<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Topic &#x27;Re: Been awhile since Charter increased speeds&#x27; in forum &#x27;Charter Internet/TV&#x27; - dslreports.com</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Been-awhile-since-Charter-increased-speeds-27922524</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 15:44:03 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 15:44:03 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: Missing the point.</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Missing-the-point-27959854</link>
<description><![CDATA[thewayitis posted : Your talking about Charter. Multiple devises/clients. They are not ready for it. So many residents and businesses use POP3 it is going to be a nightmare. IMAP is good when it works.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Missing-the-point-27959854</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2013 20:55:40 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Missing the point.</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Missing-the-point-27959645</link>
<description><![CDATA[msmisfit posted : What advantage would that be to Charter?  Do you know or did they say?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Missing-the-point-27959645</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2013 19:44:17 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Missing the point.</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Missing-the-point-27959558</link>
<description><![CDATA[thewayitis posted : Charter techs give them a call.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Missing-the-point-27959558</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2013 19:14:50 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Missing the point.</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Missing-the-point-27958580</link>
<description><![CDATA[msmisfit posted : <div class="bquote"><said>said by <a href="/profile/1301456" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1301456');">thewayitis</a>:</said><p>Crap is going to hit the fan when customers find out POP3 is no longer support by Charter only IMAP.<br> </p></div>Source, please?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Missing-the-point-27958580</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2013 14:11:56 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Missing the point.</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Missing-the-point-27956501</link>
<description><![CDATA[thewayitis posted : My blood pressure is sky high with this tread I can go back 25 years and it is the same old thing with Charter!<br><br>YES! I want 3mg. NO! I do not want 30mg!<br><br>I purchased a mac today and got a second mac for 25 cents!<br><br>Crap is going to hit the fan when customers find out POP3 is no longer support by Charter only IMAP.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Missing-the-point-27956501</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2013 20:40:48 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Been awhile since Charter increased speeds</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Been-awhile-since-Charter-increased-speeds-27954025</link>
<description><![CDATA[cork1958 posted : I could not have answered that response any better myself, horseathalt7!! :)<br><br>Must eat out at McDonalds and Burger King every night also, to always be comparing those rotten apples to rotted oranges!<br><small>--<br>The Firefox alternative.<br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://www.mozilla.org/projects/seamonkey/" >www.mozilla.org/projects/seamonkey/</A></small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Been-awhile-since-Charter-increased-speeds-27954025</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2013 08:21:50 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Been awhile since Charter increased speeds</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Been-awhile-since-Charter-increased-speeds-27953664</link>
<description><![CDATA[horseathalt7 posted : <div class="bquote"><said>said by anon anon :</said><p> <br>OK so say Charter now just makes the $50 tier $30. Would people then expect Charter to offer a promo price still? <br><br></p></div><b>No, because at 30$/mo that 30mb tier would be a FANTASTIC value and would drive a LOT of volume business which would still allow charter to make a tidy profit. </b><br><br><div class="bquote"><p> Are you saying if Charter lowered the price to $30 you would be quiet and never complain about the price again nor would you expect promo pricing?<br><br> </p></div><b> YES!<br><br>The reason why is that if that 30/mo was the everyday regular price without a contract it would be a very good deal without all the promo nonsense!  You know Charter would gain a LOT of good will if they would break the habit of the promo nonsense and just offer a very good value oriented everyday price with NO STRINGS ATTACHED. <br><br> Now of course I don't want or need 30mb and would prefer that they still offered a 3mb tier at 20/mo. But I would be more willing to stay with Charter if they were willing to be aware of different needs and requirements for different household budgets. </B>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Been-awhile-since-Charter-increased-speeds-27953664</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2013 01:10:41 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Been awhile since Charter increased speeds</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Been-awhile-since-Charter-increased-speeds-27952419</link>
<description><![CDATA[anon posted : <div class="bquote"><said>said by <a href="/profile/1834550" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1834550');">horseathalt7</a>:</said><p>Well you see 20$/ mo may seem like NOTHING to CEOs at ATT and Charter, BUT for the ordinary joe it adds up to quite a bit over a year or more.  So folks MUST play that idiotic game whether they like it or not IF they want the internet and want to be able to stay within a budget.<br><br>The fact is that the economy still is TERRIBLE for MOST consumers.<br> </p></div>OK so say Charter now just makes the $50 tier $30. Would people then expect Charter to offer a promo price still? And thus that promo price would have to be less than $30. And wouldn't those same people expect to keep that new promo price forever because after all $30 is just too expensive? Are you saying if hcarter lowere the price to $30 you would be quiet and never complain about the price again nor would you expect promo pricing?<br><br>By the way 25 Meg used to be $75 a month 5 years ago, then 30 meg was $58 now it's $50. Some how people are being ripped off even though speeds and pricing have dropped.<br><br>You know McDonald's should offer Big Macs for $1 all the time. I would go a lot more often if they did. I don't now how they expect regular people to pay $3 for a Big Mac. Stupid greedy McDonald's CEOs. Sure it's easy for THEM to pay $3 they're rich!]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Been-awhile-since-Charter-increased-speeds-27952419</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jan 2013 16:36:28 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Been awhile since Charter increased speeds</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Been-awhile-since-Charter-increased-speeds-27952089</link>
<description><![CDATA[horseathalt7 posted : <div class="bquote"><said>said by anon anon :</said><p>If playing musical ISPs every year is how one saves $20 a month then well that's their decision. Personally I think I would find some other way to save $20 a month. Constantly switching ISPs seems a bit of a pain in the behind.<br> </p></div>Well you see 20$/ mo may seem like NOTHING to CEOs at ATT and Charter, BUT for the ordinary joe it adds up to quite a bit over a year or more.  So folks MUST play that idiotic game whether they like it or not IF they want the internet and want to be able to stay within a budget.<br><br>The fact is that the economy still is TERRIBLE for MOST consumers.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Been-awhile-since-Charter-increased-speeds-27952089</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jan 2013 14:23:47 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Been awhile since Charter increased speeds</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Been-awhile-since-Charter-increased-speeds-27951047</link>
