<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Topic &#x27;LigoWave PRO series&#x27; in forum &#x27;Wireless Service Providers&#x27; - dslreports.com</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/LigoWave-PRO-series-27935700</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 01:58:08 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 01:58:08 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: LigoWave PRO series</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-LigoWave-PRO-series-27943102</link>
<description><![CDATA[gunther_01 posted : I take it you don't graph and such...? It would be nice just to have a rough estimate on speeds along with ping times..<br><br>I did get my email back. No 5.4 as of yet, with no ETA.<br><small>--<br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://www.wirelessdatanet.net" >www.wirelessdatanet.net</A></small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-LigoWave-PRO-series-27943102</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2013 12:44:06 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: LigoWave PRO series</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-LigoWave-PRO-series-27942679</link>
<description><![CDATA[Chessie posted : My link is around 10 miles. Ping times were great from what I remember at the time of install but to be perfectly honest I don't have much data on this link. It was late winter early spring and I was having issues with the backhaul in place. I ordered a link did the climbs and set it and forgot it that was two years ago. I have around 80 subs on the tower it ties into the main tower. Those subs are a mix of 1.5 and 3meg customers so its a heavy use tower. <br><br>Wish I had more info for you. ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-LigoWave-PRO-series-27942679</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2013 10:37:42 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: LigoWave PRO series</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-LigoWave-PRO-series-27939410</link>
<description><![CDATA[gunther_01 posted : Called Ligo after not getting a sales email response.<br><br>They have 'plans' but essentially nothing in the immediate works by the sounds of it.<br><br>So stuck with 5.8 on those "legally" for now, and (what I would say), the foreseeable future.<br><small>--<br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://www.wirelessdatanet.net" >www.wirelessdatanet.net</A></small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-LigoWave-PRO-series-27939410</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2013 11:50:36 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: LigoWave PRO series</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-LigoWave-PRO-series-27936444</link>
<description><![CDATA[jcremin posted : <div class="bquote"><said>said by <a href="/profile/979565" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=979565');">gunther_01</a>:</said><p>My friend said this about them <br>"On a 50km link I am seeing 2-4ms running 50/20 megs down/up have tested to 100/100 and latency holds same" </p></div>Nice.  I don't need the sub 1ms pings that licensed links provide, but right now it's the jitter that gets me once my links are under a load.  I'd settle for a stable 5ms ping with traffic over a an average of 2 ms with a bunch that jump up randomly.<br><br><div class="bquote"><said>said by <a href="/profile/979565" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=979565');">gunther_01</a>:</said><p>I may just have to bite the bullet and buy a pair to check them out..  </p></div>I was thinking about doing that this summer on my 36 mile backup link.  It's too cold and money is too tight to gamble with it right now.  :)<br><br><div class="bquote"><said>said by <a href="/profile/979565" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=979565');">gunther_01</a>:</said><p>The only issue I see is they aren't 5.4 cert'ed, so 5.8 only. I do have an email in to Ligo to see if they are planning on doing any thing about that, but no response yet. </p></div>I saw someone had said something about being able to request a special firmware for the lower 5ghz bands.  It would be interesting to see what they tell you.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-LigoWave-PRO-series-27936444</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2013 14:30:35 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: LigoWave PRO series</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-LigoWave-PRO-series-27935918</link>
<description><![CDATA[gunther_01 posted : My friend said this about them <br>"On a 50km link I am seeing 2-4ms running 50/20 megs down/up have tested to 100/100 and latency holds same"<br><br>And that is what really sparked my interest. But of course I don't have any to verify, but I do trust him. He also said they are putting up quite a few more of them instead of UBNT which he had been using.<br><br>I may just have to bite the bullet and buy a pair to check them out.. The only issue I see is they aren't 5.4 cert'ed, so 5.8 only. I do have an email in to Ligo to see if they are planning on doing any thing about that, but no response yet.<br><br>I'm NOT advocating them, I'd just like to learn more about them from others in real world testing is all.<br><small>--<br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://www.wirelessdatanet.net" >www.wirelessdatanet.net</A></small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-LigoWave-PRO-series-27935918</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2013 12:15:47 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: LigoWave PRO series</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-LigoWave-PRO-series-27935891</link>
<description><![CDATA[jcremin posted : <div class="bquote"><said>said by <a href="/profile/1781561" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1781561');">Chessie</a>:</said><p>I have one of my most critical backhaul links using one. I put it up two years ago and have not touched it or thought about it since. </p></div>How long is the link?  Also, how much traffic is typically going over it and what kind of ping times do you average across it?<br><br>I have some backhauls that I need to get to be a bit more stable and I've been seriously considering these to get the job done.  I did some searching on this and a few other forums and found a few people using them and nobody seemed to have any major complaints.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-LigoWave-PRO-series-27935891</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2013 12:08:25 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: LigoWave PRO series</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-LigoWave-PRO-series-27935873</link>
<description><![CDATA[gunther_01 posted : About $1400 a link give or take.<br>But if it can do 100Meg and do it with sub 10ms pings, that's what I am after. I can't handle the latency and jitter I am seeing with UBNT anymore.<br>I know some have great luck with them Etc. I see high jitter, mainly because of the interference we have in our areas I believe.<br><small>--<br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://www.wirelessdatanet.net" >www.wirelessdatanet.net</A></small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-LigoWave-PRO-series-27935873</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2013 12:04:29 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: LigoWave PRO series</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-LigoWave-PRO-series-27935833</link>
<description><![CDATA[treichhart posted : how much is the cost of these?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-LigoWave-PRO-series-27935833</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2013 11:56:08 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: LigoWave PRO series</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-LigoWave-PRO-series-27935752</link>
<description><![CDATA[Chessie posted : I have one of my most critical backhaul links using one. I put it up two years ago and have not touched it or thought about it since. So in that one case I have used one I love it. I have several new backhaul projects coming up soon. I certainly am going to be considering them cost is the only down side I see. ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-LigoWave-PRO-series-27935752</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2013 11:36:26 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>LigoWave PRO series</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/LigoWave-PRO-series-27935700</link>
<description><![CDATA[gunther_01 posted : Anyone using these and care to want to share? I have at least one friend who seems to love them.<br><br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://www.ligowave.com/ligoptp-5-23-pro" >www.ligowave.com/ligoptp-5-23-pro</A><br><small>--<br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://www.wirelessdatanet.net" >www.wirelessdatanet.net</A></small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/LigoWave-PRO-series-27935700</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2013 11:24:31 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
