 ivman join:2010-08-15 Shortsville, NY | reply to Chicago
Re: Post your 2013 speed test results WiMAX RSSI: -71 dBm WiMAX CINR: 26 dB 5.3 miles from tower 3:58 pm local time Series M modem. Netgear Wireless n300 Router.
The leaves are coming back out on the trees and my speeds are dropping.   |
|
 SkipdawgThe OriginalPremium,ExMod 2001-03 join:2001-04-19 Mount Vernon, WA | reply to Chicago
Sitting here waiting on a phone call so decided to screw off a bit. Ran speed test on my 3 browsers to see who would preform best. Yes it can change by the second with even one browser but hay why not.
IE 10
Firefox 21
Chrome 28 |
|
 xrayman join:2008-12-09 Kansas City kudos:1 | reply to Chicago
PXU1900 in CradlePoint MBR-1000 WiMAX RSSI: -75 dBm WiMAX CINR: 20 dB 5.5 miles from tower External grid antenna Test at 8:46am local time. 57°F, Overcast, Wind NW 7 mph
 |
|
 | »www.speedtest.net/result/2765743281.png
Why are my results so horrible??? I have a Series M. I have never gotten good results with Clear here in KC at either residence ... |
|
 ivman join:2010-08-15 Shortsville, NY | reply to Chicago
WiMAX RSSI: -71 dBm WiMAX CINR: 24 dB 5.3 miles from tower 11:19 pm local time Series M modem. Netgear Wireless n300 Router.  |
|
 xrayman join:2008-12-09 Kansas City kudos:1 | reply to Chicago
PXU1900 in CradlePoint MBR-1000 WiMAX RSSI: -75 dBm WiMAX CINR: 21 dB 5.5 miles from tower External grid antenna Test at 11:16pm local time. 67°F, Fair, Wind Calm
 |
|
|
|
 xrayman join:2008-12-09 Kansas City kudos:1 | reply to Chicago
PXU1900 in CradlePoint MBR-1000 WiMAX RSSI: -75 dBm WiMAX CINR: 21 dB 5.5 miles from tower External grid antenna Test at 7:55am local time. 63°F, Clear, Wind SE 6 mph
|
|
 xrayman join:2008-12-09 Kansas City kudos:1 | reply to Chicago
Can't connect to my longtime Base Station ID. This is the only connection I can get now.
PXU1900 in CradlePoint MBR-1000 WiMAX RSSI: -65 dBm WiMAX CINR: 13 dB 5.5 miles from tower External grid antenna Test at 12:40pm local time. 83°F, Clear, Wind SE 13 mph
 |
|
 ivman join:2010-08-15 Shortsville, NY | reply to Chicago
WiMAX RSSI: -70 dBm WiMAX CINR: 25 dB 5.3 miles from tower 09:10 pm local time Series M modem. Netgear Wireless n300 Router.  |
|
 MOSFET join:2002-09-29 Garfield, NJ Reviews:
·Optimum Online
| reply to Chicago

RSSI:-70, CINR:25 |
|
 MOSFET join:2002-09-29 Garfield, NJ | Different server, through MegaPath.
DOWNLOAD SPEED
10.03Mbps UPLOAD SPEED
0.94Mbps PACKET LOSS
0% LATENCY
88ms JITTER
18ms |
|
 criggs join:2000-07-14 New York, NY Reviews:
·Millenicom
| reply to Chicago
My WiMax is quite healthy today:

On my Tri-Fi I'm getting five bars out of six, 80% signal strength, -51 dBm and a CINR of +13.
My LTE on the other hand, while it has significant signal strength, six out of six bars, 100% signal strength, -79 dBm and a CINR of -10, is giving me very poor speeds at the moment:

I am in midtown Manhattan, New York, zip 10022. |
|
 | reply to Chicago
I'm only paying for 1.5Mb/s downstream and 0.5Mb/s upstream, so take that into account when you look at this:

According to this, my upstream is 90% of what it's supposed to be (which is probably within measurement error) and my downstream, at least right now, is about 50% higher than what I'm paying for. Not bad at all.
Of course gaming is problematic because of highly variable latency and about 0.05% packet loss, but nobody's perfect. |
|
 criggs join:2000-07-14 New York, NY Reviews:
·Millenicom
| reply to Chicago
My LTE seems to be slowly moving toward spec.
I am in midtown Manhattan, zip 10022. Before two days ago, LTE was not even showing up in my area according to the Sprint coverage map at »coverage.sprint.com/IMPACT.jsp?q···ge%20map , even though I had had LTE connectivity for weeks, albeit at speeds not only below spec but even below what I was getting on WiMax. (The Sensorly maps had been showing my area with LTE for several weeks, however, though it was weak, averaging three out of five bars.)
Two days ago the Sprint coverage map started showing my neighborhood with LTE for the first time. However that coverage has been designated as Fair, not Best.
As most of you probably know, Sprint has posted minimum upload and download specs for LTE at »shop2.sprint.com/en/shop/why_spr···13:4GLTE . Sprint specs promise a minimum upload speed of 2 mps and of 6 mps on the download side.
I called up Sprint to ask what their specs were for LTE in a Fair area. I was told they were 4-6 megs for download and 1-3 megs for upload.
I am pleased, therefore, to say that my LTE is finally in spec for a Fair area. Here's what I'm getting:

