 | Packetloss on Cox's network - 68.1.4.139 I'm seeing a lot of packetloss on this router on Cox's network. A significant amount of websites for me are routed through this hop. So seeing lots of timeouts and drops in download speed when ever a website jumps through that route.
I'm seeing 50-75% packetloss just on that hop: 68.1.4.139 IP Lookup showed that IP range is on Cox's network: Cox Communications Inc. NETBLK-AT-INT-68-1-0-0 (NET-68-1-0-0-1) 68.1.0.0 - 68.1.127.255
Traceroute example

|
|
 | Hello Shadowdane,
I'm having a similar problem in Arizona with a similar server, also my fifth hop to pretty much anywhere, with the IP 68.1.1.19. Same PingPlotter results. Have you tried pinging that IP directly in the Windows cmd ? When I do this with my questionable hop, the pings look normal. However, when I try to run a trace route to anywhere with Windows or PingPlotter, I get a lot of time-outs at this address.
For me, it seems that even if my Internet speeds are perfectly fine and stable, this hop will still show 40-50 % packet loss consistently on PingPlotter. It's to the point where I was wondering if it was an issue with PingPlotter and not the server itself, but I find it fascinating that you are posting about essentially the same observation. |
|
 | reply to Shadowdane Being that there is no loss before or after that hop it's very likely that router deprioritizes ICMP packets. Basically, it only responds to a set number in a given time frame. Once that number is reached it discards the rest. Hope this helps. |
|
 CoxTech1VIP join:2002-04-25 Chesapeake, VA kudos:73 | reply to Shadowdane Iceman0803's right, 68.1.4.139 can't be dropping packets if you're able to get to 70.167.150.18 and beyond without loss. |
|
 | said by CoxTech1:Iceman0803's right, 68.1.4.139 can't be dropping packets if you're able to get to 70.167.150.18 and beyond without loss. My knowledge is thanks to you Sir!  |
|
 | reply to Shadowdane ok I've figured out a bit more specifically when I'm getting packetloss... it seems when ever I'm downloading or uploading over maybe ~4-6Mbps sustained throughput. I start getting packetloss, once the bandwidth usage goes back to 0 the packetloss stops.
Like tonight for example I fired up Netflix on my Xbox 360 and started streaming a HD show which is about 4-5Mbps stream. I jumped on my computer and did a pinged youtube.com for example.

I only started having this problem when I upgraded to a SB6141 modem and the 100/20 package. I had no such issue with my SB6120 and the 30/3.5 package I had previously.
Signal levels look fine I think:  |
|
 CoxTech1VIP join:2002-04-25 Chesapeake, VA kudos:73 | This data makes a little more sense now. The trace route you posted this time indicates loss between the PC you tested from and our CMTS. Can you try without the router and see if it's possible to duplicate these results? |
|
 | reply to Shadowdane What firmware are you running on the SB6141? I had similar problems until the firmware was automatically upgraded by Cox to SB_KOMODO-1.0.6.8-SCM01-NOSH. |
|
 odogCable Centric Vendor BiasedPremium,VIP join:2001-08-05 Atlanta, GA kudos:9 Reviews:
·Comcast
| reply to Shadowdane said by Shadowdane:ok I've figured out a bit more specifically when I'm getting packetloss... it seems when ever I'm downloading or uploading over maybe ~4-6Mbps sustained throughput. I start getting packetloss, once the bandwidth usage goes back to 0 the packetloss stops. Sounds like QOS on the router is kicking in. |
|
|
|
 Manse join:2013-01-25 Warner Robins, GA | reply to CoxTech1 said by CoxTech1:This data makes a little more sense now. The trace route you posted this time indicates loss between the PC you tested from and our CMTS. Can you try without the router and see if it's possible to duplicate these results? I am having similar problems when I route through either 68.1.4.139 or 68.1.4.133. I was supposed to have a tech come out Wednesday, but I received a call saying that the problem was fixed on Cox's end. I was still having terrible problems, on an unloaded line, last night after the fix.
I will upload pingplotter outputs when I get home tonight. |
|
 Manse join:2013-01-25 Warner Robins, GA | As mentioned |
|
 CoxTech1VIP join:2002-04-25 Chesapeake, VA kudos:73 | The loss in your case appears to be mostly random. Can you try without the router and post the results? |
|
 Manse join:2013-01-25 Warner Robins, GA | Apologies for the delay, been a long weekend.
Unless I'm missing something, it's not random. it's at one of two servers, depending on whether I ping google or something else.
Tonight's scan during a LoL game, in which I was reporting 225-250 ping in game. "normal" ping during the day is under 100 and when I'm having these packet problems it's usually around 180-200.
Feel in the game was marginally worse without the router.
Thoughts? |
|
 CoxTech1VIP join:2002-04-25 Chesapeake, VA kudos:73 | This second trace route without the router looks much better. 68.1.4.133 is showing ICMP deprioritization but no issues unlike the previous results you posted. |
|
 Manse join:2013-01-25 Warner Robins, GA 1 edit | So how do I fix the deprioritization? Is that the cause of my latency/stutter?
I'm currently in game, sitting at over 200 ping. Hell, I'm an hour south of Atlanta and my ventrilo (tungsten.typefrag: in ATL) is pinging at 150+ ms. |
|
 KennyD join:2005-03-08 Norfolk, VA | ICMP deprioritization is nothing to worry about. It isn't going to negatively affect your connection. As mentioned earlier, all that's happening is the router only replies to a certain number of pings within a given time frame. After that it just ignores the ICMP packets (ping) and that's why you see packet loss at 68.1.4.133 in Ping Plotter. This router isn't ignoring regular packets so that's why you don't see packet loss after that hop [68.1.4.133].
Hope that makes sense. Now as far as latency/stutter that is definitely a problem.. but it's not caused by 68.1.4.133 doing ICMP deprioritization. |
|
 CoxTech1VIP join:2002-04-25 Chesapeake, VA kudos:73 | reply to Manse As KennyD mentioned ICMP deprioritization is a non-issue and won't cause any problems with your connection. Comparing your pingplotter results with and without the router leads me to believe the router may be a contributing factor with regards to the issues you're experiencing. |
|
 Manse join:2013-01-25 Warner Robins, GA | I'll snag a new router tomorrow, but I still had the same issue in game.
Perhaps it's on LoL's end, but noone I play with has the same problem
updates with new router tomorrow. |
|
 Manse join:2013-01-25 Warner Robins, GA | For reference, I found one of the server IPs from another thread. Ping Plotter (with router).
I'd like to get without the router, but SWMBO is using the tubes as well. |
|
 CoxTech1VIP join:2002-04-25 Chesapeake, VA kudos:73 | Your other ping plotters also looked better without the router so I would try this test again without it to compare the results. |
|