|reply to MoreFaxes |
Re: Proud of TSI for it's actions in Jan 14th hearing
said by MoreFaxes:1) TSI openly supported CIPPIC to aid them in gaining intervener status
Why celebrating? I don't see it.
1. The lawsuit is not terminated. It is simply postponed.
2. TSI's log is inaccurate and incomplete, by their own admission. Any TSI customer can potentially be wrongfully accused. Weren't there 40 mistaken ID from the last count? So anyone is at risk, including the law abiding netizens that never ever used a P2P.
So why are we still celebrating again?
2) TSI didn't roll over. While they didn't officially oppose the motion, they opened up several legal avenues for CIPPIC, requested protections for our information in the event of disclosure, openly opposed Voltage's "evidence", and made it clear that it's going to be damn expensive for trolls to get subscriber info (while costs pre-disclosure was denied the door isn't shut on costs - if they are grated costs... $80-95/claim is a nice value to set on future attempts)