said by zinc:To be fair to TSI, all their legal agreements with us customers says that if there's a court order, then they will comply. They do not say that they will take extreme measures to protect our privacy. And to date, there hasn't been a court order so nobody has any of our information.
It's really up to the court, I haven't seen any of the details, but if Voltage's evidence is as shabby as it has been described, then the court shouldn't be ordering TSI to disclose customer information. It's not up to TSI to decide that Voltage's evidence is crap.
It's not up to the court to cross-examine Voltage's motion to disclose. It's not the court's duty to do this. It's the defendant's duty to cross-examine the motion. In fact, without opposition, the court has no choice but to grant the motion as is.
Upholding one's part of a privacy agreement by cross-examining a third party's motion to disclose is not extreme measures. It's an integral part of one's duty according to the conditions set forth by the agreement.
Furthermore, a motion to disclose is not a court order.
To be fair to TSI, of course.