<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Topic &#x27;DNS issues.&#x27; in forum &#x27;Comcast HSI&#x27; - dslreports.com</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/DNS-issues-27934766</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 04:36:27 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 04:36:27 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: DNS issues.</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-DNS-issues-27937580</link>
<description><![CDATA[bradyr posted : When I mentioned that comcast dns servers do ICMP rate limiting, that means that they may not respond to ping requests and may also show timeout blips on traceroutes.<br><br>again,  try using dig or nslookup to verify if you are having DNS issues.   <br><br>traceroute and ping blips to 75.75.75.75 or 75.75.76.76 prove absolutely nothing due to their ICMP rate limiting.   I will get the same "packet loss" that you do and I can guarantee you that my internet connection is having zero issues.<br><br>Edit:  In case anyone was wondering what a typical dig response at 75.75.75.75 would look like:<br><br><pre class="brush: text">ryan@skynet:~$ dig @75.75.75.75 google.com&#012; &#012;; &lt;&lt;&gt;&gt; DiG 9.8.1-P1 &lt;&lt;&gt;&gt; @75.75.75.75 google.com&#012;; (1 server found)&#012;;; global options: +cmd&#012;;; Got answer:&#012;;; -&gt;&gt;HEADER&lt;&lt;- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 10620&#012;;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 11, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 0&#012; &#012;;; QUESTION SECTION:&#012;;google.com.                    IN      A&#012; &#012;;; ANSWER SECTION:&#012;google.com.             211     IN      A       74.125.224.39&#012;google.com.             211     IN      A       74.125.224.37&#012;google.com.             211     IN      A       74.125.224.32&#012;google.com.             211     IN      A       74.125.224.34&#012;google.com.             211     IN      A       74.125.224.33&#012;google.com.             211     IN      A       74.125.224.46&#012;google.com.             211     IN      A       74.125.224.41&#012;google.com.             211     IN      A       74.125.224.36&#012;google.com.             211     IN      A       74.125.224.40&#012;google.com.             211     IN      A       74.125.224.35&#012;google.com.             211     IN      A       74.125.224.38&#012; &#012;;; Query time: 19 msec&#012;;; SERVER: 75.75.75.75#53(75.75.75.75)&#012;;; WHEN: Tue Jan 22 17:16:18 2013&#012;;; MSG SIZE  rcvd: 204&#012; &#012;</pre><!--end code block--><br>and here's a nslookup against 75.75.75.75:<br><br><pre class="brush: text">ryan@skynet:~$ nslookup google.com 75.75.75.75&#012;Server:         75.75.75.75&#012;Address:        75.75.75.75#53&#012; &#012;Non-authoritative answer:&#012;Name:   google.com&#012;Address: 74.125.224.39&#012;Name:   google.com&#012;Address: 74.125.224.37&#012;Name:   google.com&#012;Address: 74.125.224.32&#012;Name:   google.com&#012;Address: 74.125.224.34&#012;Name:   google.com&#012;Address: 74.125.224.33&#012;Name:   google.com&#012;Address: 74.125.224.46&#012;Name:   google.com&#012;Address: 74.125.224.41&#012;Name:   google.com&#012;Address: 74.125.224.36&#012;Name:   google.com&#012;Address: 74.125.224.40&#012;Name:   google.com&#012;Address: 74.125.224.35&#012;Name:   google.com&#012;Address: 74.125.224.38&#012; &#012;</pre><!--end code block-->]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-DNS-issues-27937580</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2013 20:06:18 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: DNS issues.</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-DNS-issues-27937579</link>
<description><![CDATA[pflog posted : <div class="bquote"><said>said by <a href="/profile/967531" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=967531');">thataboi</a>:</said><p>Typical dslreports critcism. Well did you use a dsnlookup tool?? Wow really? What is a dsntool going to tell me that I don't already know hen I am sitting in front of a screen with half the internet loading text?? So I did a simple tracert to the server as this was happening and it ended with packet loss. So are you going to insult me some more?<br><br>8    14 ms    *    15 ms  cdns01.comcast.net [75.75.75.75]<br> </p></div>latency (typically gauged by a ping or traceroute) to a server that rate limits or drops ICMP and even udp traceroute packets is not a good way to check the response time of a DNS server.<br><br>The actual time it takes for a response is:<br><br>RTT (latency)<br>+<br>Lookup time (which may involve querying authoritative servers, or doing a recursive lookup, etc)<br><br>So even if a DNS server didn't rate limit ICMP, ping alone will <b>not</b> tell you the whole story.<br><small>--<br>"I drank what?" -Socrates</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-DNS-issues-27937579</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2013 20:06:14 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: DNS issues.</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-DNS-issues-27937556</link>
