| reply to Rebrider
Re: Pentagon to boost cybersecurity force If they would just byte the bullet, and move off the web onto a proprietary network, they wouldn't NEED uscybercom.
You can't infiltrate a network you can't get to.
But nobody wants to spend the money... |
|
|
|
 RebriderBeen There Done ThatPremium
join:2000-11-23 | + 1 |
|
 GILXA1226Premium,MVM
join:2000-12-29
Dayton, OH | reply to Secyurityet
said by Secyurityet:If they would just byte the bullet, and move off the web onto a proprietary network, they wouldn't NEED uscybercom.
You can't infiltrate a network you can't get to.
But nobody wants to spend the money...
They already do that to some degree with the SIPRNet, and I have to think, if it was a cost effective replacement they would have moved all of their systems over. I'm sure somewhere there is an AoA document that explains why they haven't moved everything off.
--
We don't give a d@mn for the whole state of Michigan... we're from OHIO! O!H! ... I!O! |
|
| said by GILXA1226:They already do that to some degree with the SIPRNet, and I have to think, if it was a cost effective replacement they would have moved all of their systems over. I'm sure somewhere there is an AoA document that explains why they haven't moved everything off.
I'm just talking about NIPRNet.
I don't even want to address the other networks. |
|