<description><![CDATA[cork1958 posted : <div class="bquote"><said>said by <a href="/profile/1388353" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1388353');">Balplanman</a>:</said><p><div class="bquote"><said>said by anon anon :</said><p>Sure and you realize your U-verse pricing was also a promotion and when that ended you would not get that extended.<br><br>Fact is in my area 12 Mbps U-verse is $48 a month( non promo ) and 18 Mbps Uverse( if you can get it ) is $53 a month. Sorry Charter's 30 meg for $50 is better than either. Why would I pay $3 MORE per month for 40% LESS speed? And a $2 per month savings isn't worth a 60% reduction in speed either.<br><br>OK say you have 100 customers getting $30 promo That's $3000 a month for those 100 customers. Now say promo ends and the price goes back up to $50. Now let's say 30% of those customers leave. Charter still has 70 customers paying $50 a month which is $3500. A 17% INCREASE in income.<br><br>And even if 40% left you'd be at the same $3000 but Charter is better off because they have 40% less customers to deal with which means reduced costs. Now it's doubtful 30% will leave let alone 40%.<br><br> </p></div>I agree it would be irrational for you to spend more to get less. But you're talking a couple dollars difference per month - I wouldn't change for that saving either.  <br><br>I don't understand why you think I should not take advantage of a promo that saves me $39 per month and delivers equivalent service.  If this means I must switch back and forth between ATT and Charter yearly to continue to get promo pricing (which Charter used to provide continuously if you asked) then I can (and will) do that.<br><br>You can make up straw man examples that "prove" your point but that doesn't work when you use the real numbers that Charter supplied to me.  My street is short, just 10 houses, and I've talked to a few of my neighbors who asked how ATT is working out for me.  They're interested because Charter's recent rate increase got their attention.  So far, two neighbors said they intend to switch to ATT when their Charter contract runs out.  This supports your 30% number - but it could increase because when an ATT truck shows up other neighbors will notice (small town USA).<br><br>For my street with 10 people, using Charter's promo rate of $117 they would collect 10*117=$1170 month.  If all 10 paid the new rate then they would get 10*147=$1470 per mo.  If 3 of us drop Charter (as seems likely) then Charter gets: 7*147=$1029 per mo.  So, Charter loses $1170-1029=$141 per month on my street over simply extending their promo. <br><br>That is, using your 30% expected drop rate and Charter's actual numbers, Charter loses about 12% vs maintaining their promo rate.  <br> </p></div>If you can save $39 a month for a year, which equals $468, which will pay for the first 9 months, at roughly $50 a month, of you signing back up for Charter after AT&T's promo ends, why WOULDN'T you go for it?<br><br>I know if I could get Uverse here and not have to use their phone line, I WOULD be playing the ISP hopping game. I probably would do this right now, if I knew for sure I could get Frontiers advertised speed of 25M download and if they still had dry DSL.<br><br>It's no more of a hassle, which is debatable as we all know what calling Charter is like, than calling Charter all the time to play that promo hopping game!<br><small>--<br>The Firefox alternative.<br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://www.mozilla.org/projects/seamonkey/" >www.mozilla.org/projects/seamonkey/</A></small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Been-awhile-since-Charter-increased-speeds-27951047</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jan 2013 06:27:29 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Been awhile since Charter increased speeds</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Been-awhile-since-Charter-increased-speeds-27951010</link>
<description><![CDATA[anon posted : <div class="bquote"><said>said by <a href="/profile/1388353" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1388353');">Balplanman</a>:</said><p> I don't understand why you think I should not take advantage of a promo that saves me $39 per month and delivers equivalent service.</p></div>I didn't say you shouldn't I am making you aware those savings are temporay not permanent and at&t just like Charter won't extent your promo. At that time are you going to be on the u-verse boards posting about how it would be better for at&t just to extend your promo? If not why not?<br><br><div class="bquote"><p>You can make up straw man examples that "prove" your point but that doesn't work when you use the real numbers that Charter supplied to me.  My street is short, just 10 houses, and I've talked to a few of my neighbors who asked how ATT is working out for me.  They're interested because Charter's recent rate increase got their attention.  So far, two neighbors said they intend to switch to ATT when their Charter contract runs out.  This supports your 30% number - but it could increase because when an ATT truck shows up other neighbors will notice (small town USA).<br><br>For my street with 10 people, using Charter's promo rate of $117 they would collect 10*117=$1170 month.  If all 10 paid the new rate then they would get 10*147=$1470 per mo.  If 3 of us drop Charter (as seems likely) then Charter gets: 7*147=$1029 per mo.  So, Charter loses $1170-1029=$141 per month on my street over simply extending their promo.<br><br>That is, using your 30% expected drop rate and Charter's actual numbers, Charter loses about 12% vs maintaining their promo rate.<br> </p></div>And once their promos for at&t end they'll come back to Charter because they'll be eligible for Charter promos again which makes Charter far cheaper than at&t's regular pricing. Just like at&t's promo pricing is cheaper than Charter's regular pricing.<br><br>If playing musical ISPs every year is how one saves $20 a month then well that's their decision. Personally I think I would find some other way to save $20 a month. Constantly switching ISPs seems a bit of a pain in the behind.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Been-awhile-since-Charter-increased-speeds-27951010</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jan 2013 05:30:32 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Been awhile since Charter increased speeds</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Been-awhile-since-Charter-increased-speeds-27949326</link>
