<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Topic &#x27;Re: CBS&#x27; in forum &#x27;&#x27; - dslreports.com</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-CBS-27968678</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 11:07:02 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 11:07:02 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: CBS</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-CBS-27970412</link>
<description><![CDATA[PapaMidnight posted : <div class="bquote"><said>said by <a href="/profile/1663920" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1663920');">silbaco</a>:</said><p>This is hardly a concern for CBS. People will forget about it in a matter of a year or so. They always do.<br> </p></div>Jeff Gerstmann never forgets.<br>...<br>Until CBS bought out GiantBomb.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-CBS-27970412</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2013 18:20:35 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: CBS</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-CBS-27969777</link>
<description><![CDATA[ISurfTooMuch posted : It depends.  What may hurt CNET more is a damaged relationship with tech companies.  You can believe the news of CNET getting booted from CES has made the rounds in these companies.  Now, would these companies be as eager to work with CNET, knowing that, on a whim, CBS can erase anything that CNET has to say about them?  Under these circumstances, if you work at one of these companies, and you have missed calls from a CNET reporter and a reporter from a site with not so tarnished a reputation, whose call will you return first?<br><br>What you may end up with is a degradation of CNET's relationship with the manufacturers, which will lead to a degradation in the quality of what goes on their site.  Sooner or later, that will catch up with them.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-CBS-27969777</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2013 15:17:58 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: CBS</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-CBS-27968808</link>
<description><![CDATA[Kirby Smith posted : Perhaps some or most do; I remember their reporting on the Tet Offensive.<br><br>kirby]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-CBS-27968808</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2013 11:12:51 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>CBS</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/CBS-27968678</link>
<description><![CDATA[silbaco posted : This is hardly a concern for CBS. People will forget about it in a matter of a year or so. They always do.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/CBS-27968678</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2013 10:43:42 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