<description><![CDATA[thataboi posted : Typical dslreports critcism. Well did you use a dsnlookup tool?? Wow really? What is a dsntool going to tell me that I don't already know hen I am sitting in front of a screen with half the internet loading text?? So I did a simple tracert to the server as this was happening and it ended with packet loss. So are you going to insult me some more?<br><br>8    14 ms    *    15 ms  cdns01.comcast.net [75.75.75.75]]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-DNS-issues-27937556</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2013 19:56:37 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: DNS issues.</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-DNS-issues-27936927</link>
<description><![CDATA[egeek84 posted : LOL!!!!!!!]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-DNS-issues-27936927</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2013 16:38:14 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: DNS issues.</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-DNS-issues-27936317</link>
<description><![CDATA[JigglyWiggly posted : If you want to test dns<br>use dnsbenchmark<br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://www.grc.com/dns/benchmark.htm" >www.grc.com/dns/benchmark.htm</A>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-DNS-issues-27936317</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2013 13:58:11 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: DNS issues.</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-DNS-issues-27935130</link>
<description><![CDATA[jlivingood posted : <div class="bquote"><said>said by <a href="/profile/1591941" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1591941');">bradyr</a>:</said><p>Delayed ninja edit:  Comcast most likely rate-limits ICMP packets on their dns servers.   ping and traceroute are not the best way to judge DNS server performance.  use tools like nslookup and dig to see how your dns performance is.</p></div>In response to the delayed ninja edit... Ninja bonus points for correctness and style. Bonus 2 throwing stars.<br><br><small>--<br>JL<br>Comcast</small><div class="borderless"><TABLE WIDTH=95% align=center border=0 CELLPADDING=4"><TR><TD ALIGN=CENTER VALIGN=CENTER BGCOLOR=#FFFFFF nwrap COLSPAN=2 WIDTH=66%><A HREF="/speak/slideshow/27935130?c=2068564&ret=L2ZvcnVtL3IyNzkzNDc2Ni54bWw%3D"><IMG TITLE="267077 bytes" BORDER=0 WIDTH=328 HEIGHT=272 SRC="/r0/download/2068564~09311d431d25b02ba4e56f5c9df37b6b/bitdance.gif"></A></TD></TABLE></div>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-DNS-issues-27935130</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2013 08:26:58 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: DNS issues.</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-DNS-issues-27934981</link>
<description><![CDATA[RR Conductor posted : I haven't seen any problems up here in Northwestern California (Mendocino County).<br><small>--<br><br></small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-DNS-issues-27934981</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2013 06:34:56 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: DNS issues.</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-DNS-issues-27934780</link>
<description><![CDATA[bradyr posted : 75.75.75.75 and 75.75.76.76 crappy?  just because they aren't responding to pings means they are crappy, I forward to 75.75.75.75 since i'm on the west coast and i've had zero problems with DNS resolution.  very snappy on every lookup.<br><br>Delayed ninja edit:  Comcast most likely rate-limits ICMP packets on their dns servers.   ping and traceroute are not the best way to judge DNS server performance.  use tools like nslookup and dig to see how your dns performance is.   I choose comcast's servers because they are only a couple hops from me and they perform lookups just as fast as google's dns servers.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-DNS-issues-27934780</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2013 00:29:12 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>DNS issues.</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/DNS-issues-27934766</link>
<description><![CDATA[thataboi posted : Anyone else out West coast having Comcast DNS issues? Sometimes regular common websites such as google.com won't even load or load only text. I then run tracert and pings etc and find that 75.75.75.75 and 75.75.76.76 I are having packet loss. Anybody know of other dns servers out here we can use besides these two crappy ones and without compromising dnssec??]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/DNS-issues-27934766</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2013 00:20:56 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