<description><![CDATA[Balplanman posted : <div class="bquote"><said>said by anon anon :</said><p>Sure and you realize your U-verse pricing was also a promotion and when that ended you would not get that extended.<br><br>Fact is in my area 12 Mbps U-verse is $48 a month( non promo ) and 18 Mbps Uverse( if you can get it ) is $53 a month. Sorry Charter's 30 meg for $50 is better than either. Why would I pay $3 MORE per month for 40% LESS speed? And a $2 per month savings isn't worth a 60% reduction in speed either.<br><br>OK say you have 100 customers getting $30 promo That's $3000 a month for those 100 customers. Now say promo ends and the price goes back up to $50. Now let's say 30% of those customers leave. Charter still has 70 customers paying $50 a month which is $3500. A 17% INCREASE in income.<br><br>And even if 40% left you'd be at the same $3000 but Charter is better off because they have 40% less customers to deal with which means reduced costs. Now it's doubtful 30% will leave let alone 40%.<br><br> </p></div>I agree it would be irrational for you to spend more to get less. But you're talking a couple dollars difference per month - I wouldn't change for that saving either.  <br><br>I don't understand why you think I should not take advantage of a promo that saves me $39 per month and delivers equivalent service.  If this means I must switch back and forth between ATT and Charter yearly to continue to get promo pricing (which Charter used to provide continuously if you asked) then I can (and will) do that.<br><br>You can make up straw man examples that "prove" your point but that doesn't work when you use the real numbers that Charter supplied to me.  My street is short, just 10 houses, and I've talked to a few of my neighbors who asked how ATT is working out for me.  They're interested because Charter's recent rate increase got their attention.  So far, two neighbors said they intend to switch to ATT when their Charter contract runs out.  This supports your 30% number - but it could increase because when an ATT truck shows up other neighbors will notice (small town USA).<br><br>For my street with 10 people, using Charter's promo rate of $117 they would collect 10*117=$1170 month.  If all 10 paid the new rate then they would get 10*147=$1470 per mo.  If 3 of us drop Charter (as seems likely) then Charter gets: 7*147=$1029 per mo.  So, Charter loses $1170-1029=$141 per month on my street over simply extending their promo. <br><br>That is, using your 30% expected drop rate and Charter's actual numbers, Charter loses about 12% vs maintaining their promo rate.  ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Been-awhile-since-Charter-increased-speeds-27949326</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jan 2013 12:04:02 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Missing the point.</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Missing-the-point-27948862</link>
<description><![CDATA[cork1958 posted : <div class="bquote"><said>said by <a href="/profile/1834550" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1834550');">horseathalt7</a>:</said><p>People aren't as upset about the promo price ending as much as the fact that there is NO less expensive Charter alternative tier of service if you can't or do not want to pay the high price for that 30mb plan. <br> </p></div>Exactly!!<br><small>--<br>The Firefox alternative.<br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://www.mozilla.org/projects/seamonkey/" >www.mozilla.org/projects/seamonkey/</A></small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Missing-the-point-27948862</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jan 2013 08:00:18 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Been awhile since Charter increased speeds</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Been-awhile-since-Charter-increased-speeds-27948843</link>
<description><![CDATA[norton posted : ++]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Been-awhile-since-Charter-increased-speeds-27948843</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jan 2013 07:50:36 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Been awhile since Charter increased speeds</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Been-awhile-since-Charter-increased-speeds-27948570</link>
<description><![CDATA[anon posted : <div class="bquote"><said>said by <a href="/profile/1388353" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1388353');">Balplanman</a>:</said><p>Last time around there was a Uverse option, which I pointed out, but they said they could no longer offer promo rates.  So,  rather than accept a 26% increase we changed to Uverse and got a 7% decrease.  From my perspective this was purely a business decision - I wasn't upset or outraged.</p></div>Sure and you realize your U-verse pricing was also a promotion and when that ended you would not get that extended.<br><br>Fact is in my area 12 Mbps U-verse is $48 a month( non promo ) and 18 Mbps Uverse( if you can get it ) is $53 a month. Sorry Charter's 30 meg for $50 is better than either. Why would I pay $3 MORE per month for 40% LESS speed? And a $2 per month savings isn't worth a 60% reduction in speed either.<br><br><div class="bquote"><p>A few weeks later Charter called and offered the same rate we are getting for Uverse and also offered to cover the ATT contract cancellation fee if we returned as a customer.  This week I received a Charter promo offer in the mail with even better rates.</p></div>A few weeks? Well of course. After 30 days of not being a customer you are eligble for promo pricing again. You didn't get special treatment. Charter had had that policy for YEARS.<br><br><i>GENERAL DISCLAIMER&copy;2013 Charter Communications, Inc. Offers are valid for a limited time only, to qualifying residential <b>customers who have not subscribed to applicable services within the previous 30 days</b> and have no outstanding obligation to Charter. Standard rates apply after promotion.</i><br><br><div class="bquote"><p>My post was simply a response to your description of how Charter would lose money by offering promos to existing customers.  To me, it seems clear that Charter would have done better by offering me a promo when I asked.  The offers they've made since support this.</p></div>Nope, because most people won't do what you do and will just deal with the price increase.<br><br>OK say you have 100 customers getting $30 promo That's $3000 a month for those 100 customers. Now say promo ends and the price goes back up to $50. Now let's say 30% of those customers leave. Charter still has 70 customers paying $50 a month which is $3500. A 17% INCREASE in income.<br><br>And even if 40% left you'd be at the same $3000 but Charter is better off because they have 40% less customers to deal with which means reduced costs. Now it's doubtful 30% will leave let alone 40%.<br><br><div class="bquote"><p>To extend your 55 cent Whopper example, I'd expect it to be difficult to make sales after raising the price of Whoppers to 80 cents when customers can get a Big Mac for 50 cents  ;-)<br> </p></div>Except Burger King raised the price back to $3 not 80 cents and they still sell well.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Been-awhile-since-Charter-increased-speeds-27948570</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jan 2013 04:37:18 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Been awhile since Charter increased speeds</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Been-awhile-since-Charter-increased-speeds-27948396</link>
<description><![CDATA[Balplanman posted : We live 1 mile from the Charter office so for near 15 years we've been going there when our promo runs out and they've given us a new promo deal.  The employees told us that was how things worked so we did it.  Most of this time Charter was the only option.<br><br>Last time around there was a Uverse option, which I pointed out, but they said they could no longer offer promo rates.  So,  rather than accept a 26% increase we changed to Uverse and got a 7% decrease.  From my perspective this was purely a business decision - I wasn't upset or outraged.<br><br>A few weeks later Charter called and offered the same rate we are getting for Uverse and also offered to cover the ATT contract cancellation fee if we returned as a customer.  This week I received a Charter promo offer in the mail with even better rates.<br><br>My post was simply a response to your description of how Charter would lose money by offering promos to existing customers.  To me, it seems clear that Charter would have done better by offering me a promo when I asked.  The offers they've made since support this.<br><br>To extend your 55 cent Whopper example, I'd expect it to be difficult to make sales after raising the price of Whoppers to 80 cents when customers can get a Big Mac for 50 cents  ;-)]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Been-awhile-since-Charter-increased-speeds-27948396</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2013 22:56:25 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Been awhile since Charter increased speeds</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Been-awhile-since-Charter-increased-speeds-27948036</link>
