<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Topic &#x27;Re: Where exactly does at&#x26;t look good?&#x27; in forum &#x27;&#x27; - dslreports.com</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Where-exactly-does-att-look-good-27968451</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 19:15:10 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 19:15:10 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: Where exactly does at&#x26;t look good?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Where-exactly-does-att-look-good-27969367</link>
<description><![CDATA[djrobx posted : <div class="bquote"><said>said by <a href="/profile/1764001" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1764001');">mdpeterman</a>:</said><p>Time for Time Warner Cable to up their speeds! I'm paying $100/month for 50 down 5 up. Why not for the same price get 150/50!<br> </p></div>That's what I was thinking.   Then again, at least we don't have to deal with caps yet.  <br><small>--<br><b>AT&T U-Hearse</b> - RIP Unlimited Internet 1995-2011<br>Rethink Billable.<br></small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Where-exactly-does-att-look-good-27969367</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2013 13:34:04 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Where exactly does at&#x26;t look good?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Where-exactly-does-att-look-good-27968553</link>
<description><![CDATA[skeechan posted : That is Cox doing 150/50 not AT&T.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Where-exactly-does-att-look-good-27968553</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2013 10:09:44 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Where exactly does at&#x26;t look good?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Where-exactly-does-att-look-good-27968542</link>
<description><![CDATA[mdpeterman posted : Time for Time Warner Cable to up their speeds! I'm paying $100/month for 50 down 5 up. Why not for the same price get 150/50!]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Where-exactly-does-att-look-good-27968542</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2013 10:05:12 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Where exactly does at&#x26;t look good?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Where-exactly-does-att-look-good-27968451</link>
<description><![CDATA[Metatron2008 posted : At least where they have cable or LTE as competitors?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Where-exactly-does-att-look-good-27968451</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2013 09:42:10 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