Of course, it's 947AM Eastern on a Sunday morning, so I have no idea whether this will stay like this or not. I am also a tad surprised that the improvement, so far, has been incremental, gradual, rather than sudden, in a big whoosh, as I had been expecting.
The bottom line is that we now have a benchmark which we can use when experiencing LTE problems in a Fair area; if we have download speeds above 4 and upload speeds above 1 then we have no beef coming; if the reverse, we can now legitimately complain to Sprint, and they have a legitimate obligation to address the issue. (Whether they do or not is a different matter, of course!) |
|
 WX MAN join:2009-12-13 Evanston, IL | I think what you are connecting to is Sprints own offering of LTE rather than Clear's new TD-LTE which is currently being installed. Sprint will be coming out later this year with some new phones (tri-frequency) that will connect to Clear's LTE on their towers. I am wondering when Clear will start to offer LTE devices to its subscribers? I do think that with 10 million subscribers (retail and wholesale) WiMAX is a money maker for them and that service will be with us for a long time. Sprint may talk more about their plans when they announce quarterly earnings at the end of this month. |
|
 criggs join:2000-07-14 New York, NY Reviews:
·Millenicom
| Which raises the following interesting question.
Right now Clear offers its own unlimited 4G service, for the amazingly low price of less than $50. When one looks closely at the service, of course, one realizes why: The WiMax rollout was never completed and, while the WiMax works fine in those areas that were completed, it simply is too immature as a network to suffice; one needs to bundle it with 3G in order to make it worth anyone's while, as so many companies, Sprint, Millenicom, Wireless 'n' WiFi, etc., have realized. Which is why the Clear unlimited service continues to be, for now, pretty useless unless one 1) doesn't travel much and 2) has good WiMax where one is most of the time.
However the Clear LTE footprint may be quite different. The Clear LTE network may very well be widespread enough, mature enough, and reliable enough, that a package which relies solely on it may be of a lot greater value than Clear's current WiMax only service. Do you believe that will indeed be the case? Because, if it is, suddenly Clear's unlimited service looks a lot more attractive, particularly if they keep it unlimited and keep the price where it is. Should that happen, it will suddenly make services like Millenicom and Wireless 'n' WiFi look like ripoff artists. |
|
 WX MAN join:2009-12-13 Evanston, IL | I was told that here in Chicago all towers will eventually get LTE capability and WiMAX service will not be changed. Right now the immediate purpose of the LTE rollout seems to be to reduce the congestion on the Sprint network. Long term your vision makes sense. |
|
 criggs join:2000-07-14 New York, NY Reviews:
·Millenicom
| Which LTE rollout? The Sprint LTE rollout or the Clear LTE rollout?
Above and beyond everything else, I find it fascinating that Clear's LTE network seems to be headed for direct competition with Sprint's LTE network, unless I've misunderstood something significantly. |
|
 WX MAN join:2009-12-13 Evanston, IL | The Clearwire LTE rollout will reduce congestion on the Sprint network. Sprint now owns both networks. I don't think that the Clear brand will ever offer smartphones to compete with the Sprint brand. |
|
 criggs join:2000-07-14 New York, NY Reviews:
·Millenicom
| Smartphones perhaps. I'm more interested in what they might make available for laptops on their LTE service. If you're right, perhaps they'll never compete with Sprint for laptops on their LTE network either. Which means that Clear's LTE will forever be simply a skeletal safety net to ease pressure on Sprint rather than a full-fledged network. |
|
 WX MAN join:2009-12-13 Evanston, IL | Maybe we will get more info from the Sprint earnings conference call on the 30th. |
|
 ivman join:2010-08-15 Shortsville, NY | reply to Chicago
WiMAX RSSI: -74 dBm WiMAX CINR: 21 dB 5.3 miles from tower 10:32 pm local time Series M modem. Netgear Wireless n300 Router.  |
|
 xrayman join:2008-12-09 Kansas City kudos:1 | reply to Chicago
PXU1900 in CradlePoint MBR-1000 WiMAX RSSI: -65 dBm WiMAX CINR: 13 dB 5.5 miles from tower External grid antenna Test at 1:40pm local time. 72°F, Lt rain, Wind Calm
Better today, but tower is overloaded at night, most of the time less than one meg down, with 1.6 megs up.
 |
|
 Reviews:
·Clear Wireless
·Comcast
·AT&T Southeast
4 edits | reply to Chicago
 15mb down | |  16mb down | |
Fort Lauderdale, Florida
*EXTERNAL* 24 dbi gain grid dish antenna, vertical polarity, mounted on a 12' pipe
Clear Hub Express 4G Summary: FREQUENCY: 2508500 KHz RSSI:-55 CINR: 29
Latency (ping time to first pingable node at tower): 53 ms (measured with Ping Plotter Pro) Jitter (measured with »speedtest.phonepower.com ): 6.8 ms
1.69 miles to tower (not in main lobe of antenna on tower)
Tests were a couple weeks apart, late evening, from a server 1000+ miles distant in Indianapolis, Indiana.
The average speed at my location is about 13mb down, and seldom below 10mb The low jitter is great for flawless VOIP and streaming video. Netflix HD is received in SUPER HD, with clarity beyond belief.
I used to laugh when a CLEAR advertisement came in the mail. I don't any more. |
|
 p110011 join:2001-12-29 Oregon City, OR | reply to Chicago
WiMAX RSSI: -63 dBm WiMAX CINR: 25 dB  |
|
 | reply to Chicago
 |
|
 | 
What a Rip-off ! ! ! |
|
 | reply to FrankSATX

dropping more! WORTHLESS ! ! ! |
|
 | 
Back up to minimal speed. I am paying for the 6Mbps unlimited. This is such a joke. D- is their grade, slower than 80% of the US. How can these people not know their company is a pathetic rip off and I would even say a scam. They are not delivering anywhere near what they advertise. This should be ILLEGAL and considered THEFT. |
|
 | 
Not really impressive is it? |
|