<description><![CDATA[KoRnGtL15 posted : I wonder if my local office is handing those out now? Might have to go down there since the modem is free now. <br><br><div class="bquote"><said>said by <a href="/profile/1760153" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1760153');">duffman45200</a>:</said><p><div class="bquote"><said>said by <a href="/profile/1578597" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1578597');">Metatron2008</a>:</said><p>I believe the ubee's that charter gave out support 8x4..<br> </p></div>I moved in August (and added TV) and therefore had to get a modem from charter.  Then one they gave me was a ubee ddm352 which is a 8x4.  <br> </p></div>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Been-awhile-since-Charter-increased-speeds-27948036</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2013 20:31:58 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Been awhile since Charter increased speeds</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Been-awhile-since-Charter-increased-speeds-27947913</link>
<description><![CDATA[duffman45200 posted : <div class="bquote"><said>said by <a href="/profile/1578597" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1578597');">Metatron2008</a>:</said><p>I believe the ubee's that charter gave out support 8x4..<br> </p></div>I moved in August (and added TV) and therefore had to get a modem from charter.  Then one they gave me was a ubee ddm352 which is a 8x4.  ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Been-awhile-since-Charter-increased-speeds-27947913</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2013 19:46:04 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Missing the point.</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Missing-the-point-27947698</link>
<description><![CDATA[anon posted : <div class="bquote"><said>said by <a href="/profile/1834550" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1834550');">horseathalt7</a>:</said><p>People aren't as upset about the promo price ending as much as the fact that there is NO less expensive Charter alternative tier of service if you can't or do not want to pay the high price for that 30mb plan.<br> </p></div>No actually they are mad about promo pricing not being permanent. If Charter brought back the 3 Meg tier for $25 and it's 100 GB cap, that might be ok for you, but people used to 30 meg and higher caps would still be upset their pricing went form $30 to $50. They would not be interrested in 3 Mbps.<br><br>Most( not all, but most ) Charter customers solely worried about pricing not speed do have other choices.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Missing-the-point-27947698</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2013 19:26:24 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Been awhile since Charter increased speeds</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Been-awhile-since-Charter-increased-speeds-27947841</link>
<description><![CDATA[KoRnGtL15 posted : Just looked up specs. Nope. :/<br><br>DOCSIS 3.0 CM with 4 Downstream + 4 upstream bonding<br><br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://www.ubeeinteractive.com/products/cable/u10c035" >www.ubeeinteractive.com/products&middot;&middot;&middot;/u10c035</A>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Been-awhile-since-Charter-increased-speeds-27947841</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2013 19:25:44 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Been awhile since Charter increased speeds</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Been-awhile-since-Charter-increased-speeds-27947822</link>
<description><![CDATA[Metatron2008 posted : I believe the ubee's that charter gave out support 8x4..]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Been-awhile-since-Charter-increased-speeds-27947822</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2013 19:18:41 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Been awhile since Charter increased speeds</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Been-awhile-since-Charter-increased-speeds-27947645</link>
<description><![CDATA[duffman45200 posted : <div class="bquote"><said>said by <a href="/profile/1428085" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1428085');">KoRnGtL15</a>:</said><p>I am currently on the 100mb/5mb tier. That is why I am curious if my current modem would support those new speeds. <br><br><div class="bquote"><said>said by <a href="/profile/1760153" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1760153');">duffman45200</a>:</said><p>That modem would be fine if they did a 50/10 or something along those lines.  It would really only be needed for anything more than the 100 MB package.  I think the max for each downstream channel is in the 30-40 range, not sure about each upstream but either way a 4x4 modem should be able to support at least a 120/20 connection<br> </p></div> </p></div> I think max downstream for 4x4 modems is around 150]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Been-awhile-since-Charter-increased-speeds-27947645</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2013 18:17:27 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Been awhile since Charter increased speeds</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Been-awhile-since-Charter-increased-speeds-27947524</link>
<description><![CDATA[KoRnGtL15 posted : I am currently on the 100mb/5mb tier. That is why I am curious if my current modem would support those new speeds. <br><br><div class="bquote"><said>said by <a href="/profile/1760153" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1760153');">duffman45200</a>:</said><p>That modem would be fine if they did a 50/10 or something along those lines.  It would really only be needed for anything more than the 100 MB package.  I think the max for each downstream channel is in the 30-40 range, not sure about each upstream but either way a 4x4 modem should be able to support at least a 120/20 connection<br> </p></div>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Been-awhile-since-Charter-increased-speeds-27947524</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2013 17:27:57 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Been awhile since Charter increased speeds</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Been-awhile-since-Charter-increased-speeds-27947420</link>
<description><![CDATA[duffman45200 posted : <div class="bquote"><said>said by <a href="/profile/1428085" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1428085');">KoRnGtL15</a>:</said><p>If true. Will this require a new modem? I have a Ubee U10C035<br><br><div class="bquote"><said>said by <a href="/profile/1760153" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1760153');">duffman45200</a>:</said><p><div class="bquote"><said>said by <a href="/profile/1620667" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1620667');">Jazzemt</a>:</said><p>Three channel for upstream and 8 for downstream is around the corner. <br> </p></div>Hoping this is true<br> </p></div> </p></div>That modem would be fine if they did a 50/10 or something along those lines.  It would really only be needed for anything more than the 100 MB package.  I think the max for each downstream channel is in the 30-40 range, not sure about each upstream but either way a 4x4 modem should be able to support at least a 120/20 connection]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Been-awhile-since-Charter-increased-speeds-27947420</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2013 16:49:03 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Been awhile since Charter increased speeds</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Been-awhile-since-Charter-increased-speeds-27947365</link>
