| Ashton Kutcher to play role of Steve Jobs in upcoming movie »www.afterdawn.com/news/article.c···20130125
That will be interesting to see for sure!
--
»A pretty good alernative to bit torrent and newsgroups |
|
 skeechanAi OtsukaholicPremium
join:2012-01-26
AA169|170
kudos:2
 ·Cox HSI
 ·Clear Wireless
| Woz already commented from the clip recently released that Kutcher is playing it all wrong; the wardrobe is wrong too.
If I was making a movie like that, the first person I would talk about about these details would be Woz given he was there for those conversations. |
|
|
|
 M A R SPremium
join:2001-06-15
Long Island | reply to fonzbear2000
Huge FAIL |
|
 MikePremium,Mod
join:2000-09-17
Pittsburgh, PA
kudos:1 | reply to fonzbear2000
See. All first new Apple releases suck.
Second revision is better. |
|
 AlcoholPremium
join:2003-05-26
Climax, MI
kudos:3 | reply to fonzbear2000
They could have had a much better cast. Potential ruined.
--
I found the key to success but somebody changed the lock. |
|
 SnakeoilIgnore Button. The coward's feature.Premium
join:2000-08-05
Mentor, OH
kudos:1 | reply to fonzbear2000
Bummer they didn't ask Noah Wyle to reprise the role. |
|
skeechanAi OtsukaholicPremium
join:2012-01-26
AA169|170
kudos:2 | reply to Alcohol
Kutcher isn't an actor. In every role he is the same guy. He more like a news anchor that reads a teleprompter. |
|
 not quite rightI'm not cool enough to be a Mac person
join:2001-06-23
Puyallup, WA
kudos:1
 ·Vonage
·Comcast
| reply to skeechan
said by skeechan:Woz already commented from the clip recently released that Kutcher is playing it all wrong; the wardrobe is wrong too.
If I was making a movie like that, the first person I would talk about about these details would be Woz given he was there for those conversations.
Facts make boring movies, movies are for entertainment. Documentaries are for facts, and usually are boring.
--
Not many people know this, but I happen to be quite famous... |
|
skeechanAi OtsukaholicPremium
join:2012-01-26
AA169|170
kudos:2 | Except this story is compelling without having to sensationalize it. |
|
SnakeoilIgnore Button. The coward's feature.Premium
join:2000-08-05
Mentor, OH
kudos:1 Reviews:
·RoadRunner Cable
·magicjack.com
| said by skeechan:Except this story is compelling without having to sensationalize it.
Only to "fan" and geeks, not everyone else.
Kutcher maybe able to put asses in the seats VS someone who looks more like Jobs.
Kinda like How Cruise was paid to play the role of a 6'5" 250 pound man, in the movie Reacher. Sure they could have used the Rock, but they may have felt Cruise has more draw power.
I won't pay to see a movie about Apple, nor would I about Microsoft.
I'd rather watch a movie about how the discovery/research that led to the making of vacuum tubes and transistors. To me that would be more interesting.
Anyone that has an eye for art can design good looking hardware. As long as he listens to the input from the engineers that have to make the "pleasing" design to hold the electronics.
But to be they guy that could take two compounds and combine them so they form a transistor, then reduce them them so you could fit millions on a small package, now that's interesting.
But then again, I don't see how compelling a story about the start of the modern electronic components would be to anyone that wasn't into the actual soldering/repairing of the devices.
--
Is a person a failure for doing nothing? Or is he a failure for trying, and not succeeding at what he is attempting to do? What did you fail at today?. |
|
skeechanAi OtsukaholicPremium
join:2012-01-26
AA169|170
kudos:2 Reviews:
·Cox HSI
·Clear Wireless
1 edit | The name "Jobs" will put asses in the seats just as it sold books.
If anything, the name Kutcher just makes it appear campy. |
|
 JackarinoPremium
join:2006-12-28
Allendale, NJ
kudos:1 | reply to fonzbear2000
Should be an interesting one to say the least
--
Romney - Ryan 2012
Christie 2016 |
|
SnakeoilIgnore Button. The coward's feature.Premium
join:2000-08-05
Mentor, OH
kudos:1 Reviews:
·RoadRunner Cable
·magicjack.com
| reply to skeechan
That's the sad part. That a movie like that would get people to watch it.
I wonder if they will camp out for days before the movie is released?
But then again, why would they go to a theater, after all the theater isn't using Iscreens or Iprojectors, nor do they employee Apple geniuses.
--
Is a person a failure for doing nothing? Or is he a failure for trying, and not succeeding at what he is attempting to do? What did you fail at today?. |
|
skeechanAi OtsukaholicPremium
join:2012-01-26
AA169|170
kudos:2 | Nice troll. |
|
 NezmoThe name's Bond. James Bond.Premium,MVM
join:2004-11-10
Coppell, TX
kudos:1 | reply to fonzbear2000
Given the amount of Jobs idolization out there they could probably have Bernie Madoff play the lead and still have people camped out to see it.
I for one will give it a miss.
--
My Gallery
Formerly Nezmo  |
|
Reviews:
·Charter
| reply to Snakeoil
said by Snakeoil:said by skeechan:Except this story is compelling without having to sensationalize it.
Only to "fan" and geeks, not everyone else. Kutcher maybe able to put asses in the seats VS someone who looks more like Jobs. Kinda like How Cruise was paid to play the role of a 6'5" 250 pound man, in the movie Reacher. Sure they could have used the Rock, but they may have felt Cruise has more draw power. I won't pay to see a movie about Apple, nor would I about Microsoft. I'd rather watch a movie about how the discovery/research that led to the making of vacuum tubes and transistors. To me that would be more interesting. Anyone that has an eye for art can design good looking hardware. As long as he listens to the input from the engineers that have to make the "pleasing" design to hold the electronics. But to be they guy that could take two compounds and combine them so they form a transistor, then reduce them them so you could fit millions on a small package, now that's interesting. But then again, I don't see how compelling a story about the start of the modern electronic components would be to anyone that wasn't into the actual soldering/repairing of the devices. You gotta be kidding. Kutcher can't act worth a damn. They should've gone with Tom Cruise, since he looks more like Jobs.
He at least can act decently.. |
|
AlcoholPremium
join:2003-05-26
Climax, MI
kudos:3 Reviews:
·Comcast
| Cruise charges more money per movie than the budget ($8.5M) for this movie x5.
Also, he wouldn't lose the weight required to look the part. You needed a shitty actor willing to go on a diet to look the part.
They could have chosen a less shitty actor though. Kutcher is horrible.
I won't be watching this movie unless it comes on netflix. Will definitely watch the Aaron Sorkin one though.
--
I found the key to success but somebody changed the lock. |
|
