 JohnInSJPremium join:2003-09-22 San Jose, CA Reviews:
·PHONE POWER
·Comcast
| reply to johnnn
Re: [Speed] Congested Comcast Peering with Akamai, Google in Mid said by johnnn:various observations But there is no way to verify your observations.
Let's start with some actual facts
- what tier are you on
- what is your home network like
- what load are you putting on your connection (are you uploading while attempting these downloads, for example? I don't care what you're uploading - just tell me if you're using x% of your uplink... do you have 1, 2, 5, 20 devices sharing the connection? Are any of THEM uploading, or downloading at the same time? Can you disconnect everything from the network except one test machine and try to reproduce the problem? Did you verify the machine being used to test is free of malware and rootkits?)
- what devices are you attempting to render HD content streams on, and are those devices themselves having performance issues
- what are your modem signals when you are having these issues?
Comcast has many millions of users. If they were having regular widespread CDN peering issues, we'd see millions of users complaining about it.
Your problem might be one of local congestion on your connection, or even a signal/drop issue. Jumping directly to a local node, neighborhood, or CDN peering congestion issue seems to be sidestepping much more likely problems -- My place : »www.schettino.us |
|
 johnnn join:2007-01-25 Ypsilanti, MI | Thanks, JohnInSJ, here goes:
-Blast (25/4) -I have a Motorola SB 6121; 4 downstream, 3 upstream channels bonded. -I have all cat5e cable between devices (modem-router, router-computers). The router is a TP-Link TL-WR2543ND with 4 gigabit ports. -I am not loading the connection when I perform tests -I have run tests with multiple computers hooked directly to the modem -I have had two tech visits to verify good line quality (both found a very stable plant/no issues using their JDSU equipment) -All of my computers are free of malware and experience little/no resource contention during testing. I have tested on Windows 7, Windows 8, Ubuntu 12.04. -I have asked pointed questions about congestion in my area in Comcast Direct ("can you confirm there is congestion between endpoints in my area and certain peering/transit links?") and received nonspecific answers which refrain from disconfirming. |
|
 JohnInSJPremium join:2003-09-22 San Jose, CA Reviews:
·PHONE POWER
·Comcast
| I assume when the techs visited (as in when they were there testing your line/modem signals) you were NOT seeing the issue?
Comcast doesn't generally have congestion issues anywhere, in the modern era. This is is why I would think this is something other than congestion - if its intermittent, does it vary in time of day, day of week? -- My place : »www.schettino.us |
|
 NetFixerFrom my cold dead handsPremium join:2004-06-24 The Boro Reviews:
·Comcast Business..
·Vonage
·Cingular Wireless
·Comcast
| reply to johnnn I am not going to try to convince you that you are not seeing problems with some sites/services, but what you seem to expect Comcast to do is not going to happen for a residential or small business customer; they are only going to look at the results for the majority of similar customers.
The only way you are going to get any ISP to even bother to look at transit problems that are outside their network (especially if most of their other customers are not seeing/reporting the same problem) is if you are an Enterprise level customer (such as a customer with multiple Metro Ethernet or DS3 connections paying at least 5 digit amounts each month for service).
Sorry, but that is just the way that the industry works. -- A well-regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.
When governments fear people, there is liberty. When the people fear the government, there is tyranny. |
|
 johnnn join:2007-01-25 Ypsilanti, MI | reply to JohnInSJ Both visited during the day on weekdays. They didn't perform tests past basic speedtests to the Comcast server near Detroit. The throughput problem is definitely exacerbated during peak times. Recently it was so bad I couldn't stream a 360p YouTube video from beginning to end without pauses (in video info, stream fluctuates between 200-900kbps).
The reason I believe congestion (at some level) to be the issue is this: I could close the page, retry, get the same poor performance, but then run a shaperprobe and get 36mbps down (shaped to 25mbps after Powerboost tokens spent) from whichever servers host the Shaperprobe test files.
NetFixer, I agree with your assessment. |
|
 JohnInSJPremium join:2003-09-22 San Jose, CA Reviews:
·PHONE POWER
·Comcast
| said by johnnn:Both visited during the day on weekdays. They didn't perform tests past basic speedtests to the Comcast server near Detroit. The throughput problem is definitely exacerbated during peak times. Recently it was so bad I couldn't stream a 360p YouTube video from beginning to end without pauses (in video info, stream fluctuates between 200-900kbps).
The reason I believe congestion (at some level) to be the issue is this: I could close the page, retry, get the same poor performance, but then run a shaperprobe and get 36mbps down (shaped to 25mbps after Powerboost tokens spent) from whichever servers host the Shaperprobe test files.
NetFixer, I agree with your assessment. Are you using Comcast DNS or some other DNS? It's possible you're not getting content from the closest CDN connection point if you're using a non-comcast DNS. -- My place : »www.schettino.us |
|
 | reply to johnnn Is your router capable of IPv6? If so try disabling that capability. I have a netgear router that was in auto mode, and was in 6to4 tunnel mode. Caused my streaming of netflix and youtube to be terrible. |
|
 johnnn join:2007-01-25 Ypsilanti, MI | reply to JohnInSJ I'm using anycast (75.75.75.75), and my router doesn't support IPv6. |
|
 | It may be that your local router is being upgraded... in your first post Hop 3 indicated a 'te' interface.
When I just tracerouted to it now, it's showing as a 'xe' interface.