<description><![CDATA[KoRnGtL15 posted : If true. Will this require a new modem? I have a Ubee U10C035<br><br><div class="bquote"><said>said by <a href="/profile/1760153" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1760153');">duffman45200</a>:</said><p><div class="bquote"><said>said by <a href="/profile/1620667" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1620667');">Jazzemt</a>:</said><p>Three channel for upstream and 8 for downstream is around the corner. <br> </p></div>Hoping this is true<br> </p></div>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Been-awhile-since-Charter-increased-speeds-27947365</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2013 16:28:49 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Missing the point.</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Missing-the-point-27947092</link>
<description><![CDATA[horseathalt7 posted : People aren't as upset about the promo price ending as much as the fact that there is NO less expensive Charter alternative tier of service if you can't or do not want to pay the high price for that 30mb plan. ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Missing-the-point-27947092</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2013 15:07:00 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Been awhile since Charter increased speeds</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Been-awhile-since-Charter-increased-speeds-27945810</link>
<description><![CDATA[duffman45200 posted : <div class="bquote"><said>said by <a href="/profile/1620667" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1620667');">Jazzemt</a>:</said><p>Three channel for upstream and 8 for downstream is around the corner. <br> </p></div>Hoping this is true]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Been-awhile-since-Charter-increased-speeds-27945810</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2013 09:00:41 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Been awhile since Charter increased speeds</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Been-awhile-since-Charter-increased-speeds-27945571</link>
<description><![CDATA[cork1958 posted : For once I agree with you, as we all know who you are, anon anon! ;)<br><br>I wish Charter would quit doing promo's also. I always figured if they can do those prices for anyone for 2 years, as they obviously must not be losing money on the deal, why not just make that the regular price for everyone for 2 years WITHOUT raising prices twice a year?!<br><br>Never have played that promo hopping game with them myself, but now that they have such limited choices on HSI, I might could start considering playing that ISP hopping game!<br><small>--<br>The Firefox alternative.<br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://www.mozilla.org/projects/seamonkey/" >www.mozilla.org/projects/seamonkey/</A></small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Been-awhile-since-Charter-increased-speeds-27945571</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2013 06:44:06 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Been awhile since Charter increased speeds</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Been-awhile-since-Charter-increased-speeds-27945441</link>
<description><![CDATA[anon posted : <div class="bquote"><said>said by <a href="/profile/1388353" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1388353');">Balplanman</a>:</said><p>As you say, you don't have numbers.  Assuming that Charter has reliable numbers is also speculation on your part.  It could just as well be a seat of the pants decision by the new leader to make his mark.<br><br>In November 2012 our 2 year deal with Charter ran out so rates were going from $117 to $147 for TV and internet.  Charter was hard nosed about this increase. We moved to Uverse for $108.    Two months later Charter called and offered a deal for a similar price (but fewer TV channels).   Based on this, my guess is that Charter is getting some pushback from people like me who have an option.<br><br>Charter loses a lot more when a customer drops them than when a customer changes tiers - seems like they should notice when some customers have options, especially when a customer comes to their office and shows them those options (as I did).<br><br>With Uverse we upgraded the number of TV channels considerably but lowered the internet from 15/3 to 12/1.5 at a monthly total of $108.<br><br>Internet seems about the same, Vonage phone works better(clearer audio), TV has more channels, DVR is easier to use. So far we're happy -- time will tell if it was a good move but the cost difference made it hard to resist. We weren't unhappy with Charter's service, just the cost.<br> </p></div>So what you are saying you had a 2 year promo which you KNEW would end because after all it's a "2 YEAR" promo so it's kind of obvious it has a time limit. But now despite this knowledge for 2 years you are upset Charter doesn't continue to give you a PROMO price forever? If I was Charter I'd stop doing promos all together since the large amount of customers that don't seem to understand the definition of PROMO.<br><br>Burger King has a promo for a month where Whoppers are 55 cents. When the promo ends I don't see any outrage that they don't continue to selll Whoppers for that price. I wonder why the disconnect?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Been-awhile-since-Charter-increased-speeds-27945441</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2013 04:40:38 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Been awhile since Charter increased speeds</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Been-awhile-since-Charter-increased-speeds-27945437</link>
<description><![CDATA[anon posted : <div class="bquote"><said>said by <a href="/profile/532555" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=532555');">mmainprize</a>:</said><p><div class="bquote"><said>said by anon anon :</said><p><div class="bquote"><said>said by <a href="/profile/532555" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=532555');">mmainprize</a>:</said><p>For that same $50 bucks you can get Phone and Data service over wireless. For the customer that want internet at home also a low price tier would be fine.</p></div>WHERE?<br> </p></div>ANYWHERE, it is wireless.<br><br>Just watch some TV you will see the ads, now that half of all channel time is ads.<br> </p></div>You can 4G LTE speeds and at least 250 GB cap for $50 a month AND cell service. Who has this now? What cell company is this?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Been-awhile-since-Charter-increased-speeds-27945437</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2013 04:39:59 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Been awhile since Charter increased speeds</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Been-awhile-since-Charter-increased-speeds-27945473</link>
<description><![CDATA[cork1958 posted : Can't reply!<br><br>Edit:<br>Hmm? It worked that time.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Been-awhile-since-Charter-increased-speeds-27945473</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2013 04:33:35 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Been awhile since Charter increased speeds</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Been-awhile-since-Charter-increased-speeds-27945470</link>
