<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Topic &#x27;Not $40/month&#x27; in forum &#x27;&#x27; - dslreports.com</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Not-40month-27966470</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 19:00:48 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 19:00:48 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Not $40/month</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Not-40month-27966470</link>
<description><![CDATA[elray posted : More like $55, when you include the phone tax and the SSR charge.<br><br>If you're a heavy, traditional landline user, and you're reasonably close to the central office, its quite competitive versus a double-play option from Time Warner.<br><br>But if you're farther down the line or don't want dialtone, it doesn't seem like such a deal.<br><br>The good news is that Sonic is handling the traffic, so other than the usual AT&T-copper folly, there shouldn't be any issues with achieving the maximum potential speed.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Not-40month-27966470</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2013 16:54:03 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