3 20 ms 10 ms 10 ms 96.120.41.137
4 12 ms 7 ms 7 ms xe-8-2-0-sur01.grandrapids.mi.michigan.comcast.net [68.86.140.185]
5 17 ms 19 ms 27 ms te-0-2-0-4-ar01.taylor.mi.michigan.comcast.net [69.139.254.29]
6 18 ms 17 ms 19 ms xe-7-3-0-sur01.wannarbor.mi.michigan.comcast.net [68.85.218.201]
|
|
 DrDrewSo that others may surf. join:2009-01-28 SoCal kudos:8 | said by depster:It may be that your local router is being upgraded... in your first post Hop 3 indicated a 'te' interface.
When I just tracerouted to it now, it's showing as a 'xe' interface.
3 20 ms 10 ms 10 ms 96.120.41.137
4 12 ms 7 ms 7 ms xe-8-2-0-sur01.grandrapids.mi.michigan.comcast.net [68.86.140.185]
5 17 ms 19 ms 27 ms te-0-2-0-4-ar01.taylor.mi.michigan.comcast.net [69.139.254.29]
6 18 ms 17 ms 19 ms xe-7-3-0-sur01.wannarbor.mi.michigan.comcast.net [68.85.218.201]
It's a different interface of the same router. OP's being from the edge of the network inbound, yours being from the core of the network outbound. -- Two is one, one is none. If it's important, back it up... Somethimes 99.999% availability isn't even good enough. |
|
 johnnn join:2007-01-25 Ypsilanti, MI | DrDrew is right. When I do tracerts *to* the edge they travel through an xe interface. |
|
 JohnInSJPremium join:2003-09-22 San Jose, CA Reviews:
·PHONE POWER
·Comcast
| reply to johnnn said by johnnn:I'm using anycast (75.75.75.75), and my router doesn't support IPv6. Try using comcast's DNS. Just for grins. -- My place : »www.schettino.us |
|
 EGThe wings of lovePremium join:2006-11-18 Union, NJ kudos:9 1 edit | reply to depster FWIW, just a point. As Dr.Drew stated, it's the same physical router. This data needs to also be examined when evaluating the rDNS info on hops;
te-8-2-ur02 xe-7-0-sur01
Even though the IP address is the same, the slot, port, and ring data is different.
Some examples of some meanings;
Some examples;
ge = gigabit ethernet.
te / xe= ten gigabit ethernet.
p, po, pos = Packet Over Sonet (an OC-3 or faster connection).
XE / TE = Juniper / Cisco 10GigE Interface be / ae = Cisco Bundle Ethernet / Juniper Aggregate Ethernet
he = hundred gigabit ethernet.
1-1, 1-2, 1-11, 6-1, 9-1, 2-2, etc. = slot and port.
ar01, cr01, ur01
User Ring (UR), Area Ring (AR), Core Ring (CR) routing. |
|
|
|
 johnnn join:2007-01-25 Ypsilanti, MI | EG, you're the best. |
|
 EGThe wings of lovePremium join:2006-11-18 Union, NJ kudos:9 | I doubt that but thanks for your kind words !  |
|
 | reply to JohnInSJ That is Comcast's anycast DNS |
|
 whfsdudePremium join:2003-04-05 Washington, DC Reviews:
·T-Mobile US
| reply to EG said by EG:User Ring (UR), Area Ring (AR), Core Ring (CR) routing. The one I've never understood is "SUR." I have yet to see this interface name used outside of Comcast. Happen to know? |
|
 johnnn join:2007-01-25 Ypsilanti, MI |  New interface on the |  KS route |  CA route |  Peak time comparison |
There appear to be significant changes underway. One of the routers hostnames has reappeared, and I'm on a different interface. A hop prior to Pontiac has been eliminated from the previous configuration.
There was likely some sort of maintenance window on Friday morning as evidenced by the smokeping graphs attached (this makes sense, as it corresponds with the lowest utilization period for the college town I'm in). Comparing the ICMP performance for peak windows between this week and last, there's been a significant improvement. |
|
 JohnInSJPremium join:2003-09-22 San Jose, CA Reviews:
·PHONE POWER
·Comcast
| reply to nate1234 said by nate1234:That is Comcast's anycast DNS Perhaps using one from here »www.whatsmydns.net/dns/usa/comcast.html
Michigan
Primary DNS: 68.87.77.130
Secondary DNS: 68.87.72.130
Primary IPv6 DNS: 2001:558:1016:C:68:87:77:130
Secondary IPv6 DNS: 2001:558:100E:4:68:87:72:130
Would yield different CDN entry points? -- My place : »www.schettino.us |
|
 FBGuyPremium join:2005-03-19 Evanston, IL Reviews:
·Comcast
·T-Mobile US
| reply to EG said by EG:ge = gigabit ethernet.
te / xe= ten gigabit ethernet.
p, po, pos = Packet Over Sonet (an OC-3 or faster connection).
XE / TE = Juniper / Cisco 10GigE Interface be / ae = Cisco Bundle Ethernet / Juniper Aggregate Ethernet
he = hundred gigabit ethernet.
1-1, 1-2, 1-11, 6-1, 9-1, 2-2, etc. = slot and port.
ar01, cr01, ur01
User Ring (UR), Area Ring (AR), Core Ring (CR) routing. holy cow man. Thanks for this information. I know it's pretty trivial for non-comcast network engineers, but it really helps add some light into where my packets go when they leave town.  |
|