speeds? If I need to upload a 5GB file, I'm going to upload it if it takes 2 hours or 4. I'm going to use the bandwidth so just provide a reasonable upload speed. ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-New-speeds-in-KCMO-27901840</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2013 11:05:34 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: New speeds in KCMO</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-New-speeds-in-KCMO-27901129</link>
<description><![CDATA[Elyria posted : <div class="bquote"><said>said by <a href="/profile/1612680" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1612680');">patt2k</a>:</said><p>Pretty sure you are running kasperksy antivirus or something like that when I was with TWC the program would cause it for speedtests to show different thing.<br> </p></div>What relevence does this question have with the results of the OP.<br>Wildest dreams can make not one connection]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-New-speeds-in-KCMO-27901129</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2013 03:19:19 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: New speeds in KCMO</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-New-speeds-in-KCMO-27901123</link>
<description><![CDATA[kilrathi posted : I believe it but in future try to link the image and link from speedtest.net as you can always click forum link and url for every test on speedtest.net instead of uploading the picture here on board, then it makes it more reliable.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-New-speeds-in-KCMO-27901123</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2013 03:03:38 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: New speeds in KCMO</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-New-speeds-in-KCMO-27901017</link>
<description><![CDATA[davidhoffman posted : 100/5?  One day I expect to see 200/5. Using the future 24 channel bonding, 900/9.  Upstream gets no respect.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-New-speeds-in-KCMO-27901017</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2013 01:00:58 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: New speeds in KCMO</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-New-speeds-in-KCMO-27899917</link>
<description><![CDATA[motorola870 posted : <div class="bquote"><said>said by <a href="/profile/162762" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=162762');">djrobx</a>:</said><p><div class="bquote"><said>said by <a href="/profile/1601746" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1601746');">motorola870</a>:</said><p>Kansas City is a test market for Google Fiber. Because Time Warner is feeling some competitive pressure, they're upgrading to 100/5 ultimate and 50/5 extreme.<br> </p></div>Fixed that for you. :) <br> </p></div>well TWC hinted at expanding the 100/5 ultimate and 50/5 extreme to other markets and I have a feeling it will be markets with Fios and At&t uverse (mainly markets with Uverse that have Fios in parts as well such as the Dallas (North Texas) market which is split between verizon and at&t and the TWC system is a large cluster that runs on the same frequency plan except for the small patch that is 750MHz in an outer county that has DOCSIS 3.0 competition from the local power coop that has an HFC Fiber network that is offering 30/2 and 50/2 plans for their top tiers .  ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-New-speeds-in-KCMO-27899917</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2013 17:27:53 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: New speeds in KCMO</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-New-speeds-in-KCMO-27899749</link>
<description><![CDATA[djrobx posted : <div class="bquote"><said>said by <a href="/profile/1601746" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1601746');">motorola870</a>:</said><p>Kansas City is a test market for Google Fiber. Because Time Warner is feeling some competitive pressure, they're upgrading to 100/5 ultimate and 50/5 extreme.<br> </p></div>Fixed that for you. :) <br><small>--<br><b>AT&T U-Hearse</b> - RIP Unlimited Internet 1995-2011<br>Rethink Billable.<br></small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-New-speeds-in-KCMO-27899749</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2013 16:40:09 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: New speeds in KCMO</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-New-speeds-in-KCMO-27899724</link>
<description><![CDATA[patt2k posted : oh I gotchu :D]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-New-speeds-in-KCMO-27899724</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2013 16:35:00 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: New speeds in KCMO</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-New-speeds-in-KCMO-27899620</link>
<description><![CDATA[motorola870 posted : <div class="bquote"><said>said by <a href="/profile/1612680" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1612680');">patt2k</a>:</said><p>Pretty sure you are running kasperksy antivirus or something like that when I was with TWC the program would cause it for speedtests to show different thing.<br> </p></div>Kansas City is a test market for 100/5 ultimate and 50/5 extreme.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-New-speeds-in-KCMO-27899620</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2013 16:03:40 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: New speeds in KCMO</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-New-speeds-in-KCMO-27899574</link>
<description><![CDATA[onthecake posted : <div class="bquote"><said>said by <a href="/profile/1612680" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1612680');">patt2k</a>:</said><p>Pretty sure you are running kasperksy antivirus or something like that when I was with TWC the program would cause it for speedtests to show different thing.<br> </p></div>Thats a negative]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-New-speeds-in-KCMO-27899574</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2013 15:50:38 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: New speeds in KCMO</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-New-speeds-in-KCMO-27899460</link>
<description><![CDATA[patt2k posted : Pretty sure you are running kasperksy antivirus or something like that when I was with TWC the program would cause it for speedtests to show different thing.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-New-speeds-in-KCMO-27899460</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2013 15:19:40 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: New speeds in KCMO</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-New-speeds-in-KCMO-27898744</link>
<description><![CDATA[nephipower posted : wow, nice. Would you mind showing a screenshot of your modem's signal stats?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-New-speeds-in-KCMO-27898744</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2013 12:12:08 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>New speeds in KCMO</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/New-speeds-in-KCMO-27897511</link>
<description><![CDATA[onthecake posted : This may have already been posted but I didnt see anything...<br><br>After noticing downloads run much faster than I am used to I tested my wideband or whatever they call it now and am getting 100 mbps.<br><br>I will take it.<br><br><a rel=nofollow HREF="http://www.speedtest.net" > [att=1] </A><br><br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://stopthecap.com/2012/12/20/more-speed-increases-from-time-warner-cable-100mbps-coming-to-kansas-city/" >stopthecap.com/2012/12/20/more-s&middot;&middot;&middot;as-city/</A><br><br>UPDATED: Including URL for speedtest as requested.<br>&raquo;<a rel=nofollow HREF="http://www.speedtest.net/result/2425716753.png" >www.speedtest.net/result/2425716753.png</A><div class="borderless"><TABLE WIDTH=95% align=center border=0 CELLPADDING=4"><TR><TD ALIGN=CENTER VALIGN=CENTER BGCOLOR=#FFFFFF nwrap COLSPAN=2 WIDTH=66%><A HREF="/speak/slideshow/27897511?c=2065659&ret=L2ZvcnVtL3IyNzg5NzUxMS54bWw%3D"><IMG TITLE="33117 bytes" BORDER=0 WIDTH=300 HEIGHT=135 SRC="/r0/download/2065659~57050ba7a005322ec9dc613c67a64afa/7645_116"></A></TD></TABLE></div>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/New-speeds-in-KCMO-27897511</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2013 00:07:40 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
