 roccaStart.caPremium
join:2008-11-16
London, ON
kudos:11 | reply to LostTheGame
Re: CNOC Files w/ CRTC Against Rogers That's for speed matching on disaggregated, still very important but not the 'big one' on capacity rates that we're waiting for. |
|
resa1983Premium
join:2008-03-10
North York, ON
kudos:7 Reviews:
 ·TekSavvy Cable
| said by rocca:That's for speed matching on disaggregated, still very important but not the 'big one' on capacity rates that we're waiting for.
Thats the decision this thread is about. 
--
Battle.net Tech Support MVP |
|
roccaStart.caPremium
join:2008-11-16
London, ON
kudos:11 | Doh. Caffeine deficiency. |
|
|
|
resa1983Premium
join:2008-03-10
North York, ON
kudos:7 Reviews:
·TekSavvy Cable
| said by rocca:Doh. Caffeine deficiency.
Too many similar threads imo. 
Doesn't help that this UBB/AVP/CBB decision has dragged on for years now, and encompasses multiple threads based on Decisions, interim, R&V, etc.
--
Battle.net Tech Support MVP |
|
| said by resa1983:said by rocca:Doh. Caffeine deficiency.
Doesn't help that this UBB/AVP/CBB decision has dragged on for years now, and encompasses multiple threads based on Decisions, interim, R&V, etc. Just reading that paragraph w/o a coffee I.V. causes dizziness. If you take a couple of weeks break from these diff filings one gets confused as to what is what.
It seems I started this topic under the name of "aaah", and I don't even recall what it's about anymore. Maybe I knew it would cause me to drool at some point in time while I say "aaah".
Back to the coffee... |
|
