<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Topic &#x27;Re: Firewall&#x27; in forum &#x27;&#x27; - dslreports.com</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Firewall-27903484</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 18:02:02 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 18:02:02 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: Firewall</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Firewall-27903735</link>
<description><![CDATA[Kearnstd posted : Likely only their primary news branches since those are seen by regulators as official information outlets.<br><br>Sites like CNET have been compromised by their sponsors and ownership for awhile now.<br><br>if you are a technology vendor and a huge sponsor of a site like CNET, you can bet management will never allow a totally burning review of your products.<br><small>--<br>[65 Arcanist]Filan(High Elf) Zone: Broadband Reports</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Firewall-27903735</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2013 18:53:20 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Firewall</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Firewall-27903484</link>
<description><![CDATA[Zoder posted : I thought the major networks have a firewall between their entertainment and news divisions for just this reason.  Or does this only apply to their network news and not their internet properties?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Firewall-27903484</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2013 17:28:01 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