<description><![CDATA[cork1958 posted : <div class="bquote"><said>said by Orth :</said><p>And it also states "The fee is not listed on Charter's site listing of fees, and users say it's often inconsistently applied." Again, this is not the fee you are thinking of.<br><br>Also the "change of service computerized fee" used to be named the "service restoration fee" which is where all this confusion is coming into play. Sadly that article is incorrect. Trust me on this, as someone on the inside at Charter, this isn't the $1.99 payment by phone fee everyone thinks it is.<br> </p></div>You don't have a clue as to what you're talking about whether you're on the "inside" or not!<br><br>This fee applies to you CHANGING ANYTHING with your account, plain and simple! You can get it removed if you complain though.<br><br>I know the folks on the phone are usually dumber than a box of rocks, but I JUST called TWICE and that is EXACTLY what I was told.<br><br>It applies when you increase, decrease, add or subtract ANY service. Heck, it probably applies even if you change from paper billing to paperless, knowing Charter.<br><small>--<br>The Firefox alternative.<br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://www.mozilla.org/projects/seamonkey/" >www.mozilla.org/projects/seamonkey/</A></small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Been-awhile-since-Charter-increased-speeds-27945470</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2013 04:31:28 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Been awhile since Charter increased speeds</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Been-awhile-since-Charter-increased-speeds-27945383</link>
<description><![CDATA[mmainprize posted : <div class="bquote"><said>said by anon anon :</said><p><div class="bquote"><said>said by <a href="/profile/532555" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=532555');">mmainprize</a>:</said><p>For that same $50 bucks you can get Phone and Data service over wireless. For the customer that want internet at home also a low price tier would be fine.</p></div>WHERE?<br> </p></div>ANYWHERE, it is wireless.<br><br>Just watch some TV you will see the ads, now that half of all channel time is ads.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Been-awhile-since-Charter-increased-speeds-27945383</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2013 01:51:21 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Been awhile since Charter increased speeds</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Been-awhile-since-Charter-increased-speeds-27945253</link>
<description><![CDATA[Jazzemt posted : Three channel for upstream and 8 for downstream is around the corner. ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Been-awhile-since-Charter-increased-speeds-27945253</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2013 00:20:26 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Been awhile since Charter increased speeds</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Been-awhile-since-Charter-increased-speeds-27944000</link>
<description><![CDATA[ToxicDrew posted : Sorry i'm in Western Massachusetts.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Been-awhile-since-Charter-increased-speeds-27944000</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2013 17:19:14 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Been awhile since Charter increased speeds</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Been-awhile-since-Charter-increased-speeds-27943704</link>
<description><![CDATA[Confidence posted : <div class="bquote"><said>said by <a href="/profile/482073" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=482073');">ToxicDrew</a>:</said><p>I had a chatty tech over two days ago and he told me my area was going to be upgraded to 4 channel upstream bonding and 120meg soon. Can't say if he was just talking BS.<br> </p></div>And what area would that be you speak of?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Been-awhile-since-Charter-increased-speeds-27943704</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2013 15:46:12 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Been awhile since Charter increased speeds</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Been-awhile-since-Charter-increased-speeds-27943601</link>
<description><![CDATA[ToxicDrew posted : I had a chatty tech over two days ago and he told me my area was going to be upgraded to 4 channel upstream bonding and 120meg soon. Can't say if he was just talking BS.<br><small>--<br>dream your dreams with open eyes and make them come true...</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Been-awhile-since-Charter-increased-speeds-27943601</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2013 15:20:18 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Been awhile since Charter increased speeds</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Been-awhile-since-Charter-increased-speeds-27942277</link>
<description><![CDATA[duffman45200 posted : Nothing on this?  Any of the Charter techs lurking have any info to leak on speed increases?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Been-awhile-since-Charter-increased-speeds-27942277</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2013 08:25:42 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Been awhile since Charter increased speeds</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Been-awhile-since-Charter-increased-speeds-27930032</link>
<description><![CDATA[Balplanman posted : As you say, you don't have numbers.  Assuming that Charter has reliable numbers is also speculation on your part.  It could just as well be a seat of the pants decision by the new leader to make his mark. <br><br>In November 2012 our 2 year deal with Charter ran out so rates were going from $117 to $147 for TV and internet.  Charter was hard nosed about this increase. We moved to Uverse for $108.    Two months later Charter called and offered a deal for a similar price (but fewer TV channels).   Based on this, my guess is that Charter is getting some pushback from people like me who have an option. <br><br>Charter loses a lot more when a customer drops them than when a customer changes tiers - seems like they should notice when some customers have options, especially when a customer comes to their office and shows them those options (as I did).<br><br>With Uverse we upgraded the number of TV channels considerably but lowered the internet from 15/3 to 12/1.5 at a monthly total of $108. <br><br>Internet seems about the same, Vonage phone works better(clearer audio), TV has more channels, DVR is easier to use. So far we're happy -- time will tell if it was a good move but the cost difference made it hard to resist. We weren't unhappy with Charter's service, just the cost.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Been-awhile-since-Charter-increased-speeds-27930032</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jan 2013 14:17:16 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Been awhile since Charter increased speeds</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Been-awhile-since-Charter-increased-speeds-27928063</link>
