<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Topic &#x27;It&#x27;s a start.&#x27; in forum &#x27;&#x27; - dslreports.com</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Its-a-start-27943872</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 03:25:58 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 03:25:58 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: It&#x27;s a start.</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Its-a-start-27945046</link>
<description><![CDATA[Joe12345678 posted : Disney used to be a pay channel and if it's plan &raquo;<A HREF="http://usatoday30.usatoday.com/money/advertising/story/2012-06-05/disney-advertising-to-kids/55385470/1" >usatoday30.usatoday.com/money/ad&middot;&middot;&middot;385470/1</A><br><br>then they should go full ad free like hbo (where then still have there own ad's that they have FULL control over)]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Its-a-start-27945046</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2013 22:55:27 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>It&#x27;s a start.</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Its-a-start-27943872</link>
<description><![CDATA[tshirt posted :  I certainly don't need or want a sports network, particularly a VERY expensive sports ONLY network in any package I would consider.<br> Allowing users to opt out of that (and charge a lot more to those that opt in) would be fine with me.<br><br>Next step would be to separate  the Disney, nick etc (kids channels) as another add-on package.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Its-a-start-27943872</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2013 16:43:52 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
