Topic 'Pentagon to boost cybersecurity force' in forum 'Security' - dslreports.com http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Pentagon-to-boost-cybersecurity-force-27953817 en Sun, 19 May 2013 17:22:26 EDT Sun, 19 May 2013 17:22:26 EDT Re: Pentagon to boost cybersecurity force http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Pentagon-to-boost-cybersecurity-force-27959223 said by GILXA1226:

They already do that to some degree with the SIPRNet, and I have to think, if it was a cost effective replacement they would have moved all of their systems over. I'm sure somewhere there is an AoA document that explains why they haven't moved everything off.

I'm just talking about NIPRNet.

I don't even want to address the other networks.]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Pentagon-to-boost-cybersecurity-force-27959223 Tue, 29 Jan 2013 17:30:03 EDT Re: Pentagon to boost cybersecurity force http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Pentagon-to-boost-cybersecurity-force-27956226 said by Secyurityet:

If they would just byte the bullet, and move off the web onto a proprietary network, they wouldn't NEED uscybercom.

You can't infiltrate a network you can't get to.

But nobody wants to spend the money...

They already do that to some degree with the SIPRNet, and I have to think, if it was a cost effective replacement they would have moved all of their systems over. I'm sure somewhere there is an AoA document that explains why they haven't moved everything off.
--
We don't give a d@mn for the whole state of Michigan... we're from OHIO! O!H! ... I!O!]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Pentagon-to-boost-cybersecurity-force-27956226 Mon, 28 Jan 2013 19:08:25 EDT Re: Pentagon to boost cybersecurity force http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Pentagon-to-boost-cybersecurity-force-27955867 http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Pentagon-to-boost-cybersecurity-force-27955867 Mon, 28 Jan 2013 17:11:24 EDT Re: Pentagon to boost cybersecurity force http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Pentagon-to-boost-cybersecurity-force-27955859
You can't infiltrate a network you can't get to.

But nobody wants to spend the money...]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Pentagon-to-boost-cybersecurity-force-27955859 Mon, 28 Jan 2013 17:08:01 EDT Re: Pentagon to boost cybersecurity force http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Pentagon-to-boost-cybersecurity-force-27954740 said by GILXA1226:

I think they've had a clue about it for a while now, at least the last 4-5 years. The problem is the implementation and typical government BS. First each service was going to have their own setup, then the Cyber Command was setup, but under the USAF, which of course pissed off the Army, Navy and to a lesser extend USMC, so it was moved to a Joint Command and last I heard they were having difficulties getting it staffed due to location of the command. It's been a while since I've heard anything new.

Just another typical Charlie Foxtrot for those of us all too familiar with what comes with any military operation marked out as being under the auspices of a (so-called) "Joint Command". :uhh:
--
The maximum effective range of an excuse is ZERO meters!]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Pentagon-to-boost-cybersecurity-force-27954740 Mon, 28 Jan 2013 12:05:43 EDT Re: Pentagon to boost cybersecurity force http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Pentagon-to-boost-cybersecurity-force-27953834 --
We don't give a d@mn for the whole state of Michigan... we're from OHIO! O!H! ... I!O!]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Pentagon-to-boost-cybersecurity-force-27953834 Mon, 28 Jan 2013 05:41:29 EDT Pentagon to boost cybersecurity force http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Pentagon-to-boost-cybersecurity-force-27953817
“Given the malicious actors that are out there and the development of the technology, in my mind, there’s little doubt that some adversary is going to attempt a significant cyberattack on the United States at some point,” said William J. Lynn III"

»www.washingtonpost.com/world/nat···?hpid=z1]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Pentagon-to-boost-cybersecurity-force-27953817 Mon, 28 Jan 2013 04:58:38 EDT