Tell me more x
, there is a new speed test available. Give it a try, leave feedback!
dslreports logo
 
    All Forums Hot Topics Gallery
spc

spacer

Search Topic:
uniqs
49
share rss forum feed

Secyurityet
Premium
join:2012-01-07
untied state

1 recommendation

reply to Rebrider

Re: Pentagon to boost cybersecurity force

If they would just byte the bullet, and move off the web onto a proprietary network, they wouldn't NEED uscybercom.

You can't infiltrate a network you can't get to.

But nobody wants to spend the money...


Rebrider
Been There Done That
Premium
join:2000-11-23
+ 1


GILXA1226
Premium,MVM
join:2000-12-29
Dayton, OH
reply to Secyurityet
said by Secyurityet:

If they would just byte the bullet, and move off the web onto a proprietary network, they wouldn't NEED uscybercom.

You can't infiltrate a network you can't get to.

But nobody wants to spend the money...

They already do that to some degree with the SIPRNet, and I have to think, if it was a cost effective replacement they would have moved all of their systems over. I'm sure somewhere there is an AoA document that explains why they haven't moved everything off.
--
We don't give a d@mn for the whole state of Michigan... we're from OHIO! O!H! ... I!O!

Secyurityet
Premium
join:2012-01-07
untied state
said by GILXA1226:

They already do that to some degree with the SIPRNet, and I have to think, if it was a cost effective replacement they would have moved all of their systems over. I'm sure somewhere there is an AoA document that explains why they haven't moved everything off.

I'm just talking about NIPRNet.

I don't even want to address the other networks.