dslreports logo
 
    All Forums Hot Topics Gallery
spc
uniqs
59
Secyurityet
Premium Member
join:2012-01-07
untied state

1 recommendation

Secyurityet to Rebrider

Premium Member

to Rebrider

Re: Pentagon to boost cybersecurity force

If they would just byte the bullet, and move off the web onto a proprietary network, they wouldn't NEED uscybercom.

You can't infiltrate a network you can't get to.

But nobody wants to spend the money...

Rebrider
Been There Done That
Premium Member
join:2000-11-23

Rebrider

Premium Member

+ 1

GILXA1226
MVM
join:2000-12-29
Dayton, OH

GILXA1226 to Secyurityet

MVM

to Secyurityet
said by Secyurityet:

If they would just byte the bullet, and move off the web onto a proprietary network, they wouldn't NEED uscybercom.

You can't infiltrate a network you can't get to.

But nobody wants to spend the money...

They already do that to some degree with the SIPRNet, and I have to think, if it was a cost effective replacement they would have moved all of their systems over. I'm sure somewhere there is an AoA document that explains why they haven't moved everything off.
Secyurityet
Premium Member
join:2012-01-07
untied state
·T-Mobile

Secyurityet

Premium Member

said by GILXA1226:

They already do that to some degree with the SIPRNet, and I have to think, if it was a cost effective replacement they would have moved all of their systems over. I'm sure somewhere there is an AoA document that explains why they haven't moved everything off.

I'm just talking about NIPRNet.

I don't even want to address the other networks.