 skeechanAi OtsukaholicPremium join:2012-01-26 AA169|170 kudos:2 | So much for the capacity crunch Given transit onto the wider internet is mere pennies, whether this data leaves AT&T's network is irrelevant.
Simply more evidence that their caps are unjustified horsecrap.
Either traffic is a problem or it isn't. Obviously it isn't. |
|
 brad join:2007-09-06 Etobicoke, ON | said by skeechan:Given transit onto the wider internet is mere pennies, whether this data leaves AT&T's network is irrelevant.
Simply more evidence that their caps are unjustified horsecrap.
Either traffic is a problem or it isn't. Obviously it isn't. There never has been justification for the caps.
Traffic transferred has never been an issue. It's the amount of bandwidth provisioned within the network. Caps are about a mind set of getting users to not use their Internet connection and a means of extorting more revenue from customers from something there isn't a shortage of. So that they can be lazy and not provide you a proper Internet connection and not upgrade their infrastructure. They want to sell faster and faster connections they cannot provide service for properly. |
|
|
|