said by MaynardKrebs: said by Tx:
Sorry, i tried reading David's post, he over quotes. He may not normally write like that, but that post is as i said a mess. I enjoy a good read, don't get me wrong. Both sides of the fence but that blog wasn't a blog. It wasn't very different then quoting someone on here and answering it.
If you're dissatisfied with the efforts of others, perhaps you could write something which clearly
articulates the position of each party to this saga - from day 1 through to the present, including citations of the relevant laws and their interpretations through your own lens, and critique those whom in your opinion have failed miserably, failed moderately, done neither good not evil, or perhaps have the clearest understanding of the correct way forward in this matter. Please elucidate on your efforts to bring superior litigators to the table, including minutes of the calls you made and the discussions therein. I smell "Pulitzer" in this for you.
If, on the other hand, if you're just blowing Bronx cheers from the cheap seats........ kindly let those who are actually paying for legal representation. at great expense, have their say in court before you ride to the rescue.
Wow dude, you seriously need to take a step back. I was commenting that i could not continue reading a blog and you go on like this?
Take a step back because your version of a allegorical quote from wiki was rather odd, to then this post over my thoughts on a blog.
Get over yourself. I at least remain objective to this ISP unlike others who feel like the love of their life is being attacked.
I commented on a blog and you blow smoke like i just shot Teksavvy's dog.