<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Topic &#x27;Re: real reason for LA and SATX rate hikes??&#x27; in forum &#x27;&#x27; - dslreports.com</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-real-reason-for-LA-and-SATX-rate-hikes-27964946</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 22:38:44 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 22:38:44 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: real reason for LA and SATX rate hikes??</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-real-reason-for-LA-and-SATX-rate-hikes-27966201</link>
<description><![CDATA[alexintexas posted : i was speaking of "youtube" sorry for the confusion <br><br>which i might add is owned by google :)]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-real-reason-for-LA-and-SATX-rate-hikes-27966201</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2013 15:43:01 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: real reason for LA and SATX rate hikes??</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-real-reason-for-LA-and-SATX-rate-hikes-27966116</link>
<description><![CDATA[PaulHikeS2 posted : <div class="bquote"><said>said by <a href="/profile/751375" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=751375');">alexintexas</a>:</said><p>google is a PERFECT example of it and funny thing google does not pay for any content but it does profit on all its ad revenue<br> </p></div>Google profits on it's ad revenue because they do not pay for content. They catalog and search for it.<br><br>Other's pay for the content. <br><small>--<br>Jay: What the @#$% is the internet???</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-real-reason-for-LA-and-SATX-rate-hikes-27966116</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2013 15:24:02 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: real reason for LA and SATX rate hikes??</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-real-reason-for-LA-and-SATX-rate-hikes-27965547</link>
<description><![CDATA[alexintexas posted : Does not matter what it costs,,,,the ad revenue generated of this sole channel would pay for its content, and id go as far to say they would even get profits off the ad revenue..This is what "everyone" fails to understand that ad revenue pays for the content, and even profits,,,folks like us pay to pay to watch tv.  :huh:<br><br>google is a PERFECT example of it and funny thing google does not pay for any content but it does profit on all its ad revenue]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-real-reason-for-LA-and-SATX-rate-hikes-27965547</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2013 13:18:38 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: real reason for LA and SATX rate hikes??</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-real-reason-for-LA-and-SATX-rate-hikes-27965450</link>
<description><![CDATA[ISurfTooMuch posted : At least in LA, TWC just got rights to the Dodgers games.  And, as you know, sports rights are expensive, so guess who gets to pay for that.  Plus, they probably figure that people will pay a premium to see those games, which drives prices even higher.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-real-reason-for-LA-and-SATX-rate-hikes-27965450</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2013 12:58:40 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>real reason for LA and SATX rate hikes??</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/real-reason-for-LA-and-SATX-rate-hikes-27964946</link>
<description><![CDATA[alexintexas posted : So if this is the real reason for the rate hike. LA and SATX are paying for the lost revenue and continue to lose, this would be utter BS! TWC still makes a profit even at those rates]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/real-reason-for-LA-and-SATX-rate-hikes-27964946</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2013 10:58:56 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
