|
SB783 to Anon12
Anon
2013-Jan-29 3:52 pm
to Anon12
Re: [BC] TELUS High Speed Turbo 25 Usage being reduced 50%Forgive me Anon12, but if I have to choose between you and pfak, I'll go with pfak, who has stated that Telus will begin gouging in the fall. Personally I have no doubt that Telus will enforce their ridiculous caps and the first additional charge I receive will be that last as I will be gone to Teksavvy. They can take the entire Optik package and ...... |
|
|
IamTed
Anon
2013-Jan-29 9:17 pm
Exactly. I will drop telus as soon as I get my first overage bill. I was paying for 25meg service/500 gigs allowance per month.. Now we get to pay more for less. Guess what Telus.... You lose |
|
|
Anon12 to SB783
Anon
2013-Jan-29 11:57 pm
to SB783
So will I but pfak as far as i know does not work for telus, and was just speculating. I also dont recall him saying its coming in fall in this thread?
As for why they would lower the caps, is this still happening, last i seen in this thread the note to lower the caps was missing. |
|
Ikarasu join:2004-01-09 Port Coquitlam, BC |
If pfak says it'll happen... I'm sure one of his Telus friends who's in the know has told him. So don't expect him to cite a source....
Theres no reason they would lower caps, and then not enforce them. I do however doubt they'll charge the expensive rates they have listed now - I presume they'll follow in bells steps, like they do for Cells - Offer an unlimited plan for premium, and sell block accounts for those who don't "Need" premium.
On a different note.
Shaws 25M comes with 250 Gb... No wonder Telus is lowering it.
I don't know about you guys, but I'm not waiting to see if they'll enforce it, when they likely will. I'm going to try to get out of my yearly contract. |
|
|
to Anon12
Anon12, while pfak didn't post that info in this thread, he did here: » [BC] 80% of my current usage for an extra $13/month?Pfak has been a reliable source of accurate info for years, I have no reason to begin doubting him now. I guess , in the fall, we'll see if he's correct. |
|
Kruisey join:2006-12-30 Vancouver, BC 2 edits |
Kruisey
Member
2013-Jan-30 11:22 am
Have been seriously thinking about this theme. The TV is a the money maker and the moment Internet is due to the fact its being used as a TV for viewing. Would folks that use just internet be willing to pay more just for that to get unlimited use say $95 per month?
I don't know how that' not due' got into my thread gremlins at work now corrected |
|
Kruisey |
When I sign in my correction in above shows' due to'. When I sign out a 'not due' is there in the post. "it should read 'Due to the Fact that TV ' Have edited it twice. |
|
fatguy join:2006-07-21 Edmonton, AB |
to Kruisey
.....the business side has unlimited 25/5 for ~85 a month, just for the sake of comparison & that includes your choice of primary hardware (combo dsl modem/router or pure dsl modem) and a preconfigured 4G modem as backup. I would pay that. |
|
Kruisey join:2006-12-30 Vancouver, BC |
Kruisey
Member
2013-Jan-30 10:16 pm
Then if that was available to the home subscriber also it would solve this problem. |
|