reply to kevinds
Re: Shaw no support new Super HD from Netflix, boo! Kevin,
My point is that peering and transit are both inexpensive when compared to the last mile. Connecting in Internet exchanges on "cheap" routers/switches and pushing data fast doesn't cost insanely huge coin like folks are suggesting, definitely not enough to cause a large company to take this deal. Pipes from CMTS and DSLAM to home cost more, and push far less Mbps. The last mile is also usually what would determine the quality of a users connection.
I agree with that. Last mile is the hardest to deal with when dealing with capacity issues.
This is about Netflix wanting to save money by not having to pay for transit their CDN uses, blocking content from ISP's users because they won't peer or pay for a few racks of hardware. 1/4 rack will not be enough equipment for pushing out say 30% of an ISPs traffic.
Yes, I am not employed and looking for IT work. Have passport, will travel.
and its just a coincidence that the all the cable companies have an issues with netflix and the superhd?