GeNomer
join:2013-01-21
Indianapolis, IN | reply to Boilermaker
Re: [Internet] Post your new speed tier's here 
Here is my speedtest.net result. As you can see I didn't do too much better than you on ping. I sort of feel like if you can stay under 60ish you'll be okay though. |
|
|
|
| Actually, my pings to many sites consistently hit close to 60ms.
I blame Cleveland. ;) I ran some traceroutes and pings to Google and Yahoo. My IPv6 connection is using Hurricane Electric as the tunnel broker. I was amused that Yahoo is more consistent over IPv6 than IPv4.
I realize the names of the host do not necessarily indicate their location, so Cleveland is probably not at fault. :)
traceroute: Warning: www.google.com has multiple addresses; using 74.125.225.212
traceroute to www.google.com (74.125.225.212), 64 hops max, 40 byte packets
1 10.63.16.1 (10.63.16.1) 11.291 ms 8.691 ms 9.213 ms
2 ten1-0-1.indp11-ser2.bhn.net (72.31.202.152) 10.017 ms 10.402 ms 9.967 ms
3 ten0-1-0-2.indp10-car1.bhn.net (72.31.115.54) 11.207 ms 13.247 ms 13.448 ms
4 ten7-1.indp10-cbr1.bhn.net (72.31.115.26) 12.899 ms 12.001 ms
ten1-0-0.indp10-cbr1.bhn.net (72.31.202.174) 10.337 ms
5 pch4-10.clevohek-ccr02.mwrtn.rr.com (65.189.143.26) 26.395 ms 66.910 ms 48.563 ms
6 tge1-10-0-12.clevohek-ccr01.mwrtn.rr.com (65.189.140.158) 39.632 ms 31.312 ms 31.81 7 ms
7 ae-3-0.cr0.dca20.tbone.rr.com (66.109.6.70) 37.143 ms 38.338 ms 39.810 ms
8 ae-1-0.pr0.dca10.tbone.rr.com (66.109.6.165) 41.246 ms 32.690 ms
107.14.19.135 (107.14.19.135) 33.814 ms
9 66.109.9.66 (66.109.9.66) 107.485 ms
74.125.49.181 (74.125.49.181) 109.437 ms
66.109.9.66 (66.109.9.66) 111.060 ms
10 209.85.252.46 (209.85.252.46) 34.512 ms
209.85.252.80 (209.85.252.80) 37.011 ms
209.85.252.46 (209.85.252.46) 34.025 ms
11 209.85.248.223 (209.85.248.223) 42.042 ms 41.258 ms 44.289 ms
12 72.14.237.133 (72.14.237.133) 41.305 ms 47.499 ms 41.540 ms
13 72.14.232.141 (72.14.232.141) 79.906 ms 58.716 ms 57.028 ms
14 216.239.46.54 (216.239.46.54) 62.671 ms 62.612 ms 74.645 ms
15 216.239.46.151 (216.239.46.151) 61.544 ms 66.993 ms 74.147 ms
16 209.85.251.111 (209.85.251.111) 62.539 ms 62.738 ms 63.027 ms
17 den03s06-in-f20.1e100.net (74.125.225.212) 71.044 ms 61.048 ms 63.035 ms
# ping -c 100 www.google.com
100 packets transmitted, 100 packets received, 0.0% packet loss
round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 58.370/60.369/65.409/1.353 ms
# ping6 -c 100 www.google.com
100 packets transmitted, 100 packets received, 0.0% packet loss
round-trip min/avg/max/std-dev = 99.940/106.308/115.288/3.064 ms
# ping -c 100 www.yahoo.com
100 packets transmitted, 100 packets received, 0.0% packet loss
round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 80.779/127.825/297.459/46.257 ms
# ping6 -c 100 www.yahoo.com
100 packets transmitted, 100 packets received, 0.0% packet loss
round-trip min/avg/max/std-dev = 97.171/105.849/120.520/4.147 ms |
|
 BHNtechXpertBHN StaffPremium,VIP
join:2006-02-16
Saint Petersburg, FL
kudos:82 | said by Boilermaker:Actually, my pings to many sites consistently hit close to 60ms.
I blame Cleveland. ;) I ran some traceroutes and pings to Google and Yahoo. My IPv6 connection is using Hurricane Electric as the tunnel broker. I was amused that Yahoo is more consistent over IPv6 than IPv4.