<description><![CDATA[anon posted : <div class="bquote"><said>said by <a href="/profile/1571729" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1571729');">BlakePaulson</a>:</said><p>He's talking about over cell phone. </p></div>You're not getting it for $50. And they have extremely low caps and high overages.<br><br><div class="bquote"><p>The thing is that charter used to offer lower packages for a lower price, or contracts to keep things at a decent rate.</p></div>And Big Macs used to be a quarter.<br><br><div class="bquote"><p>Charter has the ability to offer lower bandwidth, for a lower price, and make more money than they currently make off of us at the $49.99 price (IE they can offer slower speeds, lower caps, and make good money.)</p></div>You have inside knowledge of Chater's finances? And unless you have a ton of Charter stock you don't have any skin in the game to say what "good money" is for Charter.<br><br><div class="bquote"><p>Instead they're losing customers who will pay ANYTHING less than $49.99 for internet because they don't care about speeds (IE grandma's, older folks.) They aren't going to pay $49.99 just to check the weather. If someone else has a lower price, even if it's just a few dollars cheaper, why pay that extra when they won't need it?<br><br>So instead of charter making some money on these types of customers by offering lower tiers, charter is making no money.</p></div>OK say by having a lower tier say $30 they gain 500,000 custoemrs, BUT 1 million go from 30 Meg to the lower tier.<br><br>500,000 X $30=$15 million<br>1,000,000 X-$20 =-$20 million<br><br>Charter LOSES $5 million.<br><br>Now even if you assume it's only 500,000 then Charter would gain $5 million. But that's gross income not NET. Charter's net income could be next to nothing. In other words not worth the hassel. Once again Charter has these numbers not me or you.<br><br><div class="bquote"><p>Kind of stupid when you think of how inexpensive it is to actually provide bandwidth. Maybe one day they'll get it.</p></div>If they are making more money the way they do it now it's not stupid. As I said if offering a lower tier is better financially they will do it. I'm not sure what is so hard to get. I guess we'll see when their quartely report comes out.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Been-awhile-since-Charter-increased-speeds-27928063</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jan 2013 16:07:14 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Been awhile since Charter increased speeds</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Been-awhile-since-Charter-increased-speeds-27927338</link>
<description><![CDATA[BlakePaulson posted : <div class="bquote"><said>said by anon anon :</said><p><div class="bquote"><said>said by <a href="/profile/532555" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=532555');">mmainprize</a>:</said><p>For that same $50 bucks you can get Phone and Data service over wireless. For the customer that want internet at home also a low price tier would be fine.</p></div>WHERE?<br> </p></div>He's talking about over cell phone. If I didn't watch so much netflix and hulu I wouldn't even need home internet because most of my usage is done on a phone anyway...<br><br>Yes, I can switch to centurylink and pay for 1.5 or 3 meg internet.<br><br>The thing is that charter used to offer lower packages for a lower price, or contracts to keep things at a decent rate.<br><br>Charter has the ability to offer lower bandwidth, for a lower price, and make more money than they currently make off of us at the $49.99 price (IE they can offer slower speeds, lower caps, and make good money.)<br><br>Instead they're losing customers who will pay ANYTHING less than $49.99 for internet because they don't care about speeds (IE grandma's, older folks.) They aren't going to pay $49.99 just to check the weather. If someone else has a lower price, even if it's just a few dollars cheaper, why pay that extra when they won't need it?<br><br>So instead of charter making some money on these types of customers by offering lower tiers, charter is making no money.<br><br>Kind of stupid when you think of how inexpensive it is to actually provide bandwidth. Maybe one day they'll get it.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Been-awhile-since-Charter-increased-speeds-27927338</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jan 2013 10:50:27 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Been awhile since Charter increased speeds</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Been-awhile-since-Charter-increased-speeds-27927161</link>
<description><![CDATA[anon posted : And it also states "The fee is not listed on Charter's site listing of fees, and users say it's often inconsistently applied." Again, this is not the fee you are thinking of.<br><br>Also the "change of service computerized fee" used to be named the "service restoration fee" which is where all this confusion is coming into play. Sadly that article is incorrect. Trust me on this, as someone on the inside at Charter, this isn't the $1.99 payment by phone fee everyone thinks it is.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Been-awhile-since-Charter-increased-speeds-27927161</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jan 2013 09:47:48 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Been awhile since Charter increased speeds</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Been-awhile-since-Charter-increased-speeds-27926946</link>
<description><![CDATA[anon posted : <div class="bquote"><said>said by <a href="/profile/532555" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=532555');">mmainprize</a>:</said><p>For that same $50 bucks you can get Phone and Data service over wireless. For the customer that want internet at home also a low price tier would be fine.</p></div>WHERE?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Been-awhile-since-Charter-increased-speeds-27926946</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jan 2013 06:54:44 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Been awhile since Charter increased speeds</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Been-awhile-since-Charter-increased-speeds-27926965</link>
<description><![CDATA[cork1958 posted : <div class="bquote"><said>said by orth :</said><p>The computerized service fee is if you don't pay your bill on time and your account has a pending order on it to shut your tv/internet service off and you call in, make a payment and the pending order is cancelled. Your account is automatically billed $2.99 for it. Other than that if you call in to make a change to your account and pay the bill otherwise, it's still $1.99. There's been a lot of confusion around that.<br> </p></div>No, that IS NOT how it works. That fee is for ANY AND EVERY change you make to your existing account.<br><br>"Charter is informing customers that a dubious fee will be getting slightly more dubious during 2013. As it stands, Charter automatically charges users a $1.99 "Service Computerized Fee" should customers make any changes to their service, be it to change programming packages, or downgrade/upgrade your broadband speeds. Users in our Charter forum note they're being informed the fee will now be jumping from $2 to $3 for every change."<br><br>&raquo;<A HREF="/shownews/Charter-Hikes-Service-Computerized-Fee-122597">Charter Hikes 'Service Computerized Fee'</A><br><small>--<br>The Firefox alternative.<br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://www.mozilla.org/projects/seamonkey/" >www.mozilla.org/projects/seamonkey/</A></small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Been-awhile-since-Charter-increased-speeds-27926965</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jan 2013 04:39:42 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Been awhile since Charter increased speeds</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Been-awhile-since-Charter-increased-speeds-27926254</link>
