site Search:


 
    All Forums Hot Topics Gallery






how-to block ads


 
Search Topic:
Uniqs:
403
Share Topic
Post a:
Post a:
page: 1 · 2
AuthorAll Replies


skeechan
Ai Otsukaholic
Premium
join:2012-01-26
AA169|170
kudos:2

No love for Cali

Oh well. Still better than AT&T.

E Man1864

join:2012-03-16
Sylvania, OH

They also hate Ohio too.



ilikeme
I live in a van down by the river.
Premium
join:2002-08-27
Denton, TX
kudos:1

reply to skeechan

said by skeechan:

Oh well. Still better than AT&T.

Right...... Sprint is terrible compared to At&t. I have used both and compared them.


skeechan
Ai Otsukaholic
Premium
join:2012-01-26
AA169|170
kudos:2

Me too and AT&T blows goat. Herpes is better than AT&T.


xenophon

join:2007-09-17

reply to ilikeme
Did you compare in active Sprint LTE market with LTE phone?



ilikeme
I live in a van down by the river.
Premium
join:2002-08-27
Denton, TX
kudos:1

reply to skeechan

said by skeechan:

Me too and AT&T blows goat. Herpes is better than AT&T.

If going by that analogy, then AIDS and cancer combined is better than Sprint.


ilikeme
I live in a van down by the river.
Premium
join:2002-08-27
Denton, TX
kudos:1

reply to xenophon

said by xenophon:

Did you compare in active Sprint LTE market with LTE phone?

Yup. Sprint LTE/WIMAX compared to AT&T LTE. Sprints coverage has more holes than swiss cheese.

xenophon

join:2007-09-17

Looks like Dallas area to be complete by Aug...

»s4gru.com/index.php?/topic/212-n···ng-list/



skeechan
Ai Otsukaholic
Premium
join:2012-01-26
AA169|170
kudos:2

reply to ilikeme
Which makes them WAY better than AT&T.



McShaken
Premium
join:2006-02-20
Olympia, WA

LOL! I almost spit my water out with that one.... Nice! And agreed.



ilikeme
I live in a van down by the river.
Premium
join:2002-08-27
Denton, TX
kudos:1

reply to skeechan
How? AT&T has pretty much solid coverage while sprint is useless in most places outside, but especially indoors and rural areas.



skeechan
Ai Otsukaholic
Premium
join:2012-01-26
AA169|170
kudos:2

$10/GB for data, no thanks. AT&T can take their rip off "coverage" suck it.



ilikeme
I live in a van down by the river.
Premium
join:2002-08-27
Denton, TX
kudos:1

What's the point in paying for unlimited data from Sprint if cant be used hardly anywhere? I would much rather pay more for data from AT&T and Verizon if I can actually use it. BTW, I still have unlimited data on AT&T.



skeechan
Ai Otsukaholic
Premium
join:2012-01-26
AA169|170
kudos:2
Reviews:
·Cox HSI
·Clear Wireless

1 edit

What is the point of coverage when you have to take out a mortgage to pay for it? BTW, you are grandfathered with unlimited for now but you actually want a tethering option or FaceTime and you have to drop it. And even with so-called unlimited if you use 3GB they traffic shape you into the ground with edge speeds making the service completely unusable. Oh and then there is the $20 for unlimited texting...joy. They dumped their cheaper texting options. I know, I was grandfathered with my old iP5 with AT&T and I had to drop my $5 texting plan if I upgraded through them (to keep it you had to upgrade through Apple daut kaum). With Sprint, unlimited means unlimited and I still get the tethering option and FaceTime unlike AT&T. AT&T even charges for their "Navigator" GPS option.

Meanwhile, here AT&T LTE is 5X5, not much faster than 3G. AT&T sucks...just like their wireline service, overpriced garbage.



ilikeme
I live in a van down by the river.
Premium
join:2002-08-27
Denton, TX
kudos:1

said by skeechan:

What is the point of coverage when you have to take out a mortgage to pay for it? BTW, you are grandfathered with unlimited for now but you actually want tethering or FaceTime and you have to drop it and if you use 3GB they traffic shape you into the ground with edge speeds making the service unusable. I know, I was grandfathered with my old iP5 with AT&T. With Sprint, unlimited means unlimited and I still have tethering and FaceTime unlike AT&T.

Meanwhile, here AT&T LTE is 5X5, not much faster than 3G.

I never use FaceTime anyways. I use about 4-5GB a month and have not had my speeds reduced. I routinely get 30-50Mbps on LTE and have seen it as high as 65. I can't say the same for when I tried Sprint. With them I rarely got about 10-15Mbps on LTE and WIMAX.. Generally it was about 1-3. I have a Verizon hotspot that I use for mobile broadband for my other devices which also gets about the same speeds as AT&T. Its a case of "you get what you pay for."
--

Fiber Optics is the future of high-speed internet access. Stop by the BBR Fiber Optic Forum


skeechan
Ai Otsukaholic
Premium
join:2012-01-26
AA169|170
kudos:2
Reviews:
·Cox HSI
·Clear Wireless

said by ilikeme:

Its a case of "you get what you pay for."

AT&T is a case of "you get to pay way more for".


ilikeme
I live in a van down by the river.
Premium
join:2002-08-27
Denton, TX
kudos:1

said by skeechan:

said by ilikeme:

Its a case of "you get what you pay for."

AT&T is a case of "you get to pay way more for".

Exactly! Better coverage and customer service!


skeechan
Ai Otsukaholic
Premium
join:2012-01-26
AA169|170
kudos:2

AT&T and customer service in the same sentence sans bad, LOL.



ilikeme
I live in a van down by the river.
Premium
join:2002-08-27
Denton, TX
kudos:1

said by skeechan:

AT&T and customer service in the same sentence sans bad, LOL.

I have never had a problem with AT&T or Verizon CS. Can't say the same about Sprint. Also, most reviews and ratings say sprint sucks.


skeechan
Ai Otsukaholic
Premium
join:2012-01-26
AA169|170
kudos:2

dp


Thursday, 23-May 01:59:17 Terms of Use & Privacy | feedback | contact | Hosting by nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo
over 13.5 years online © 1999-2013 dslreports.com.
Most commented news this week
Hot Topics