<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Topic &#x27;Article should be corrected?&#x27; in forum &#x27;&#x27; - dslreports.com</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Article-should-be-corrected-27918975</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 11:56:51 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 11:56:51 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Article should be corrected?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Article-should-be-corrected-27918975</link>
<description><![CDATA[rabeatz posted : It seems to be written in a way that would make an existing turbo/lightning user believe that they'd see a speed increase without any price change.. when it seems that the Bhouse forum tech has confirmed that if an existing lightning user wants to see 60mbps they have to pony up the extra $5 / month.<br><br>Seems that some clarification should be added to explain that existing lightning users won't see a speed increase or price increase, unless they ask for it..]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Article-should-be-corrected-27918975</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2013 19:48:43 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
