<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Topic &#x27;Re: Washington 2?&#x27; in forum &#x27;&#x27; - dslreports.com</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Washington-2-27947747</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2013 09:34:02 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2013 09:34:02 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: Washington 2?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Washington-2-27948417</link>
<description><![CDATA[claydowns posted : Washington 2 is Cellular Market Area (CMA) 694. It's fairly large in land area. Looking on Google Maps it appears some of the populated places are Okanogan and Wenatchee if that helps any.<br><br>Assuming your profile location of Richland, WA is accurate, that's CMA 214. AT&T already owns both the lower B block and lower C block 700 MHz licenses there so I don't think your area is affected by this particular transaction.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Washington-2-27948417</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2013 23:10:36 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Washington 2?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Washington-2-27947747</link>
<description><![CDATA[Acarney posted : Anyone know what geographic area "Washington 2" covers? Would love to know if my area gained some new AT&T spectrum....]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Washington-2-27947747</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2013 18:52:50 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
