 ProtusMoseImmortal. Eternal.Premium
join:2001-10-03
Bellevue, NE
kudos:4 | reply to ekster
Re: [game] 12 Angry Mafia I'm not even supposed to be here today! |
|
|
|
| Bang Gavel |
|
 DrModemPremium
join:2006-10-19
USA
kudos:1 | Period: Jury Deliberation.
Jury Members can talk |
|
| im here.
Not a lot to go on. And I'm having trouble getting into this game 
I Wish I could be move involved. There were a few posts that I had questions on, let me see if I can find them after I'm done dealing with this idiot.
--
»Re: [game] Crazy Game - The Resurrection - Day 2
Corrupt Politician - tmodelt
You may privately message the rest of the mafia: ekster, Rook008 & Kristopher. You win with the mafia. |
|
| reply to Archivis
said by Archivis:This is my exact situation entirely. Do the mafia even know who each other are? I thought the teams were split 50/50. If so, how do we operate as teams if we don't even know who is on our team? I can understand the town not knowing, but the mafia probably doesn't know as well. If they did, 50/50 would be an extreme disadvantage.
I question why he referred to the town and the mafia as if he's a 3rd party...
--
»Re: [game] Crazy Game - The Resurrection - Day 2
Corrupt Politician - tmodelt
You may privately message the rest of the mafia: ekster, Rook008 & Kristopher. You win with the mafia. |
|
| reply to Jim
said by Jim:Irrelevant.
Please confine your comments to the case at hand.
Is Jim a lawyer? |
|
| reply to Jim
said by Jim:Because of the result coming in.
I fos'd Arch because he was logged in yet had not said a word. Then I got the result. Simple really.
What result?
--
»Re: [game] Crazy Game - The Resurrection - Day 2
Corrupt Politician - tmodelt
You may privately message the rest of the mafia: ekster, Rook008 & Kristopher. You win with the mafia. |
|
 JobbieKeep It SimplePremium
join:2010-08-24
Mexico
kudos:1 | reply to DrModem
For now i thin Protus is the highes on the list just because of Jim's claim |
|
JobbieKeep It SimplePremium
join:2010-08-24
Mexico
kudos:1 | I feel so lonely at this time in the game.
WTB more Krisnacharak. |
|
| It's Krisnakaroach, silly |
|
JobbieKeep It SimplePremium
join:2010-08-24
Mexico
kudos:1 | I think it was Krisnatadouche but oh well.
So hang Protus? yay or nay? |
|
| maybe. What about the inactives? |
|
JobbieKeep It SimplePremium
join:2010-08-24
Mexico
kudos:1 | You are probably right, I think tmodelt has been the most inactive. I would go for him too.
--
Judge a man by the trials of his shield, not the empty reaping of his sword. |
|
| I see Jim's post now about his deliberation or whatever.
I'd settle for PM as well to test Jim's claim. |
|
 KrisnatharokCaveat EmptorPremium
join:2009-02-11
Earth Orbit
kudos:7 | I'm here. I'm leaning for (against?) Jim since it would sound like mafia knows what's going on.
But I'd be ok with an inactive (not that I am the best role model in that area this game).
vote tmod
--
Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase a little Temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety. |
|
| You wouldn't see his role as something that could be related to a cop role? |
|
KrisnatharokCaveat EmptorPremium
join:2009-02-11
Earth Orbit
kudos:7 | He said it's not 100%, which sounds like the planned way out after we convict an innocent person.
In court, that's called hearsay, and if we had lawyers, the Defense would be telling us that such testimony can't be admitted.
--
Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase a little Temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety. |
|
| ok.
Vote: tmo |
|
JobbieKeep It SimplePremium
join:2010-08-24
Mexico
kudos:1 | Vote: tmodelt
I would say we need to look at Jim next. |
|
DrModemPremium
join:2006-10-19
USA
kudos:1 | Tmod was an innocent defendant
Period is now courtroom debate |
|
