cog_biz_useri ruin threads apparently
join:2011-04-19
Hamilton, ON | reply to andyb
Re: Shaw sells Mountain Cablevision to Rogers I can understand why Shaw would want AWS space, but why a slice of tv tropolis? It's a terrible channel.  |
|
 DKSDamn Kidney StonesPremium,ExMod 2002
join:2001-03-22
Owen Sound, ON
kudos:2
 ·Bell Sympatico
| said by cog_biz_user:I can understand why Shaw would want AWS space, but why a slice of tv tropolis? It's a terrible channel.
Irrelevant. It is guaranteed revenue, as it is paid for by cable subscribers on a per user basis.
--
Need-based health care not greed-based health care. |
|
| said by DKS:said by cog_biz_user:I can understand why Shaw would want AWS space, but why a slice of tv tropolis? It's a terrible channel.
Irrelevant. It is guaranteed revenue, as it is paid for by cable subscribers on a per user basis. ....in a bundle.
The minute people can purchase channels a la carte, Shaw will have to writedown the value of TV Tropolis to effectively zero.
Shaw probably would have been smarter to sell the AWS spectrum to Wind, and then sell the cable assets separately to Rogers or Cogeco. |
|
resa1983Premium
join:2008-03-10
North York, ON
kudos:7 Reviews:
 ·TekSavvy Cable
| said by MaynardKrebs:said by DKS:said by cog_biz_user:I can understand why Shaw would want AWS space, but why a slice of tv tropolis? It's a terrible channel.
Irrelevant. It is guaranteed revenue, as it is paid for by cable subscribers on a per user basis. ....in a bundle. The minute people can purchase channels a la carte, Shaw will have to writedown the value of TV Tropolis to effectively zero. Shaw probably would have been smarter to sell the AWS spectrum to Wind, and then sell the cable assets separately to Rogers or Cogeco. Rogers probably would have made it a deal breaker, just to keep it out of Wind's hands.
--
Battle.net Tech Support MVP |
|
|
|