<description><![CDATA[mmainprize posted : <div class="bquote"><said>said by anon anon :</said><p><div class="bquote"><said>said by <a href="/profile/1571729" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1571729');">BlakePaulson</a>:</said><p>I think the average user would like to lower their bill.<br><br>I'm still on a promo until may so I've got 15/3 right now. Perfectly speedy, does everything I need, no caps (at least enforced) as our node doesn't appear to be oversold.<br><br>I don't care for 30/4 internet... I'd be happy with 10/2 or even 10/1 for $25 a month but 30/4 for $49.99 a month... c'mon<br><br>We all see it for what it is... a pure money grab. With the lower tiers people who didn't use the internet much were paying little amounts. Now people who barely use the internet are paying almost $50 a month just to have internet (not like there's any real competition around here.)<br><br>It's stupid but it is what it is I guess.<br> </p></div>Gee a business trying to make money. Shocking. Listen this is beating a dead horse. If offering a lower tier plan for $30 will make Charter more money they will do it. If they offer a $30 plan and half their 30 meg plan customers drop down to the lower plan then Cahrter LOSES money A LOT of money. WHY would a business do that? What is the inentive? You wouldn't do it if you owned a business now would you? Of course not.<br><br>As I said if a lower speed tier brings in more revenue then yeah it will be done. But you have to ask yourself, will it? Are enough for 3 Meg and 15 meg customers leaving that having a $30 plan brings them back and doesn't canibalize their 30 emg customer base? I can't answer that and neither can anyone posting here.<br><br>At the end of the day no company is obligated to do something just to be nice. Sounds harsh but it's the truth.<br><br>In my area at&t offers 1.5 Mbps for $28 or 3 Mbps for $33. So would a 2 Mbps tier for $30 satisfy you? I think not. Even though it's competitive with what at&t offers.<br> </p></div>We3ll you keep thinging that way while many customer drop internet altogether.<br> For that same $50 bucks you can get Phone and Data service over wireless. For the customer that want internet at home also a low price tier would be fine.<br><br>Your logic just proves his point of a money grab. ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Been-awhile-since-Charter-increased-speeds-27926254</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2013 21:04:42 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Been awhile since Charter increased speeds</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Been-awhile-since-Charter-increased-speeds-27926123</link>
<description><![CDATA[zed260 posted : <div class="bquote"><said>said by anon anon :</said><p><div class="bquote"><said>said by <a href="/profile/1813438" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1813438');">zed260</a>:</said><p>upstream channel bonding is active in most markets according to charter bissniss </p></div>Ok so why is the upstream light on our modems still green instead of blue?<br> </p></div>because its limited to business only <br><br>for what its wroth i bet charter launches internet tiers similer to current business ones soon <br><br>namely a 50/5 tier<br><br>will be added]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Been-awhile-since-Charter-increased-speeds-27926123</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2013 20:07:03 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Been awhile since Charter increased speeds</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Been-awhile-since-Charter-increased-speeds-27926104</link>
<description><![CDATA[anon posted : <div class="bquote"><said>said by <a href="/profile/1571729" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1571729');">BlakePaulson</a>:</said><p>I think the average user would like to lower their bill.<br><br>I'm still on a promo until may so I've got 15/3 right now. Perfectly speedy, does everything I need, no caps (at least enforced) as our node doesn't appear to be oversold.<br><br>I don't care for 30/4 internet... I'd be happy with 10/2 or even 10/1 for $25 a month but 30/4 for $49.99 a month... c'mon<br><br>We all see it for what it is... a pure money grab. With the lower tiers people who didn't use the internet much were paying little amounts. Now people who barely use the internet are paying almost $50 a month just to have internet (not like there's any real competition around here.)<br><br>It's stupid but it is what it is I guess.<br> </p></div>Gee a business trying to make money. Shocking. Listen this is beating a dead horse. If offering a lower tier plan for $30 will make Charter more money they will do it. If they offer a $30 plan and half their 30 meg plan customers drop down to the lower plan then Cahrter LOSES money A LOT of money. WHY would a business do that? What is the inentive? You wouldn't do it if you owned a business now would you? Of course not.<br><br>As I said if a lower speed tier brings in more revenue then yeah it will be done. But you have to ask yourself, will it? Are enough for 3 Meg and 15 meg customers leaving that having a $30 plan brings them back and doesn't canibalize their 30 emg customer base? I can't answer that and neither can anyone posting here.<br><br>At the end of the day no company is obligated to do something just to be nice. Sounds harsh but it's the truth.<br><br>In my area at&t offers 1.5 Mbps for $28 or 3 Mbps for $33. So would a 2 Mbps tier for $30 satisfy you? I think not. Even though it's competitive with what at&t offers.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Been-awhile-since-Charter-increased-speeds-27926104</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2013 20:03:37 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Been awhile since Charter increased speeds</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Been-awhile-since-Charter-increased-speeds-27925939</link>
<description><![CDATA[Dogg posted : <div class="bquote"><said>said by <a href="/profile/1571729" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1571729');">BlakePaulson</a>:</said><p>I think the average user would like to lower their bill.<br><br>I'm still on a promo until may so I've got 15/3 right now. Perfectly speedy, does everything I need, no caps (at least enforced) as our node doesn't appear to be oversold.<br><br>I don't care for 30/4 internet... I'd be happy with 10/2 or even 10/1 for $25 a month but 30/4 for $49.99 a month... c'mon<br><br>We all see it for what it is... a pure money grab. With the lower tiers people who didn't use the internet much were paying little amounts. Now people who barely use the internet are paying almost $50 a month just to have internet (not like there's any real competition around here.)<br><br>It's stupid but it is what it is I guess.<br> </p></div>And that's perfectly understandable.  But it doesn't apply to anyone that's interested in speed upgrades.<br><br>And those of us that do want more than 15/3, 30 or 100 is plenty fast for download, it's the upload that has a greater affect on everyone.<br><small>--<br>Google is your Friend</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Been-awhile-since-Charter-increased-speeds-27925939</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2013 18:55:05 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Been awhile since Charter increased speeds</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Been-awhile-since-Charter-increased-speeds-27924432</link>
<description><![CDATA[BlakePaulson posted : I think the average user would like to lower their bill.<br><br>I'm still on a promo until may so I've got 15/3 right now. Perfectly speedy, does everything I need, no caps (at least enforced) as our node doesn't appear to be oversold.<br><br>I don't care for 30/4 internet... I'd be happy with 10/2 or even 10/1 for $25 a month but 30/4 for $49.99 a month... c'mon<br><br>We all see it for what it is... a pure money grab. With the lower tiers people who didn't use the internet much were paying little amounts. Now people who barely use the internet are paying almost $50 a month just to have internet (not like there's any real competition around here.)<br><br>It's stupid but it is what it is I guess.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Been-awhile-since-Charter-increased-speeds-27924432</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2013 12:13:38 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Been awhile since Charter increased speeds</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Been-awhile-since-Charter-increased-speeds-27924020</link>
<description><![CDATA[Phatty posted : I don't think the average user cares about faster downstream. I feel like 20-30mb is a good number to be at, upstream should be increased and caps should either go away or be increased.   ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Been-awhile-since-Charter-increased-speeds-27924020</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2013 09:59:51 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