I realize the names of the host do not necessarily indicate their location, so Cleveland is probably not at fault. :)
traceroute: Warning: www.google.com has multiple addresses; using 74.125.225.212
traceroute to www.google.com (74.125.225.212), 64 hops max, 40 byte packets
1 10.63.16.1 (10.63.16.1) 11.291 ms 8.691 ms 9.213 ms
2 ten1-0-1.indp11-ser2.bhn.net (72.31.202.152) 10.017 ms 10.402 ms 9.967 ms
3 ten0-1-0-2.indp10-car1.bhn.net (72.31.115.54) 11.207 ms 13.247 ms 13.448 ms
4 ten7-1.indp10-cbr1.bhn.net (72.31.115.26) 12.899 ms 12.001 ms
ten1-0-0.indp10-cbr1.bhn.net (72.31.202.174) 10.337 ms
5 pch4-10.clevohek-ccr02.mwrtn.rr.com (65.189.143.26) 26.395 ms 66.910 ms 48.563 ms
6 tge1-10-0-12.clevohek-ccr01.mwrtn.rr.com (65.189.140.158) 39.632 ms 31.312 ms 31.81 7 ms
7 ae-3-0.cr0.dca20.tbone.rr.com (66.109.6.70) 37.143 ms 38.338 ms 39.810 ms
8 ae-1-0.pr0.dca10.tbone.rr.com (66.109.6.165) 41.246 ms 32.690 ms
107.14.19.135 (107.14.19.135) 33.814 ms
9 66.109.9.66 (66.109.9.66) 107.485 ms
74.125.49.181 (74.125.49.181) 109.437 ms
66.109.9.66 (66.109.9.66) 111.060 ms
10 209.85.252.46 (209.85.252.46) 34.512 ms
209.85.252.80 (209.85.252.80) 37.011 ms
209.85.252.46 (209.85.252.46) 34.025 ms
11 209.85.248.223 (209.85.248.223) 42.042 ms 41.258 ms 44.289 ms
12 72.14.237.133 (72.14.237.133) 41.305 ms 47.499 ms 41.540 ms
13 72.14.232.141 (72.14.232.141) 79.906 ms 58.716 ms 57.028 ms
14 216.239.46.54 (216.239.46.54) 62.671 ms 62.612 ms 74.645 ms
15 216.239.46.151 (216.239.46.151) 61.544 ms 66.993 ms 74.147 ms
16 209.85.251.111 (209.85.251.111) 62.539 ms 62.738 ms 63.027 ms
17 den03s06-in-f20.1e100.net (74.125.225.212) 71.044 ms 61.048 ms 63.035 ms
# ping -c 100 www.google.com
100 packets transmitted, 100 packets received, 0.0% packet loss
round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 58.370/60.369/65.409/1.353 ms
# ping6 -c 100 www.google.com
100 packets transmitted, 100 packets received, 0.0% packet loss
round-trip min/avg/max/std-dev = 99.940/106.308/115.288/3.064 ms
# ping -c 100 www.yahoo.com
100 packets transmitted, 100 packets received, 0.0% packet loss
round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 80.779/127.825/297.459/46.257 ms
# ping6 -c 100 www.yahoo.com
100 packets transmitted, 100 packets received, 0.0% packet loss
round-trip min/avg/max/std-dev = 97.171/105.849/120.520/4.147 ms Can we just blame Cleveland because it's Cleveland? LOL ;)
--
~All truth goes through three phases. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as self-evident. - Arthur Schopenhauer ~
|
|
| said by BHNtechXpert:Can we just blame Cleveland because it's Cleveland? LOL  To those from Cleveland, no. I will not blame Cleveland.
To everyone else, of course I blame Cleveland.
I think I am ready for politics.  |
|
BHNtechXpertBHN StaffPremium,VIP
join:2006-02-16
Saint Petersburg, FL
kudos:82 | said by Boilermaker:said by BHNtechXpert:Can we just blame Cleveland because it's Cleveland? LOL To those from Cleveland, no. I will not blame Cleveland. To everyone else, of course I blame Cleveland. I think I am ready for politics. LOL
--
~All truth goes through three phases. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as self-evident. - Arthur Schopenhauer ~
|
|
| reply to bigdaddy
this is a wireless test downstairs from router with new turbo |
|
| business class |
|
| What is highest speed tier for business class user's now a day's ? |
|
| 70/5 |
|
BHNtechXpertBHN StaffPremium,VIP
join:2006-02-16
Saint Petersburg, FL
kudos:82
1 edit | .... |
|
| reply to bhn_bus_sol
So residential and Business class internet have the same level's of speed it would seem. |
|
BHNtechXpertBHN StaffPremium,VIP
join:2006-02-16
Saint Petersburg, FL
kudos:82
1 edit | No...
--
~All truth goes through three phases. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as self-evident. - Arthur Schopenhauer ~
|
|
| said by BHNtechXpert:said by bigdaddy:So residential and Business class internet have the same level's of speed it would seem. No... Oh how so ? |
|
BHNtechXpertBHN StaffPremium,VIP
join:2006-02-16
Saint Petersburg, FL
kudos:82 | They just aren't. Your top tier residential is 60mbps whereas Business Solutions is 70mbps. |
|
1 edit | back on topic. |
|
| Come on guy's let's keep it going. |
|
| 
--
Bakersfield Region Taft CA Brighthouse Customer Since 2003 |
|
| »www.speedtest.net/result/2460488959.png |
|
| reply to bigdaddy
It was at 99% at one point but I didn't save it.
lol |
|
| Test taken at 2:50 AM 1/25/2013 |
|
