<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Topic &#x27;Cisco/linksys was akin to sprint/nexhell&#x27; in forum &#x27;&#x27; - dslreports.com</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Ciscolinksys-was-akin-to-sprintnexhell-27946453</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 01:41:51 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 01:41:51 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: Cisco/linksys was akin to sprint/nexhell</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Ciscolinksys-was-akin-to-sprintnexhell-27946773</link>
<description><![CDATA[Kearnstd posted : I never understood why Cisco ever bought Linksys at all to begin with.  The two companies never clashed markets except at the very low end of small business(where mom&pop operations usually just ran consumer grade equipment.)<br><small>--<br>[65 Arcanist]Filan(High Elf) Zone: Broadband Reports</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Ciscolinksys-was-akin-to-sprintnexhell-27946773</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2013 13:28:52 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Cisco/linksys was akin to sprint/nexhell</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Ciscolinksys-was-akin-to-sprintnexhell-27946453</link>
<description><![CDATA[TuxRaiderPen posted : Totally different product lines and corporate mentality... <br><br>As another poster pointed out the x-Sipura VOIP systems, would seem to be a better match at Cisco, but again the culture clash is an issue.. <br><br>So are they in the consumer side and headed to crapkin? <br><small>--<br>1311393600 - Back to Black.....Black....Black....</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Ciscolinksys-was-akin-to-sprintnexhell-27946453</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2013 12:05:25 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
