site Search:


 
    All Forums Hot Topics Gallery






how-to block ads


 
Search Topic:
Uniqs:
5585
Share Topic
Posting?
Post a:
Post a:
Links: ·TekSavvy DSL Reviews ·TekSavvy Forum FAQ ·Speedtest results
page: 1 · 2 · 3
AuthorAll Replies

JMJimmy

join:2008-07-23

Proud of TSI for it's actions in Jan 14th hearing

You stood up for our privacy.

Thank you Marc.

rdcanuck

join:2010-09-22
Nepean, ON

+1



TwiztedZero
Nine Zero Burp Nine Six
Premium
join:2011-03-31
Toronto, ON
kudos:3
Reviews:
·TekSavvy Cable

reply to JMJimmy
+1 Ditto!
--
----|- From the mind located in the shadows of infinity -|----
Nine.Zero.Burp.Nine.Six
Twitter = Twizted Zero
Chat = irc.teksavvy.ca


MFido

join:2012-10-19
kudos:1

reply to JMJimmy
as I am a fanboy .... +10


d_source

join:2011-01-18

reply to JMJimmy
Where can we find out what happened today? Is it still going on?


TheodicalCat

join:2012-12-26

This is the link for the tweets about the court hearing:

»[Twitter] Ressy | PAnderson| MGeist | SVILaw


JMJimmy

join:2008-07-23

reply to d_source

said by d_source:

Where can we find out what happened today? Is it still going on?

»[Twitter] Ressy | PAnderson| MGeist | SVILaw

Adjourned for today

Jaxom

join:2012-03-10
East York, ON

reply to JMJimmy
That is a lot of money Teksavvy has spent fighting these copyright trolls. Much thanks.

I am not one of the defendants but I still appreciate the fact that Teksavvy didn't just hand over our personal information.


d_source

join:2011-01-18

reply to JMJimmy
Found it: »www.techdirt.com/articles/201301···ge.shtml


kahhnn

join:2003-07-16
North York, ON

reply to JMJimmy
Way to go! You sure had a lot of folks worried TS but at the end of the day you certainly did go to bat to protect customers privacy.

Big thanks to folks like Jason K, TX and others for your decent posts on this forum, I found most of it very informative.

Cheers!


EHTL

join:2002-10-31
Canada

reply to JMJimmy
Thank you TSI.



AkFubar
Admittedly, A Teksavvy Fan

join:2005-02-28
Toronto CAN.
Reviews:
·TekSavvy DSL

reply to JMJimmy
WOOT TSI! A nice measured response to Voltage. Just enough pressure.

I do hope the court will allow you to recover costs in this fiasco tho.
--
If my online experience is enhanced, why are my speeds throttled?? BHell... A Public Futility.


morisato

join:2008-03-16
Oshawa, ON

They still did not oppose the motion all they did is buy more time for someone else to do what they should be doing... IE oppose the motion.
--
Every time Someone leaves Sympatico an Angel gets its wings.



AkFubar
Admittedly, A Teksavvy Fan

join:2005-02-28
Toronto CAN.

reply to JMJimmy
Well TSI counsel did demand assurances of privacy from Voltage.


morisato

join:2008-03-16
Oshawa, ON

True, they earned some points with me today but the lack of being willing to oppose the motion, Lost them alot of points p:)
--
Every time Someone leaves Sympatico an Angel gets its wings.


JMJimmy

join:2008-07-23

reply to morisato

said by morisato:

They still did not oppose the motion all they did is buy more time for someone else to do what they should be doing... IE oppose the motion.

As Ak said, they did request assurances of privacy. They also backed up CIPPIC, took issue with the affidavit from Barry Logan, but more than that they gave the court a major point to consider: Only ~50% of the IPs could be associated. That has huge legal significance because this is a civil case and the odds are important. If TSI was able to associate 75% or more the odds are heavily in Voltages favour - at 50% it makes it that much harder for Voltage to claim their information is accurate. Combine 50% with all the arguments against IP info that means they've got a serious uphill battle that they're probably not prepared to fight.


drjp81

join:2006-01-09
canada

reply to JMJimmy
The techdirt article seems to say as much as the battle is not going to be easy for Voltage and the judge seems to actually concerned with the issues. That is the most important.

--
Cheers!


MoreFaxes

join:2002-09-27
United

reply to JMJimmy
Why celebrating? I don't see it.

1. The lawsuit is not terminated. It is simply postponed.
2. TSI's log is inaccurate and incomplete, by their own admission. Any TSI customer can potentially be wrongfully accused. Weren't there 40 mistaken ID from the last count? So anyone is at risk, including the law abiding netizens that never ever used a P2P.

So why are we still celebrating again?



drjp81

join:2006-01-09
canada

said by MoreFaxes:

Why celebrating? I don't see it.

1. The lawsuit is not terminated. It is simply postponed.
2. TSI's log is inaccurate and incomplete, by their own admission. Any TSI customer can potentially be wrongfully accused. Weren't there 40 mistaken ID from the last count? So anyone is at risk, including the law abiding netizens that never ever used a P2P.

So why are we still celebrating again?

Because we made progress towards real justice. Which is what anyone wants.
--
Cheers!


d4m1r

join:2011-08-25
Reviews:
·Start Communicat..
·TekSavvy Cable
·Rogers Hi-Speed

reply to morisato

said by morisato:

They still did not oppose the motion all they did is buy more time for someone else to do what they should be doing... IE oppose the motion.

This....The only good news that I saw coming out of court today is that at least TSI is working with CIPPIC and advocating for them to intervene in the case.

Come to think of it, isn't that a little better actually? While I still wish TSI simply opposed the motion which would have stopped it dead in the water, at least an expert and pro-internet group such as CIPPIC is now involved in the case and in TSI's corner...
--
www.613websites.com ● Budget Canadian Web Design and Hosting
page: 1 · 2 · 3

Monday, 20-May 18:12:45 Terms of Use & Privacy | feedback | contact | Hosting by nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo
over 13.5 years online © 1999-2013 dslreports.com.
Most commented news this week
Hot Topics