republican-creole
site Search:


 
    All Forums Hot Topics Gallery






how-to block ads


 
Search Topic:
Uniqs:
223
Share Topic
Posting?
Post a:
Post a:
Links: ·MS Apps FAQ ·Windows XP FAQ ·Windows 7 FAQ ·Windows Home ·Office Home
AuthorAll Replies

Gem
Premium
join:2005-09-10
kudos:2

[WIN8] Is it desirable to "optimze" flash drives in W8?

So what's the word, optimize flash (USB) drives in W8 or not?

Why or why not?


Cudni
La Merma - Vigilado
Premium,MVM
join:2003-12-20
Someshire
kudos:13

Re: [WIN8] Is it desirable to "optimze" flash drives i

I don't think it will make any difference either way (win 8 and >)

Cudni

Gem
Premium
join:2005-09-10
kudos:2

what about plain old defragmenting of USB flash drives?

Is that desirable or not recommended or of no consequence?


dave
Premium,MVM
join:2000-05-04
not in ohio
kudos:8

Don't.

The reason why 'fragmentation' is a bad thing on most rotating storage is that, when reading a file, the heads have to move from one fragment to another, and that's a relatively slow mechanical operation (takes milliseconds rather than microseconds).

So, there's no gain from defragging a device which does not have moving read/write heads.

What defragmentation will give you on flash-based storage is 'more writes done' as fragments are moved around the storage: which is, after all, what defragging actually is. Since the lifetime of flash is measured in the number of writes to any given cell, it's not a good idea to waste writes doing something that doesn't help.

So, not only is defragmenting not useful, it costs you very slightly in probable lifetime.

(But don't get totally paranoid about minimizing writes; sometimes the above write-limit gets misinterpreted in some sort of extreme way).


Saturday, 25-May 11:13:59 Terms of Use & Privacy | feedback | contact | Hosting by nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo
over 13.5 years online © 1999-2013 dslreports.com.
Most commented news this week
Hot Topics